texankitcat
Serene Highness
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,060
- City
- Dallas
- Country
- United States
Of course I was kidding.
Well that was just mean. Not that it couldn't happen which made it rather believable.
Of course I was kidding.
Of course I was kidding.
I'm pretty sure Kate says, "It wasn't all bad," and William feigns relief and remarks, "Phew, dodged a bullet on that one," or something along those lines.
The time of year that Diana and Sarah got engaged contributed to the few, very few. I think it was 2 or 3 engagements they did. The balcony of Trooping of the Colour, Easter at Windsor. Diana did 2 night time engagements with Charles, the famous black dress one and a red dress engagement, can't remember any for Sarah.
Of course both Diana and Sarah's engagements were announced as the Royal Family were ending their Christmas vacation and so the royal engagement calendar was picking up for the year.
Grainy 8mm video footage was uploaded to TMZ's website of Catherine Middleton sneezing. It was a dainty sneeze befitting a future queen, but it wasn't obnoxiously cutesy. She was wearing a black dress with pale blue ribbon trim and a pair of black knee-high boots, with a pea coat and scarf. Very chic. All the girls will want to make it their official "sneezing on video" outfit.
Some more official news
CBC News - Music - Disabled musicians get royal wedding gigs
Royal wedding: Huw Edwards to lead BBC's coverage - Telegraph
The BBC has chosen Huw Edwards to lead its coverage of the Royal wedding.
Just read that now too strange seemed like an interesting idea to use them thoughThere is a wedding planner called Peter Ferguson in Scotland but he is not known at Clarence House and told me he's not doing this event. about 3 hours ago via web <LI id=status_14717931552247808 class="hentry u-RoyalReporter status">The orchestra founder told me he was booked by a wedding planner called Peter Ferguson but he did not have any contact details for him. about 3 hours ago via web <LI id=status_14717599921213440 class="hentry u-RoyalReporter status">That story about the Austrian orchestra playing at William and Kate's wedding has gone around the world via AP now. Been told it's not true. about 3 hours ago via web
Per RoyalReporter on twitter, this story is actually not true- It's so hard with so many things flying around to know what is 100% accurate or not....
Well, Im not particularly enthused by this but at least its not a suprise. If William is happy then thats all that matters.
Kate seems like a sweet, down to earth girl. Is it because she is a commoner that some oppose this marriage, although so far you seem to be the only one not to happy about it. As long as "William is Happy". People felt that way too about Charles ("as long as he is happy" Unfortunately Diana was not. I hope Kate is Happy too.
For clarification on Diana:Yes, you're right. Diana and Sarah were making many appearances at the height of the social season. I'd like to have the opportunity to see Kate and William do a couple of engagements together before their wedding, but we'll just have to wait and see whether that happens.
loyalty, decorum, humility, courtesy, discretion...all regal qualities,
Humility? How can we know?
Discretion, of course. Not being discrete would have ruined her aspirations.
I think a lot of the opposition is that for the last 8 years she has appeared to do nothing but wait for William and people see her, rightly or wrongly, as a leech who chose a course at St Andrews simply to meet William in order to make him fall in love with her and then she would marry William - making it the social coup of the decade.
With regard to Charles and Diana - let's not forget that Charles was also unhappy in that marriage - people wanted Diana to be happy but she wouldn't be happy surely with a miserable husband and she made Charles miserable, just as he made her miserable. A marriage can't work with one partner unhappy.
I think a lot of the opposition is that for the last 8 years she has appeared to do nothing but wait for William and people see her, rightly or wrongly, as a leech who chose a course at St Andrews simply to meet William in order to make him fall in love with her and then she would marry William - making it the social coup of the decade.
With regard to Charles and Diana - let's not forget that Charles was also unhappy in that marriage - people wanted Diana to be happy but she wouldn't be happy surely with a miserable husband and she made Charles miserable, just as he made her miserable. A marriage can't work with one partner unhappy.