marmi
Heir Presumptive
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Messages
- 2,308
- City
- -
- Country
- New Zealand
For goodness sake! she is only 35 year old. Still young and pretty. If someone think 35 is an old woman, then they should think twice.
Mary is 36 year old and not 35. She will turn 37 on February.
By the way, Let's be honest, each rich woman uses vitamin and botox injections, plastic surgeries in order to look younger.
By the way, Let's be honest, each rich woman uses vitamin and botox injections, plastic surgeries in order to look younger.
Will you please provide reliable sources for that claim?
Especially in connection to CP Mary.
Mary is 36 year old and not 35. She will turn 37 on February.
By the way, Let's be honest, each rich woman uses vitamin and botox injections, plastic surgeries in order to look younger.
A little self tanner helps Mary as well I think, I am a redhead, so I know all about that! Makes a person look more healthy. (No sun baking or tanning beds allowed!)
I think I'm one of only a few, but I believe Mary looks better with a fairer complexion. A temporary summer glow is all well and good, but I for one am glade it subsides with the 'tides' of seasonal change.
Her tan though is the result of no self tanner. HRH has just spent weeks off the coast of Italy and in the south of France with plenty of outdoors time. More than enough sun exposure I'm sure...
Like you, I think that a fairer, shall we say, untouched by sun complexion looks much better on Crown Princess Mary, who has got an amazing natural complexion. Although sun tan does not look bad on her, I am not keen on it.I think I'm one of only a few, but I believe Mary looks better with a fairer complexion. A temporary summer glow is all well and good, but I for one am glade it subsides with the 'tides' of seasonal change.
Her tan though is the result of no self tanner. HRH has just spent weeks off the coast of Italy and in the south of France with plenty of outdoors time. More than enough sun exposure I'm sure...
^ Funny, it was far from it when she was living in Oz ... so I doubt there is anything pure about it. Her skin was tanned, blotchy etc - all the hallmarks of sun damage, typical with Australian women who love the sun. Mary was a typical Aussie "sheila" as we are affectionately known. This new pallor she attained is exactly that: new.
Take a look at Mary's photos before she moved to Denmark, or even soon before, and you'll understand what I'm saying.
Btw, recent photos of Mary show her very tanned and more healthy looking ... so she might disappoint some of her fans who like her with the "Snow White" pallor.
I don't think she uses botox, or any other cosmetic procedure - yet - her untouched photos show quite pronounced wrinkles. Sun damage cannot be reversed with a few cosmetic creams.
Lets forget about "sheilas" its makes me cringe.
I think Mary looks incredible for her age. She didn't look that bad before she met the Crown Prince, but she looks changed now, for obvious reasons.
I love her porcelain white skin, but she does look wonderful tanned.
That's nice, but her appearance is very much adulterated with a lot of makeup, and whatever else. But, you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
My definition of 'pure' would be if that pallor were natural. Nicole Kidman's is and so is Cate Blanchett - both have always been "China Doll" pale. Mary's is not, because she was once very tanned. Her colouring is otherwise dark and she isn't bi-racial.
Re the word "sheilas": it is part of our vernacular, a colloqualism, if you like, hence my use of it. I did not indicate my preference or not for it.
marfre: no, I'm not 'way off the mark' - in fact I'm right on the money - evidenced by early photos of Mary and even some latter ones. Mary had/has blotchy skin, presumably from sun damage from the harsh Australian sun. Who knows how her skin now looks much better?
I'm a fair bit older than Mary and I can tell you that I look 10 years younger - so, no, I don't think she looks great age-wise (even with her limitless money and wherewithal). To me, she looks very old in her untouched photos. From a distance, like anyone, she looks quite good.
And, since I don't think using the word "sheilas" violates forum rules, would you mind not telling me whether or not I can use it? Or was that just a case of loose language by you?