susan alicia
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
- Messages
- 2,527
- Country
- Netherlands
In the meantime because we are not allowed to speculate someone else, someone completely different has been mentioned over and over again.
When I say "guilt" I don't necessarily mean in terms of criminal activity I mean in terms of the accusations of sexual activity being true and their impact on that person's personal life. It has been alledged in some quarters that the sexual activity was of a same sex nature so if this person is married and these accusations are true that would be even more devastating for his/her marraige and for their own personal reputation as this person may not have portrayed themselves as having gay tendancies in the past and would not want people to think this was the case.
P.S. I wonder if he/she will still attend the Diamond Wedding Service at Westminster Abbey even if their identity has not been formally revealed at that point as almost everyone in the Abbey and those watching on T.V. will know who the person is and it will take the emphasis off the Queen and Prince Phillip's big day.
Whoever it is (and as you rightly say, I could be wrong about it) is obviously gay and therefore once the blackmail offence is dealt with we're left with a gay royal.
Lionel Blair's married...< ed > As far as "Lord Voldemort" is concerned I don't think that a lot of upper class people who get involved in homosexual activity are strictly gay. I think that quite often they experiment with all sorts of things through having too much money, time and opportunity on their hands and I wouldn't be surprised if this is also the case with him if indeed he has done what he has been accused of in that video.
selrahc4 said:You are assuming that the allegations made in the tape are true. If the blackmail is dealt with and the result is that it's allegations are pure fabrication, then there is no one "obviously gay" nor are we "left with a gay royal".
Well, a tape doesn't lie.
Oh true but they're not talking in this video are they? It's all about actions.
Could be but if it was a hoax why not go for the seniors?
I think we need to clarify what is being claimed (my bolding)...I think you've got that slightly wrong. The video is footage of a Royal and an aide engaging in a sexual act. The aide also takes cocaine with the help of a Harrods card.
Then WHY would there have been even an attempt at blackmail of a member of the Royal Family? An AIDE is videotaped/recorded making an allegation and cutting up coke on a table top and that is it? If I was that Royal family member it would have taken me a month to stop laughing so hard at the absolute STUPIDITY of the moron making the attempt, that I would have been able to use the phone to call the Police.
Sorry, that doesn't even pass the stupid grin test.
I think you missed my point, there is obviously a great deal more to this and there is obviously a cover up underway. One does not blackmail someone over what an employee does or alleges unless the person is an idiot.
Huh? The primary consideration is a blackmail attempt whch has been reported to the police and is now being dealt with by a court in criminal proceedings.Once again, we have British appearances and "what will people think" to deal with as the primary consideration?
Not being privvy to the thought processes of said semi-Royal, but I'd imagine he did what most people would do if faced with a blackmail threat... go to the police. That course of action is neither surprising nor suspicious.... can you please explain to me why said Royal would react at all, in anyway to a blackmail attempt