Royal traditions die hard in India - Columnist - New Straits Times
They have survived the loss of the annual Privy Purses that were compensation for their kingdoms' accession to the Indian Union. They were taken away through an amendment to the constitution in 1971.
The kings are commoners now. Most remain rich. Feudal mores continue. Modern outside, back home and among their erstwhile subjects, they follow traditions.
Many own huge palaces. The enterprising ones have turned them into heritage hotels and resorts. Thanks to them, the tourism industries of Rajasthan and Gujarat, where a majority of the princedoms resided, are thriving.
Most took to farming their huge estates, others took to industry and commerce, others took up government jobs, especially diplomatic assignments.
Not all of them had foresight. Many frittered away their wealth. Property disputes have dogged many large families that have larger retinues.
The new generation is into many things, from hospitality businesses to industry and fashion (
Raghavendra Rathore of Jodhpur), while promoting various sports and cultural activities.
Many contemporary princes,
Ajatshatru Singh,
Samarjitsingh Gaekwad and
Ranninder Singh, of Kashmir, Baroda and Patiala respectively, have taken to politics like their fathers.
Manvendra Singh Gohil, heir apparent to the throne of Rajpipla, Gujarat, was the first among India's royalty to admit he's gay. He works as an organic farmer and a human rights activist.
Ashok Vardhan Singh Deo, younger son of K.P. Singhdeo, wears a pilot's wing with Kingfisher Airlines.
Sociologist Dipankar Gupta told The Telegraph: "Royalty has become even more important today, since the mass marketing of Indian culture has given a purpose and meaning to the concept."
