This is definitely worth reading - its about attacking upskirt pictures, not the person in question. A different perspective from a UK paper which is not misogynistic in tone or casual sexism. And its a women writing this.
Kate Middleton in Bild: We should be outraged by all upskirt pictures - Comment - Voices - The Independent
This is definitely worth reading - its about attacking upskirt pictures, not the person in question. A different perspective from a UK paper which is not misogynistic in tone or casual sexism. And its a women writing this.
Kate Middleton in Bild: We should be outraged by all upskirt pictures - Comment - Voices - The Independent
This is definitely worth reading - its about attacking upskirt pictures, not the person in question. A different perspective from a UK paper which is not misogynistic in tone or casual sexism. And its a women writing this.
Kate Middleton in Bild: We should be outraged by all upskirt pictures - Comment - Voices - The Independent
This is definitely worth reading - its about attacking upskirt pictures, not the person in question. A different perspective from a UK paper which is not misogynistic in tone or casual sexism. And its a women writing this.
Kate Middleton in Bild: We should be outraged by all upskirt pictures - Comment - Voices - The Independent
If it was only true. The only time when British Magazines don't act reckless is when the BRF are involved (especially the Cambridges), other than that they are the first ones to print all kind of wardrobe malfunctions of anyone and much worse. Now they are pointing the finger at BILD if they were the source of evil, what a joke.
EDIT@Al_bina, just noticed your post, agree 100 %
This is definitely worth reading - its about attacking upskirt pictures, not the person in question. A different perspective from a UK paper which is not misogynistic in tone or casual sexism. And its a women writing this.
Kate Middleton in Bild: We should be outraged by all upskirt pictures - Comment - Voices - The Independent
Thank you for sharing this cepe. Why should any person be subjected to this type of intrusive photography? If we see a person with toilet paper stuck to their show, zipper or button undone, shouldn't our first reaction be to discreetly call attention to the problem so the wearer is not embarrassed? Why do people go out of their way to photograph women under their dresses or skirts? Snapping pictures of mothers nursing their babies happens as well. It's a gross invasion of privacy.
This is NOT a royal story - it's about how women are generally treated.
Absolutely spot on, as indeed is the article ...
So disappointing to see so much self righteous 'tut tutting' here in this forum too. Mostly [i note] from other women who often seem to fall over themselves to denigrate and 'do down' other members of their sex !
I certainly agree 100%. My take on this entire subject is that most of the pictures taken of Kate in embarrassing situations is done by women.Thank you for sharing this cepe. Why should any person be subjected to this type of intrusive photography? If we see a person with toilet paper stuck to their show, zipper or button undone, shouldn't our first reaction be to discreetly call attention to the problem so the wearer is not embarrassed? Why do people go out of their way to photograph women under their dresses or skirts? Snapping pictures of mothers nursing their babies happens as well. It's a gross invasion of privacy.
You're missing the entire point and calling her an attention seeker is a straight up rude statement to make. It's never okay to photograph people in such sensitive situations but it keeps on happening to women.Oh, come on...it is a Royal story. It's about how the heir to the heir's wife is unconcerned about her wardrobe malfunctions or she is a blatant attention seeker. If you don't want your personals talked about, don't set yourself up in a full skirted dress with no slip and, perhaps, no underwear when you know you are going to be around a helicopter with rotating blades. Sorry, she must be thick as a brick to continue letting this happen.
I did not miss the entire point. No photographer could know the opportunity would be there. The offending photo is probably part of a film burn of 100 auto snaps. The reason it took two weeks to find it was because it was buried in thousands of snaps.
She is, IMO, an attention seeker or this would not have been the EIGHTH Marilyn Moment for Kate. EIGHT times, not one, not two...
I'm not talking about women in general, I'm commenting about Kate.
Well, there will be a bazaar style lamentation of rabid fans citing jealousy, low-class, stupidity etc of those, who do not share their rosy opinions.^^^Yes, let's be honest. Any opportunity to criticize someone who doesn't agree with you makes your day... [snipped.
First of all she didn't need to be shy walking down the catwalk, she had on a pretty nightie with underwear underneath, I have seen so much more bare butts, bare breasts walking down Victoria Secrets catwalk, these people let it all hang out, she wasn't indecent during that. I thought the way she wore that outfit was pretty and cute and sexy, no big deal.
Second: she was on private property, and we don't know if the security guards where around there or not........nothing was mentioned of security guards....I would think that security guards won't be hanging around the royal couple every second of the day or night, they could be walking the grounds for all we know. AND MOST OF ALL, IT WAS PRIVATE PROPERTY and there is *no reason on this earth that she can't do that in her home/someone else's private property, that is an invasion of their private time and home/vacation. I don't need to know what they do in the bedroom, yet it seems the media and some of the people of the world want to be there right beside them in the bedroom for they have nothing else better to do with their time.
Don't people realize that the media is force feeding us stuff that is none of our business and we are idiots for falling for it! The media says we need this junk and pictures and all the crappy stuff that they send us.....DO WE?
Oh, come on...it is a Royal story. It's about how the heir to the heir's wife is unconcerned about her wardrobe malfunctions or she is a blatant attention seeker. If you don't want your personals talked about, don't set yourself up in a full skirted dress with no slip and, perhaps, no underwear when you know you are going to be around a helicopter with rotating blades. Sorry, she must be thick as a brick to continue letting this happen.
The Australian newspaper "The Daily Telegraph" is making sure the general public - who don't follow the Royals all around the internet in their spare time - knows about the Blue Mts photo.
It is in the newspaper again today, Thursday 29th- not pixelated - as well as in yesterday's paper.
A different journalist today - and the article taking up three quarters of the page with only one other article, and the opposite page just an ad.
Most people wouldn't have known about this - though it was covered quite extensively on TV the other day - but they can't not know now, after seeing the photo two days in a row here in Oz.
This is our most popular daily newspaper in NSW.
National newspaper "The Australian" reported it on Tuesday 27th - journalist Michael Morrow - and the two TV shows I saw cover it, (there may have been other channels I didn't watch), are also broadcast nation-wide.
I think if it had "just" been picked up by one of the weekly women's magazines here, a lot of people wouldn't know about it.
But, being in the newspapers and on TV, a lot of the general public are being informed - and indeed getting to see.