I really don't know where this kind of writing comes from, or why it is acceptable to yourself, or this forum. I will not repeat the very unacceptable phrases used in this statement of yours, as has been done in many previous ones, but for someone who is keen on using proper titles in many other threads on these forums, it would be a good thing to do the same here.
There is no person in Romania named Michael von Hohenzollern.
The former king of Romania has a title, King, used for life by him on equal basis as any former head of state. As most monarchs, he carries no last name, but has adopted the suffix 'of Romania' for himself and his family, to make clear his allegiance to his nation. If you want to reduce him to an ordinart citizen not entitled to any respect for title or position, I guess you could call him Michael Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. It would however be just as wrong, as he relinquished his princely title years ago.
If I met you and told you my name was Anne Anderson, née Hanson, would you call me Anne Hanson from there on?
It doesn't take much to be respectful to others, and in most cases and settings, it is assumed to come naturally. That you seem to struggle so with a former King being King, indicates an unbecoming, but seemingly rooted lack of respect for others.
When King Michael reigned in Romania, the old constitution was alive, not once has anything else been claimed. After the monarchy, and the old constitution, was abolished, the King has sought to keep with the times, and encourage parliament to adapt a new Romanian monarchy to modern times, ie by including women.
Wow. What an awful faux pas for a King to make.
It has no legality in the republic of Romania. For now, it only has standing within the family, and how the different members divide the work and tasks they undertake. We can all wish for roads to be taken in different ways onwards, but since you've made it clear you don't believe in or wish for a restoration of the Romanian monarchy, I struggle to find any other motive for the denegrating that keeps on coming towards the former King and his family, than to sabotage the monarchical cause or prospects for the monarchy in Romania.
This thread is about Nicholas, the Kings grandson, who was seen as the future of the monarchy in Romania, and whos fate many struggle to understand. Without knowing why he was removed from the proposed line of succession in Romania, I disagree with the call. Maybe it was the right decision, but I and most others don't know enough to agree with it. As I've written many times, he still might become King of Romania if the monarchy is restored, because parliament and the people will decide in the end, when and if that time comes. That does not negate the Kings ability to write documents as head of the Romanian Royal Family, for parliament to consider, AT the time of a restoration.
For him not to do anything, would indicate that the Royal Family is not interested in a future in Romania. That would be far more incendiary and reckless. Until then, to those who oppose him or anything he does, he can always be attacked. If someone finds that so very necessary to do, at least do it with a tinge of respect for the position, and a touch of humility that there are other factors at play than your own deadlocked views of the Romanian King.