Thanks, JR76. Your information changes the debate considerably.
So, if I understand it correctly, the 3 aforementioned schools are not state schools, but they don't charge fees directly to parents either. Instead, fees (or the equivalent thereto) are paid for by this so-called "community sum", which I assume, must be funded from local taxes, right ? In that situation, it looks to me like a government subsidy to parents who want to send their kids to not-for-profit private schools. Do those so-called "free schools" have selective admission though ?
In the United States and in many other countries, public schools (state schools for the Brits) are not selective, except some specialized schools that have separate programs in fine arts or sciences for example. The general rule, however, is that anyone can enroll at a local public school as long as the child is a resident of the school's designated catchment area. How does it work in Sweden? If the "community sum" is available to all families and assuming "free schools" are of better quality than ordinary state schools, then I would suppose the demand to get into one of those schools must be higher than the number of available places, meaning some sort of selective admission must be used. Please comment.
Finally, if the "community sum" is based on local taxes, does the amount change from one community to another ? If so, I assume wealthier communities should be able to fund a higher number of places in "free schools" than working-class communities. Is that the case ?