what is with those sleeves?!!! She looks like she stuck her arms through giant marshmellows!azile1710 said:Astrid of Belgium
margotantoinette said:good lord! not only are her breasts practically falling out of the dress, but it looks like she tore open a feather pillow right before she got dressed and some of the feathers got stuck on her dress! trashy, trashy, trashy is all I have to say.
Couldn't agree more with everything you're saying.Waxxwing said:Well, I have to agree with those who didn't like Diana's dress. The material was beautiful but the design was overblown, overdone on top, and concealed rather than emphasized Diana's lovely long figure. It had no sophistication at all, and Diana herself mentioned years later that she hated it in retrospect.
I also did not like the Countess of Wessex's ensemble, especially the clunky pearl necklace that Edward designed for her. It was boring.
I also did not care for Pss. Caroline's first wedding outfit. It looked like an illustration out of a "Mother Goose" picture book.
Lastly, and surprisingly, I was very disappointed in Letizia's wedding dress. The dress itself was beautiful, but it totally overwhelmed her tiny figure. She looked swamped by it and the circular train kept folding over on itseld and making it even less possible than usual in these dresses for the bride to move, let alone walk gracefully. That dress was suitable for a tall woman, not a tiny one.
mmm, she doesn't look too bad on this picture though. In fact, she looks kindof intriguing. But is this the same bride who wore that sort of burka thing also? Or is this the burka, revealed? if so, yikes!saphills said:IMO, princess Kalina of Bulgary didn't look good at all.
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c261/saphills/kalinabulgaria1972-14.jpg
Source: Worldroots
Please, see her wedding thread... there you find all the answers for such a special and unique wedding dress:magnik said:Kalina looks terrible. Who designed her gown? Maybe she has done that - she is an artist?
"The bride’s gown had an enormous ethnologic value, because it was inspired in the Bulgarian culture."Elsa M. said:Please, see her wedding thread... there you find all the answers for such a special and unique wedding dress:
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f31/princess-kalina-bulgaria-kitin-munoz-2002-a-8799.html
saphills said:IMO, princess Kalina of Bulgary didn't look good at all.
"Bulgary" stands for Bulgaria...and this lady is Princess Kalina, marrying Kitin Munoz. She is the daughter of the former King Simeon II of Bulgaria.What is "Bulgary" and who is this fascinating couple in the photo?
Sira said:I agree with most of you, Kalina of Bulgaria could have chosen a better wedding dress. She looks terrible.
this dress is really ugly! I really don't like the veil... Who designed this gown?Elsa M. said:Please, see her wedding thread... there you find all the answers for such a special and unique wedding dress:
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f31/princess-kalina-bulgaria-kitin-munoz-2002-a-8799.html
hornsen said:I´m sorry to say that: but the bride herself is ugly. The dress is doing the rest.
hornsen said:I´m sorry to say that: but the bride herself is ugly. The dress is doing the rest.
Don't apologise. You're not the first person to believe Kalina is unattractive, and I seriously doubt you'll be the last. I agree that she didn't look especially wonderful on her wedding day -- she herself isn't especially (outwardly) beautiful, and the dress might have worked better in a lighter, thinner fabric.hornsen said:Ok ok, excuse me please. I didn´t want to cause a stir...
Well, veil was quite ok, but I agree that the tiara was too big.Solange said:Eugenia Martinez de Irujo (daughter of the Duchess of Alba) looked bad on her wedding. I mean, her veil looked so misplaced and the tiara was too big for her.
magnik said:Well, veil was quite ok, but I agree that the tiara was too big.