The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-10-2005, 02:21 PM
Imperial Majesty
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
I have a question to those more informed than me: Prince Charles has other titles than the title of Duke of Cornwall. So will Camilla also gain the titles Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Chester and Countess of Carrick?
There's no reason why she shouldn't. The thing is that as far as I know, she also gains the title Princess of Wales; it's just that she won't be known by that title. I mean, if Charles is Prince of Wales and she marries him and if the law about inheritance of titles hasn't been changed, I don't see how it could be avoided that in theory she's also the Princess of Wales. So far nobody seems to be saying that she won't have the right to that title, it just says she won't be known by it.

Old 02-10-2005, 02:25 PM
RoseMary's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: , United States
Posts: 150

She will not have the title of Princess of Wales or any other of Charles titles. Just Duchess of Cornwall and when Charles is king she will be known as Princess Consort and not Queen. That is what I heard in the news this morining,all the people they interviewed were extremely clear that she would not have the title of Princess of Wales. Which i think is a good idea. She doesn't have any legal right to it either because it will be civil service, there is going to be a prayer service after the wedding at Windsor Castle. Although I think Charles could get arranged so she has those titles but until then she has no legal right to them.

If you want something done right, do it yourself.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:25 PM
cute_girl's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 993
looking at Camilla's pix,I can see that we're gonna have so much to talk in the ugly brides thread in 2 months
Old 02-10-2005, 02:27 PM
Julia's Avatar
Royal Highness
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,516
Originally Posted by cute_girl
looking at Camilla's pix,I can see that we're gonna have so much to talk in the ugly brides thread in 2 months
Please try and keep the discussion polite and appropriate.

Thank you.
It's clever, but is it art? ~Rudyard Kipling
Old 02-10-2005, 02:29 PM
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East of the sun and west of the moon, United States
Posts: 6,409
The Prince of Wales on his way from Clarence House to Windsor Castle on February 10.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	52173880.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	18.1 KB
ID:	92304  
Old 02-10-2005, 02:32 PM
Imperial Majesty
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
It's amazing how quickly times change, isn't it? 30 years ago, when Charles and Camilla first wanted to get married, the Queen wouldn't allow it because Camilla was a commoner. Now things have come full circle and they are finally getting married. Think of how much sadness and heartbreak on both sides could have been avoided if they had been allowed to marry the first time around.
I'm pretty sure there was more to it than that. Charles and Camilla were both rather young when they met for the first time, and Charles was in the Navy and away at sea for long stretches. Plus, he was still very much under Lord Mountbatten's influence, and Mountbatten seemed to be angling for Charles to marry one of the Mountbatten granddaughters so he would have been counselling against Charles marrying Camilla, which would probably have carried a lot of weight with Charles. And then there was the problem of Camilla's past affairs (and her relationship with Andrew Parker Bowles, which was overlapping with her relationship with Charles) and the fact that her family wasn't noble and also had some scandals in it, and the whole lot together would have been too much.

Charles doesn't sound like the world's most decisive or forceful character, and he'd have had to be both of the above in order to marry Camilla back in the early 1970s. The Duke of Windsor was still (just about) alive then, and the Duchess was very much so; I'm sure the Queen Mother would have hated having her beloved grandson's name dragged through the press in the same breath as the Duke's.

So Charles ended up marrying someone who was eminently suitable on paper and disastrous as a partner for him in real life. If someone was to send a story like this to a publisher as a piece of fiction, it'd be rejected for being too far-fetched.

The whole thing really has been a mess. I hope they can finally salvage something out of it; it's just a horrible shame that it involved such an awful tragedy for Diana before it was all over.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:34 PM
Serene Highness
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 1,483
Originally Posted by cute_girl
I've not heard of this news,i mean about harry thinks of Camilla,would you please tell me whats it about?
Here is a link from the PHarry thread. If you scroll down you will see that me and kinneret posted the same article. I bolded and underlined some things in the article so it may be easier to see the hot details
*Under Construction*
Old 02-10-2005, 02:35 PM
GrandDuchess's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somwhere, Sweden
Posts: 3,403
This photograph which has been released by Clarence House today shows the Prince of Wales and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles at Birkhall in Scotland last month as the two were leaving for a Sunday church service
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2471541.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	54.8 KB
ID:	92314  
Sofia's Blog (my blog)
Old 02-10-2005, 02:36 PM
Imperial Majesty
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Congratulations to the Couple. I wish them the best. Itīs unfortunate that she will not be called the Princess of Wales for she is marrying the Prince of Wales. And too bad she will not be called Queen Camilla. I like the ring of that.
It may yet happen. The wording on the Prince of Wales website says "it is intended" that she be called Princess Consort; it doesn't sound as though it's set in rock. In another five or ten years, when people have got used to the idea of Charles and Camilla as a couple and more and more young people see Diana just as part of history, who knows what might happen.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:38 PM
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East of the sun and west of the moon, United States
Posts: 6,409
"So Charles ended up marrying someone who was eminently suitable on paper and disastrous as a partner for him in real life. If someone was to send a story like this to a publisher as a piece of fiction, it'd be rejected for being too far-fetched."

