I thought I heard that William wasn't going because he was working?
I thought William could not travel on the same plane as George?
or has this rule been relaxed?
The old rule was relaxed a bit when William and Harry were very young (William flew with his parents on that first visit to Australia and all of them flew to Balmoral when Harry was an infant for example) - but once they were school-aged or so then they started to fly separately. Of course we all know that you are far more likely to have a fatal auto accident than go down in a plane...I think The Queen gives permission for William and George to travel together.
I agree. Especially not when it's father and child. But I doubt they ever put the Queen and Charles in the same car or plane or such. Just in case.The rule was put in place years ago when airflight was less safe than it is now. I think it no longer applies.
They only have to advise HMQ as to where they are
Photos are now up on the internet from this year's Mustique trip.
Little Prince George is pictured walking with Nanny Maria and the Duchess of Cambridge.
Everyone else seems to have been swimming.
Pippa has a smart swimsuit.
I can't link from my tablet - and there may be some TRF posters who are not comfortable with photos taken during a private occassion anyway - but those who want to see them, I'm sure can find them.
And they're bound to be in magazines - at least in Australia - shortly.
PG has grown again by the look of it.
(P.S. I meant to put this in the "family" thread where the other Mustique 2015 posts are, sorry.)
She might have had alot of time of. I know for a lot of nannys for rich people, getting to go on trips like these are kind of a selling point. It might be that she doesn't enjoy it but I highly doubt she would work more than legal limits meaning she has had time off before and gets to go to mystique. And she is not allowed to work the full 2 weeks any ways meaning she gets vacation time there.^^ would have been nice to give the nanny time off. Between them all I'm sure they could have looked after little George
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community
Pictures shouldn't be published, but I guess their back from their vacation by now.
I agree if they had been a random person taking one snapshot. That is more okay. But these seem paparazzi to me and that's a whole other thing to me. Purposely following a family to another country to take sneak pictures of them. Just snapping a shot by chance feels much less intrusive to me.George is sweet and has grown up a lot, I think he looks a lot like both of William and Harry when they were his age. Even though the photos are nice I do agree with Dman that since this was a private holiday the photos shouldn't have been published, but it's very easy in the modern world to capture a photo of a royal or famous person if one sees them out and about. And people like to post photos of their outings on social media (especially if they've seen a royal or famous person on that outing), so I guess the photos were bound to be posted onto the internet eventually.
I'm not surprised at all. Not one bit.The thing is eveyr years there are snaps of the couple in Mustique, every year! I don't get the surprise!
The thing is eveyr years there are snaps of the couple in Mustique, every year! I don't get the surprise!
Mr Niraj Tanna is tweeting that there may be photos of the Duchess of Cambrige in her swimsuit - a bikini - being circulated in Germany.
If such photos exist, they will be out soon no doubt.
And the New York Daily News website has another photo of the Duchess, Nanny and PG from behind as they walk away from the photographer.
Hahaa *Applause*Well, Tanna would know...