miche
Courtier
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- Messages
- 811
- City
- N/A
- Country
- United States
Going through social media and their own website is a better way to connect with the people compare to relying on the tabloids who put their own spin on everything.
Fact: KP 1A was redecorated for William and his family. Millions spent on a massive renovation and redecoration and they use it as a pied-à-terre preferring to bury himself and family at Amner House playing wealthy country gentleman and hosting the in-laws.
Fact: When it was announced that William was leaving the RAF and taking a "gap" year people assumed he was getting his head around his destiny. Namely that of his father's heir! He didn't, next thing we know he's going to retrain and fly for one of the private rescue companies. Royal engagements would be few and far between. - So basically, nothing changes!
I understand the confusion, whether I agree with it or not. They tell the people 'we can't afford them to be full time royals'. But who pays for them? William has made it clear he isn't taking pay for his job. Not that he could afford his lifestyle on his pay. Clearly he is getting money from his father and grandmother. If they can afford for him to not work, how much more expensive could it be to pay for him to work?? If there are some major expenses that put it out of the question, then perhaps need to clarify this. All people see is a couple who is living off tax money but not doing many royal duties.
Then there is the whole 'finding his new career'. Even if he was Will Jones, a man who is 33 still 'finding himself' when he is married with 2 kids, would be questioned by many. Finding a career? He is a Prince, that should be his career. If that is not possible, again something that needs to be clarified.
Its hard to make a comment given no sources are listed. I mean there are 'unnamed' sources but that can mean its completely fabricated.
Anyone can write a story if they're not going to say who their source is. Without knowing, its rubbish to me.
Its just the same 'William needs to more' that the tabloids like to push
"He deliberately based himself, wife Kate and their children — George, two, and nine-month-old Charlotte — out of the public eye at the ten-bedroom Anmer Hall in deepest Norfolk."
Quote from the Sun article.
To me this says it all - substitute "out of the public eye" with "out of the stalking paparazzi's long telephoto lenses" and you have what really bothers the Tabloid press - William has successfully shielded his family from the intrusive voracious gutter press and they don't like it.
The Tabs 'need' those shots of George and Charlotte walking in the park next to KP, William and Catherine shopping in London or driving the kids to BP for swimming lessons, etc. to pay the bills.
The Tab press can snivel and whine and call William names all they want, but it won't change a thing, William is determined to protect his family and based on the Tab's complaints, it appears he's doing so successfully
What's missing from the article's complaint that he's becoming a 'gentleman farmer like his posh friends' is the fact that he is actually working as a helicopter pilot - a full time job for most mortals - plus doing some Royal duties - and of course there's that tour of India coming up.
miss whirley;1864641*snip* I’d like to believe that her editor is bullying her for exclusives said:Don't count on it. Her answers to some on Twitter were so smug and then Richard Palmer joined in and Blech!! W/out a doubt one of the times I wish we didn't have to see everything those you follow over there Tweet out to others.
I have an issue with some of your "facts". All redecorations were paid for privately. The public only paid structural repairs, which they would have done even if the Cambridges weren't living there, as the place was in bad condition, asbestos, electrical wiring from the 1950's, leaky roof. There's similar repair work going on at other palaces, I guess that's William's fault too.
You made that assumption that he would become a full-time royal. Nowhere did he claim that. So that's not a fact. He said he would be using the year to learn more about The Duchy of Cornwall, which he did. Hence, his course at Cambridge . The rest of the time was him exploring other career possibilities. He chose the EAA, and passed all the entry exams. He never had said he was done with flying helicopters, he quit the RAF because their SAR unit was becoming privatized. The last two years the SAR has been partially private and partially RAF during their transition stage. The transition is now complete. Once again, he was never going to become a full-time royal, Clarence House made that clear when they said the money isn't there for the younger trio to become full-timers.
Thank you for, yet again, attempting to bring in actual facts w/the extensive KP Restoration Work needed. This sadly is going to be another Myth that never dies and brought out again and again to "prove a point." Thanks for trying though.
Sent from my iPad using The Royals Community mobile app
I understand the confusion, whether I agree with it or not. They tell the people 'we can't afford them to be full time royals'. But who pays for them? William has made it clear he isn't taking pay for his job. Not that he could afford his lifestyle on his pay. Clearly he is getting money from his father and grandmother. If they can afford for him to not work, how much more expensive could it be to pay for him to work?? If there are some major expenses that put it out of the question, then perhaps need to clarify this. All people see is a couple who is living off tax money but not doing many royal duties.
