The article is making a false comparison between privately owned Sandringham & Crown Estate owned Frogmore Cottage. It's also making a false comparison between the Queen paying for her own repairs and the taxpayer paying for Harry & Meghan's.
The article's coverage of Harry & Meghan is twice as long as the coverage of Sandringham, despite them having nothing to do with Sandringham so the article is actually using the Sandringham repairs as another opportunity to reprint criticisms of money spent on Frogmore Cottage.
I was so very disappointed when drivein cinema's disappeared from our landscape. Such fun and eating popcorn and blaring the horn when something funny or un pc was shown. Smuggling your mate in via the boot. Remember that!! Nowadays most people use SVU's, not so easy for smuggling giggling bodies.
But in those good times political correctness wasn't even a term then.
Ahhh a glimpse of the good old days returning for a brief period.