I think Poor Diana did her share of ill treatment too. She was too immature and insecure for the situation she was in, but reacting with jealous possessiveness toward someone like Charles was bound to lead to problems.
Elspeth said:I think Poor Diana did her share of ill treatment too. She was too immature and insecure for the situation she was in, but reacting with jealous possessiveness toward someone like Charles was bound to lead to problems.
No.HMQueenElizabethII said:And will she be with Prince Charles on his visit to Australia this March too?
I think He needa an approval from the government to change her status, don't he. I think he will not do that because they are aware the bad rection from people will be.ladybelline said:IMO, Her Majesty prefers Charles to marry now, when she is still here and alive, because she has much more control of the events (I mean, she can object to Camilla 's Princess of Wales'style, to her becoming Queen, etc.) If she had always said NO to the wedding, Charles would have married Camilla once King, once his mother died...and then he would be free to make Camilla a "complete"Queen...
poor harry[b said:Reina][/b]
Here is a link from the PHarry thread. If you scroll down you will see that me and kinneret posted the same article. I bolded and underlined some things in the article so it may be easier to see the hot details
http://www.theroyalforums.com/forum...p?t=4731&page=2
Moonlightrhapsody said:I doubt that Camilla will get much in the ways of public duties and representation. As long as it's been since Diana died, she still has a pretty esteemed position in the minds of the people in the UK AND the world.
Moonlightrhapsody said:I wonder if Charles picked out this ring or Camilla. It's been said that he didn't pick Diana's engagement ring, so I wonder...
Warren said:I think she was insecure and manipulative.
Strong, discreet and supportive.Reina said:So what exactly was camilla
cut1me said:I think Diana was too naive, she was only 19 when she got married, i dont think she was cultured enough in the real world
Reina said:So what exactly was camilla
While there is no requirement that you should like all royal persons or public persons discussed at TRF, there is no need to attack them or call them names. There are ways to express your dislike or criticism of another individual than to resort to calling them names. It is childish behaviour that is not tolerated here.
Please think about how you use font sizes and colors. It can easily be overdone, distracting and hard to read.
Reina said:I guess it really paid off for Camilla that she picked an insecure, innocent, and naive young lady. Camilla played her game right and it is now paying off. Wow what a great lesson for everyone to learn. What a great example Camilla has set.
azile1710 said:For the record, none of these three are without mistakes. We now know that Charles was probably in love with Camilla all the way along (who knows when their affair started up again) and Camilla CHOSE at some point to start the affair. But Diana CHOSE to also have affairs, some with characters that, arguably, were seedier, uglier and more awful than what Camilla has been described to be.
Eliza
Elspeth said:I'm sure the Queen wouldn't want William to take the throne young like she did and have his family life sacrificed to the duties of monarch. I expect she thinks that having Charles on the throne for a few years with a Princess Consort is a preferable arrangement to having William on the throne before he's had a chance to have a life.
Elspeth said:I think Poor Diana did her share of ill treatment too. She was too immature and insecure for the situation she was in, but reacting with jealous possessiveness toward someone like Charles was bound to lead to problems.