Then there is the whole 'finding his new career'. Even if he was Will Jones, a man who is 33 still 'finding himself' when he is married with 2 kids, would be questioned by many. Finding a career? He is a Prince, that should be his career. If that is not possible, again something that needs to be clarified.
Then people look at the queen and DOE who are close to thirty years past when most people retire, still working hard and strong. Its natural questions would arise why Will doesn't step up and take some of the work load. The queen will not abdicate, that is obvious, but she doesn't need the work load she has. When a man who is 93 and obviously suffering major health issues, is doing more than twice the events as his 33 year old grandson, people will ask questions.
The royals need to realize it isn't simply tabloids. It is press and public asking these questions. In a time of recession, when people are struggling, paying for a 33 year old to 'find himself' in the country, may lead some people to wonder the real value. The time to bury their head in the sand and hope it passes over is done.
William at the very least needs to realize he cant simply hide his family. He doesn't want the press hounding them, then he needs to give access. Like other royal families do with kids. Other than her birth and christening, we have had what 3 photos of Charlotte? Even if they don't want to do press conferences like other royals, releasing photos more often would help. Bringing the kids out to the rare event, not having paps shoot photos when in a museum or polo match. It was commented that George was brought to events in Australia but not his own country. Right or wrong, these are concerns being voiced by the public and shouldn't be brushed off
George V however made one major change to the way the monarchy operated AFTER WWI - in other words as King. He made it a policy for the BRF to actually make an emotional connection with the people having seen so many relatives lose everything due to not having any real connection to the majority of the public. That is way he introduced the big royal weddings and then encouraged the images of the York girls with their parents and with him and Queen Mary - and later the film images. William wants to take the BRF back to a period before WWI with his attitude and that isn't going to go down well - the public need to feel a part of their lives if they are going to continue to support them. If William isn't careful he may get his wish - and have a 'normal' life with no titles or government hand-outs and having to pay death duties etc - in other words he may lose it all if he isn't careful.
Here is a quote from the Sun articleWhat has Harry to do with this tabloid attack on William for his way of life in Norfolk and shutting himself away from the British public and media? Harry's not mentioned in these latest articles, and I repeat again, any member of the BRF who attempts to ignore and sideline national newspapers in Britain does so at their peril.
The headline of the article is about William but the writer compares William to at least a half a dozen other royals.As for the future, William, Harry and Kate have made it clear they want only to take on patronages where they can “make a difference”.
The Queen and Prince Philip have 1,400 patronages between them.
This reluctance on the part of the younger generation to take on their charities means many will be left out in the royal cold. Royal patrons bring kudos and donations, the life-blood for all charitable causes.
Without them, many are privately worried they will not be able to continue their work.
I totally agree with your comments and it isn't just the tabloids. They give voice to some of the issues though. The British public needs to see each generation to build that connection between royals and public and it's not happening with the Cambridge children. I don't know whether it is KP who is being wilfully blind or William but there's going to have to be change or else the disconnect is going to become a chasm.
Just as an unrelated comparison, the Princess of Asturias, who is the heir to the Spanish throne and is already 10 years old, is rarely seen in public. My point is, I guess, that many royal courts are very protective of royal children and insist on preserving their right to privacy. I don't think the Cambridge children should be treated any differently just so that their generation could "connect" with the people. They will have plenty of time in their now normally long lives to do that.
Curryong,
What I find funny in this latest Sun article, is unemployed Harry does less than William.
So Emily Andrews wrote about William hiding with his family in Norfolk because she is such a fan of Harry? And the other editors of the tabloids mentioned in the Guardian article who hold the same views? They are also fervent Harry fans as well?
What I found on Twitter says that they are old - maybe from the Dec time period. I found only one - but did not look hard after I realized they were not new, new.Are there new photos of Prince George and Princess Charlotte about?
It's Monday morning here in Oz and the new magazines are out for the week.
"Woman's Day" has "Cute new pics!" on it's cover - with what looks like an new George photo - or maybe not, I haven't been keeping up with the busy young Prince's comings and goings for a while.
I'm off to the supermarket later this morning - I'll have a flip through.
Are there new photos of Prince George and Princess Charlotte about?
It's Monday morning here in Oz and the new magazines are out for the week.
"Woman's Day" has "Cute new pics!" on it's cover - with what looks like an new George photo - or maybe not, I haven't been keeping up with the busy young Prince's comings and goings for a while.
I'm off to the supermarket later this morning - I'll have a flip through.
I found this photo of George and Charlotte with the nanny. George has a cute red helmet and is on his scooter
http://imageupper.com/s02/1/3/S1456165806312456_2.jpg
http://imageupper.com/s02/1/3/S1456165806312456_1.jpg