maria-olivia
Majesty
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Messages
- 7,999
- City
- Brussels
- Country
- Belgium
Queen Mathilde's Mother is not a Dowager , her Son is Student and unmarried !
Queen Mathilde's Mother is not a Dowager , her Son is Student and unmarried !
No Jonkvrouw for french speaking Noblity in Belgium as the family della Faille.
Chevalier et Madame de ....(first born)
Chevalier xxx et Madame de ...
Great to see the full version on the queen. No earrings, bracelets or necklace from Fabiola's collection though, so HM keeps us guessing aboutthat.
I forgot that it was only four months agot. So you are probably right and we shouldn't yet give up hope.Perhaps it is a bit early to see some of Fabiola's jewels It are after all only four months since she passed away.
Perhaps it is a bit early to see some of Fabiola's jewels It are after all only four months since she passed away.
Those close ups are gorgeous. But I'm not sure about wearing it in the original version. To me it looks as if the large dimonds have not connection with the base. They seem to be fixed inside the shapes of the top part. For the original version one would still need to attach the old prongs for the large diamonds.On the glittering royals Evnets MB there is a good clos up of the nive provinces tiara as worn yesterday by Queen Mathilde
Royal Jewels of the World Message Board: Two special tiaras......
After seeing it i think it should be possible to wear the tiara in it's original Version like it was when it ws gioven to Queen Astrid. One would only need to remove the arches around the top diamond's.
But the diamonds are seating on little diamond prongs. Would that not be enough to hold them.Those close ups are gorgeous. But I'm not sure about wearing it in the original version. To me it looks as if the large dimonds have not connection with the base. They seem to be fixed inside the shapes of the top part. For the original version one would still need to attach the old prongs for the large diamonds.
To me it seems that the little diamond prongs are part of the top arches. I can't see any gaps for hinges of breaks between the prongs and the arches. But on many other places of the tiara you can see that kind of gaps. That's why I think that prongs and the arches can't be separated and one would still need separate prongs to wear the tiara in the original version.
Sorry, but I am not convinced. I don't think that those are wires, but think that those are gaps of the hinges. We know that the base must be flexible because it can also be worn as bracelet and necklace.On HD pics one can see thin wiring being wrapped around the diadem in a rather clumsy way. It has nothing to do with the top arches. Also when only the base is worn, the wiring is visible. It looks like the wiring is done to fix it to a haircomb/base. I have the idea, for a lady in such a position, that the renowned jewellers im Brussels or Antwerp really can make a better fixation without any visible wiring...
See piture: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/d1/b5/e3/d1b5e304e3e9e1fbebb918e0573a9230.jpg
You are right. Also Princess Lilian has been seen with the diamonds attached to a necklace. So the diamonds can surely be detached. What I think is that they can't be attached to the base without either the arches or the old original prongs.But was the tiara not worn once by Queen Fabiola or was it Paola with the arches but without the deamonds inside the arches?
Sorry, but I am not convinced. I don't think that those are wires, but think that those are gaps of the hinges. We know that the base must be flexible because it can also be worn as bracelet and necklace.
[...]