Well said, Elspeth and itīs a shame that as wife to the future king that she will not be Queen nor will she be called the Princess of Wales for she will be married to the Prince of Wales. Also itīs interested to note that the last prince(ss) consort was Albert, the husband of Queen Victoria, who also had quite considerable opposition as well and he turned out to be quite the right husband and advisor to Victoria.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:41 PM
Imperial Majesty
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Now I'm confused. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it at least frowned upon by the Church of England to have two divorcees marry, especially since one was a factor in the collapse of a marriage AND if one or both of their former spouses are still alive? I thought as king, Charles was going to be the defender of the faith, not the hypocritical representative of it.
Yes, that's correct. However, they aren't having a church wedding, just a civil ceremony followed by a service of prayer and dedication in the church, which has been standard procedure for the remarriage of divorcees with a living ex-spouse for a long time.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:52 PM
marezdote's Avatar
Royal Highness
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, United States
Posts: 1,528
Engagement pic

I wish they had chosen a different pic to release as their engagement pic. I am not a fan of the one they released.
Old 02-10-2005, 02:58 PM
monos26's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago, United States
Posts: 51
I know I'm in the minority, but I'm happy for them. They obviously love each other. As much as Diana was loved, it just really sounds like Charles and her should never have gotten married. Luckily, there is now more emphasis on the English royals being happy in their marriages, as there is the other royal houses.
Princess Charlotte
Old 02-10-2005, 02:59 PM
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 414
I'm shocked... shocked, shocked, shocked. But, even so, I wish them every happiness.
The English take the breeding of their horses and dogs more seriously than they do their children- HRH Princess Michael of Kent
Old 02-10-2005, 03:05 PM
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ----, Canada
Posts: 144
There are 200 people viewing the Royal Family of England forum!!!!! :)
i swear my heart stopped when i saw that
Old 02-10-2005, 03:07 PM
betina's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 586
I am also happy for them. Charles has obviously been in love with Camilla and I think it it wonderfull that true love can last so long. It was just a shame that Diana became a victim.
Charles should have married Camilla from the start, and then there havent been any problem at all.
Congratulation from me and I wish them both a long and happy marriage.

Old 02-10-2005, 03:23 PM
azile's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 471
I'm really surprised at the amount of anti-Camilla sentiment here. I know she's not as glamourous or as media savvy as Diana was. But that's the point- this is ANOTHER PERSON!

If Diana were still alive, my guess is that an engagement announcement from her would be met with a lot of well wishes. I'm surprised we don't offer the same respect to Charles. Yes, he had an affair during his marriage. So did Diana! I can't understand the blatant double standard that keeps coming up in public opinion.

Camilla may not be the woman we would choose, but that's the point. It's Charles' choice who he wants to spend the rest of his life with. Not ours.

They deserve a chance. Would it kill us to give it to them?

Old 02-10-2005, 03:29 PM
theprincess's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 235
What can I say...I was shocked when I heard the news. I never thought this day would least not when the Queen is still alive & regning. I wonder how Prince William and Prince Harry really feel about this? Obviously, in the public they will be quoted as being very happy and supportive. But this has to be very hard on both of them, I'm sure they are thinking of their mother on this day.
Old 02-10-2005, 03:31 PM
H.M. Margrethe's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 824
I donīt tink that she looks like she is going to be the next Princess Consort of UK. What say Prince Charles 2 children to this news??????
Long live the royal family in Denmark

Old 02-10-2005, 03:32 PM
theprincess's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 235

an article from

Prince Charles to marry Camilla Parker Bowles

Prince Charles announced Thursday he will marry his longtime partner Camilla Parker Bowles, but she won't become queen.

The Prince of Wales and Parker Bowles will tie the knot on April 8 at Windsor Castle, Clarence House, the Prince's residence and office confirmed.

