Hereditary Thane
Aristocracy
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2009
- Messages
- 177
- City
- Edinburgh
- Country
- United Kingdom
It hasn't (changed). Come back Magda Lupescu all is forgiven.
I was in London at the time & did not bother to go online, so I really have no idea. I do know there were actually two Daily Mail articles in the February 9th paper. I think the other was an editorial. I seem to remember one earlier in the week. And I do believe another paper had the article as well. The first article was back in January. Some MP raising the question...At least four articles if we are getting precise... Very well could have been in the Express as well. I remember the other was downgraded from the Daily Mail status..Anyway, I do remember I saved them all...Anything to do with the royal family I save. Actually the announcement stopped the investigation cold in its track, as it should have. It should have never started to begin with!It was in a number of online papers (otherwise I would never have read it). I read the Daily Mail, the Telegraph and the Express every day and I am fairly sure it was in more than one of those. I don't remember it being the day before but remember it going on for a couple of days not one.
There was an investigation into Charles' expenditure at the time and it came out in that investigation.
I was in London at the time & did not bother to go online, so I really have no idea. I do know there were actually two Daily Mail articles in the February 9th paper. I think the other was an editorial. I seem to remember one earlier in the week. And I do believe another paper had the article as well. The first article was back in January. Some MP raising the question...At least four articles if we are getting precise... Very well could have been in the Express as well. I remember the other was downgraded from the Daily Mail status..Anyway, I do remember I saved them all...Anything to do with the royal family I save. Actually the announcement stopped the investigation cold in its track, as it should have. It should have never started to begin with!
georgiea said:I read that Camilla divorce lawyer told her to put all her money in the home she bought after her divorce forcing Prince Charles to support her.
Could you perhaps expand on this accepting that it is based on your opinion?It has long been my opinion that both Charles and Camilla have been duplicitous in their dealings with the public and with their personal relations.. with Diana.. with Andrew Parker-Bowles.. and with their own children..
You can hardly compare a present day Duchess to Anne Boleyn.
What exactly have you got against Camilla may I ask?
You say in your post about her titles and that it does not bother you, so what have you got against her?
Why is she not suitable?
I know some papers tried to make an issue out of Charles buying things for Camilla but I was requesting substantiation of the bolded part of this statement:
But you if you wish to alter the past, the future will change aswell.
If Diana had not married Charles, thinks may have been very very different.
They only reason, if i am correct, that Charles and Camilla did not marry is because at her debutante ball or perhaps her 18th she "lost her flower" to ABP.
Charles gave Camilla two million in December. A little more than a week later, on Christmas Day, there was one more reference to the gift of two million PLUS the announcement that Charles had decided to marry Camilla. Since it was on Christmas Day it totally flew below the radar. I was surprised that there was no mention of it anywhere. It was the following month, late in January that the MP wanted an investigation into Charles' finances. I thought, "How silly. He has already stated his intentions of marriage, & a man has a right to spend whatever he so desires, especially on his future wife!" So really, it was ridiculous before it even started.Prince Charles gave the Duchess, I believe, two million dollars, in December 2004, as he was worried what would become of her if something should happen to him. I don't think HRH was 'forced' into anything money wise. The only issue with the inquiry was the expenses the Duchess incurred by living at Clarence House. It is very much the same monies for two to live together as one, as we all know.
It seems as if most people have just accepted and moved on....... After Queen Elizabeth accepted Camilla, so did most of the public.