 |
|

05-28-2008, 06:07 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,200
|
|
There were no press restrictions at the weddings of Lady Helen or the Earl of Ulster. The pics of these weddings that were printed in Hello were the same as those in many other publications. There was no "deal" on those occasions with any magazine.
|

05-29-2008, 12:29 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Frankly, without the informal shots of Kate, Chelsy and Harry, I can't imagine more than a handful of people would really be interested in the Phillips. Let's be honest, inspite all the gushing on the bride, she isn't a ravishing beauty and neither can be said of the groom. Neither are spetacularly rich in their on right. Nor any great professional acclaim to warrant a second look. And if the story on Peter and Autumn having editorial approval is to be believed, they knew it too. As much as I think the photos of the guests are lovely, they were "pimped out" for the benefit of the P&A. If the couple couldn't afford a grand wedding, they should have had one.
|

06-11-2008, 05:03 AM
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 89
|
|
I don't think that is fair to say. He is the Queen's grandson and with that I think many people would be interested in the wedding. I say would because its not going to get any press coverage. Instead we will hear about Britney Spears "the cyclone". I also don't think its right to say that they couldn't afford the wedding so they shouldn't have had a nice one. He is a royal, he may not have a title, but he is none the less. Because of this they should have as nice of a wedding as all of his cousins. For heavens sake he is also the oldest of her grandchildren
Oh yeah if they didn't sell the photos it would have been a wreck with all of the photographers trying to get the shot.
|

06-13-2008, 07:54 AM
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hamilton, Bermuda
Posts: 5
|
|
In the large group shot spread over the open of two pages why is Lady Louise not in it. The Lindley children and many others are in it. Zara's boyfriend, but not the Lady Louise.
I see her in one photos between her parents in the church
|

06-21-2008, 06:13 PM
|
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: london, United Kingdom
Posts: 277
|
|
Free Honeymoon for Peter and Autumn
|

06-21-2008, 06:17 PM
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: .a, United States
Posts: 3,341
|
|
Who cares.  People on this planet, including minor insignificant royals, have done far worse throughout history. They are not even on the Civil List anyway. So he's the grandson of the Queen... and the couple were paid for an exlcusive. Big deal. The press and certain people seem to be trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
|

06-21-2008, 06:48 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kirkland, United States
Posts: 682
|
|
The whole thing - wedding and honeymoon - was hadled in a tacky "nouveau riche" manner - I suspect that we shall see pictures from the delivery room on the birth of the first baby ... for a fee, of course!
|

06-22-2008, 11:33 AM
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: , Canada
Posts: 1,685
|
|
I find it intriguing by the push to portray a lot of the younger generation of royals as "down to earth". They don't do any official royal engagements (at least not the gruffy kind without a load of good press) and expect the paps to leave them alone at their leisure events. Yet, at every turn, they are happy to trade of their royal connection for relatively trivial gains. I mean there are tons of travel brochures with common folks standing about the site or near the resort logos. How many of these commoners would even be asked to consent releasing their photos from the visit? The hint-hint of Peter knowing someone at the resort is so desperate. Are the couple really so strapped from the cost of their wedding that they can't afford a honeymoon?
|

06-22-2008, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by helenstl
In the large group shot spread over the open of two pages why is Lady Louise not in it. The Lindley children and many others are in it. Zara's boyfriend, but not the Lady Louise.
I see her in one photos between her parents in the church
|
For some reason her parents did not want her photographed and therefore sent her straight home from the ceremony. I thought she was in one of the BBC videos but apparently not.
|

06-25-2008, 11:52 AM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: -, Ireland
Posts: 648
|
|
|

06-25-2008, 11:57 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelia
|
I don't understand this very company gives free holidays to many celebrities in exchange for photo rights - Zara Philips, Prince Micheal and Princess Micheal, Gary Player, Tiger Woods, Angelina Jolie - numerous South African local celebs. Not a single person blinked an eye when we saw the pics.
|

06-25-2008, 12:44 PM
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: -, Ireland
Posts: 648
|
|

I think a lot of the bad press boiled down to the fact that they wanted a private wedding, so no media allowed, but then sold the wedding the wedding photos - well that and I think it had a lot to do with the photos of Harry, Chelsy and Kate. Most papers would of killed for them. I know the Peter is the Queens eldest grandson but there is just not that much public interest in him like there is in his sister or his cousins, most of the press coverage in the run up to the wedding was about Chelsy meeting the Queen for the fist time and would Kate and William be there. I guess that makes it easy for people to question if there had been no Harry, Chelsy or Kate would there have been any deal and it can make Peter look like he sold his family. Then allowing themselves to photographed on their honeymoon in exchange for a reduced rate makes it seem like the used the wedding to make some quick cash. The whole thing just seems a little tacky to me but I guess it was their wedding and their honeymoon so it is up to them what they want to do.
|

06-29-2008, 07:32 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydragon
For some reason her parents did not want her photographed and therefore sent her straight home from the ceremony. I thought she was in one of the BBC videos but apparently not. 
|
I thought she was at the reception cause in the article I think Autumn mentioned saying something like "do I look like a princess"? to Lady Louise at the reception unless I misunderstood what she meant by that.
|

06-30-2008, 01:36 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost_night554
I thought she was at the reception cause in the article I think Autumn mentioned saying something like "do I look like a princess"? to Lady Louise at the reception unless I misunderstood what she meant by that.
|
Sorry ghost_night, I have read through the 2 threads and can't find a link to that, can you point me in the right direction?
|

06-30-2008, 01:48 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,052
|
|
it is in one of the pics taken of the Hello article.
|

07-01-2008, 07:36 AM
|
 |
Administrator in Memoriam
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,469
|
|
The sub-headline is actually " 'Do I look like Cinderella?' Autumn asked little Lady Louise" (Hello! page 91). Nothing about looking like a princess.
ETA.. the context and quote appear on page 78: "Arriving at Frogmore for the wedding party, Autumn might almost have thought she was dreaming. "Do I look like Cinderella?" she asked Lady Louise, the little daughter of the Countess of Wessex."
__________________
Seeking information? Check out the extensive Royal A-Z
|

07-01-2008, 01:56 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London and Highlands, United Kingdom
Posts: 10,910
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren
The sub-headline is actually " 'Do I look like Cinderella?' Autumn asked little Lady Louise" (Hello! page 91). Nothing about looking like a princess.
ETA.. the context and quote appear on page 78: "Arriving at Frogmore for the wedding party, Autumn might almost have thought she was dreaming. "Do I look like Cinderella?" she asked Lady Louise, the little daughter of the Countess of Wessex."
|
Thank you Warren.
That will teach me not to rely on a story without an apparent link (post 140)
|

07-02-2008, 02:12 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,779
|
|
^Sorry princess came to my head lmao I guess I was reading too much about the royal families the day I posted it. I'm not sure if the context was trying to say she was talking to Louise at the reception or they just combined the quote with that part of the story.
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|