LadyCatharine
Courtier
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2011
- Messages
- 510
- City
- Northeast Ohio
- Country
- United States
So much for seeing the royal family jewels!!
I sometimes think the media and certain commentators underestimate just how 'tough' the Duke of Cambridge is. IMO HRH does not take abuse from anyone and the tabloid press cross him at their peril.
I'm sure the last thing Closer thought was they would wind up in court having TRH lawyer staring them down lol.
The media doesn't need the royals not like the monarchy of Britain going to last long. Scotland has 2 more years to decide to they want to stay within the monarchy or become an independent country. This is the 21 century we don't need the monarchy.
The media doesn't need the royals not like the monarchy of Britain going to last long. Scotland has 2 more years to decide to they want to stay within the monarchy or become an independent country. This is the 21 century we don't need the monarchy.
I think it's dumb how there suing the magazine company who posted the pictures. So anyone takes a picture of Catherine or William doing something inappropriate will be sued (ohh i'm so scared.) Dumb waste of money and time.
You know everyone in France does it all the time. Run around butt naked whatever people are just to damn sensitive. I mean look Princess Diana did it, Sofia, etc. So what makes her so special.Good grief!!! What exactly does it show? That they are a married couple? That in private on private property they might sunbathe topless or even nude? Big whoop!!! Hardly shocking or wrong or unangelic. Many people do exactly the same thing in private and if you happen to visit the beaches of the Mediterranean or the lakes around Berlin you will see exactly the same thing in public. Heck since you are I believe in Toronto I suggest you hop onto a ferry to the Toronto islands on a hot sunny day and take yourself to Hanlans Point and you will find hundreds of ordinary Torontonians letting it all hang out on the beach there. Not shocking. Not scandalous. Not wrong. Not impure.
FYI you even live in a place where it is perfectly legal for a woman to walk topless through the streets of the city, and yes it has been done.
You know everyone in France does it all the time. Run around butt naked whatever people are just to damn sensitive. I mean look Princess Diana did it, Sofia, etc. So what makes her so special.
Culture and traditions are not a matter of "need". The monarchy is the form of governmant that some countries have chosen to keep. The reigning King/Queen is the head of state. It really is up to each monarchy to decide if they want to keep the parlamentary form or not. All of the european monarchies are democracies so the people have the choice to say what they want.The media doesn't need the royals not like the monarchy of Britain going to last long. Scotland has 2 more years to decide to they want to stay within the monarchy or become an independent country. This is the 21 century we don't need the monarchy.
Richard Littlejohn of the DM went as far as to say that the Duchess is 'public property' and should expect photos any time and anywhere.
Sorry I don't follow the Dutch Royals so I don't know what are you talking about
Got more to do with the fact she isn't Middleton than the none use of their titles.
I think the editor should be fired as well as the French one.soapstar said:The editor of the Irish Star has been suspended.
BBC News - Kate topless pictures: Irish Daily Star editor is suspended
In the meantime, there seems to be a deal in place, the Dutch do regualar photoshoots / allow pictures on several, even private occasions but are left alone when they feel it is important, what seems to work.
When there is a Cambridge baby, William & Kate will need to make a such a deal as well because I dont think even the british press will back off then and we are not only talking about the child of William & Kate but a future heir/ess of the country.
By that reasoning, we should expect front-row seats when the Duchess delivers her first child.
The Daily Mail targets a specific demographic and they are successful in winding up their readership. I visit their website for the photos only, their reportage is cringe worthy.
I am assuming that Chi and Closer are separate entities although they share common ownership. Is this correct and does a judgement against Closer also impact Chi?