"Camilla Parker Bowles was often disliked by the people in this country, sometimes blamed for what happened to the marriage of Charles and Diana," CTV's Tom Kennedy reported from London.

But he added that the tide seems to have turned.

"Generally now people are perceiving this wedding as the natural evolution of a couple who have been in love for a very long time," he said.

The announcement has also received the royal stamp of approval from Queen Elizabeth who said in a statement: "The Duke of Edinburgh and I are very happy that the Prince of Wales and Mrs. Parker Bowles are to marry."

Prince Charles' sons William and Harry are "delighted'' at the news, a spokesman for Prince Charles said.

Prime Minister Tony Blair also said he was "delighted for the Prince of Wales and Camilla Parker Bowles, it is very happy news." He added that the British cabinet sent their "congratulations and good wishes."

The marriage ceremony for the bride and groom, who are both divorced, will be a civil one, not a Church of England service.

"The wedding will be a largely private occasion for family and friends. There will be a civil ceremony in Windsor Castle," said Clarence House, Prince Charles' residence and office.

"There will subsequently be a service of prayer and dedication in St. George's Chapel at which the Archbishop of Canterbury will preside."

But Parker Bowles -- reportedly dubbed "the Rottweiler" by Diana and blamed by the late Princess for the breakup of her marriage -- will not be known as Queen Camilla if Prince Charles becomes king.

Rather, she will be known as Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Cornwall. If Prince Charles becomes King, she will be known as the Princess Consort.

"She will not be queen," John Aimers of the Monarchist League of Canada told Canada AM.

"Immediately, she will be a Royal Highness though, which is a very significant title, only given to the closest members of the Royal Family," he said.

He agreed that the decision to name her Duchess of Cornwall was a conscious one.

"They had to avoid the title of Princess of Wales so as not to upset the sensitivities of those who are in the Diana camp," he said.

The news comes amid recent controversy.

"What has been a little bit controversial recently is the rapidity at which (Prince Charles') estate has been growing," Kennedy reported.

"The other thing that has been a little bit controversial is the fact that the expenses of Camilla Parker Bowles is now part of that royal household expense," he said.

But he said there was barely any mention of the controversies surrounding Prince Charles in the excitement of the wedding buzz.

Kennedy reported that there's a little more bounce in Charles's step today, according to those who know the prince well.

Royal biographer Robert Lacey said he thinks "most people in their hearts like the idea of a middle-aged man who has worked so hard for the country being happy."

Charles, 56, divorced Princess Diana in 1996, a year before she was killed in a Paris car crash.

Parker Bowles, 57, obtained her divorce from army officer Andrew Parker Bowles in 1995.

Prince Charles and Parker Bowles have a long history that began when they met at a polo match in 1970.

According to royal folk legend, Parker Bowles reportedly told him: "My great-great-grandmother was your great-great-grandfather's mistress, so how about it?"

Parker Bowles was vilified by the public after tapes of intimate conversations between her and Prince Charles emerged in 1992 while he was still married.

In a 1994 television interview, Prince Charles admitted that he had been unfaithful during his marriage to Diana.

After Diana's death, Parker Bowles made tentative steps to win public approval by accompanying Prince Charles to galas and posing for official photographs with him. They now live together at his Clarence House residence in London.

Last year a Populus poll indicated that 32 per cent of Britons supported the marriage while 29 per cent were opposed. Thirty-eight per cent of Britons said they didn't care either way.

With files from The Associated Press and a report by CTV's Tom Kennedy

Closed Thread

camilla, camilla parker bowles, duchess of cornwall, engagement, prince charles, prince of wales

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charles and Camilla: The Marriage (2005 and on) VuMom The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 1597 11-25-2020 04:44 AM
Charles and Camilla: Visit to Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE - February 2007 hornsen Royal and Ruling Families of the Gulf States 183 03-02-2007 05:49 PM

Popular Tags
america archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian birth britain britannia british royal family camilla camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house colorblindness commonwealth countries coronation customs daisy duchess of sussex duke of cambridge duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family life family tree fashion and style gemstones george vi gradenigo gustaf vi adolf hello! henry viii highgrove hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs japan japanese imperial family jewellery kensington palace książ castle liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers medical meghan markle monarchist movements monarchists mongolia mountbatten nara period pless politics portugal prince harry queen elizabeth ii queen louise royal ancestry solomon j solomon spanish royal family suthida thai royal family tradition united states united states of america wales

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises