If it's true, no surprise. Andrew was not known to be particularly wise.
www.instagram.com
www.bbc.co.uk
www.bbc.com
I think Andrew will now get caught in the wave of evidence that concerns the whole government, Starmer could fall any day over Peter Mandelson, politician, lobbyist, diplomat, who had his fingers in everything and obviouly leaked state secrets to Epstein, just like Andrew. There will be criminal investigations, for sure.
On the funny side, there is at least one resident of Downing Street above suspicion: Larry the cat
Larry - Chief Mouser of the Cabinet on Instagram: "I can tell you that you will not find my name ANYWHERE in the Epstein files! And THATS a FACT! . . . . . . . . . #larry #westminister #epstein #cat #london"
12K likes, 184 comments - larrythecatforpm on February 5, 2026: "I can tell you that you will not find my name ANYWHERE in the Epstein files! And THATS a FACT! . . . . . . . . . #larry #westminister #epstein #cat #london".
I am sure this is true. With everything being revealed about Andrew not sure anything being said is going to appease people. Not sure really what people expect them to say.
The ling must be dreading every new probe into Andrew and what will be revealed next!
I would like to see royals, regardless of where they are, not constantly being questioned by reporters about the current Epstein scandal. Firstly, they cannot comment on politics, and secondly, they do not want to comment on matters concerning Andrew, who is still his brother. You cannot expect him to publicly disparage his brother. Charles didn't do that either; he simply drew the right conclusions behind the scenes. If royals were to comment publicly on family members, they would be lowering themselves to the level of the Beckhams or other celebrities who air their family conflicts and animosities in the press. What they personally think and feel should remain private.
www.bbc.co.uk
www.bbc.com
I agree. I am tired of some people commenting in the press and online saying that the BRF should apologize. Aside from the fact that the BRF is not a monolith, Andrew is the one who should apologize. There is nothing that anyone else can say that will be useful or will satisfy the anti-monarchists, who use every unsavoury detail of this mess to cast aspersions on the whole family and the monarchy.
Thanks for this and other BBC articles. Unfortunately, I’ve used up my freebies with them - if anyone has archives of this any other articles, I’d appreciate it.
Here's a BBC archive. Not sure if it's the one you're looking forThanks for this and other BBC articles. Unfortunately, I’ve used up my freebies with them - if anyone has archives of this any other articles, I’d appreciate it.
I share your thoughts! There is a thing like personal responsibility.
This is the reason why I stated before the removal of his titles that it’s not gonna work the press see a selling story and by no mean they would stop cause the title was removed, every headline is what I predicted “Andrew formally prince/ King Charles brother Andrew formerly prince” all of that and there is no conviction, if the royal family is going to be ruled by the opinion polls and bad press then it’s the beginning of the end!
I know he was speaking about Charles’s attitude to this truly awful mess but I took the references to ‘Mr Mountbatten Windsor’ to be from the Palace spokesman. After all, he couldn’t call him ‘Andrew’ or ‘the ex Duke of York’ and calling him ‘the King’s brother’ would have also sent quite the wrong signal.
www.hellomagazine.com
Exactly, if you caved once you will never satisfy the public opinion, unfortunately I see that the royal family is more likely to do an additional nonsense declaration or decision that would appease the public opinion for awhile, but then they would be hit again with us the dissatisfaction of the public again until the end!Hello! magazine's rather ridiculous take on it!
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor brings late Queen's corgis to Norfolk amid custody debate
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's private protection have been spotted walking the late Queen Elizabeth's corgis, suggesting that the disgraced former royal has retained custody of the dogs.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor appears to have retained custody of the late Queen's corgis, despite the stripping of his titles and eviction from Royal Lodge in Windsor. Pictured in Norfolk on Monday, Queen Elizabeth's beloved companions, Muick and Sandy, were spotted with members of Andrew's private protection, who took them for a walk around the grounds of his new home, Wood Farm Cottage on the Sandringham estate.
What do they want the King to do - confiscate the dogs?!
Thanks so much, Lord-of-the-Manor!Here's a BBC archive. Not sure if it's the one you're looking for
Palace 'stands ready to support' police in Andrew inquiries
archived 9 Feb 2026 19:11:10 UTCarchive.ph
Oh I agree with you 100%
Not exactly what you want to see outside a royal Estate which parts of are also open to the public and might put visitors off!There are indeed already problems since Andrew moved to Marsh Farm. People living there are not happy about it, and even put up "warning signs".
"A previously peaceful lane was swamped with cars as journalists flocked to the village, with a helicopter circling above, prompting one local to say: "I think if he has to come and live here, it should be somewhere that's quite secluded."
"There are houses that belong to the King that he could go to that wouldn't cause anybody any bother. The press are all down there. The villagers don't like that. It's a quiet village."
‘Safety announcements’ plastered around Sandringham as Andrew moves in
As the former prince makes himself at home on the King’s Norfolk estate, locals have put up warning signs around the area, calling out Andrew’s connection to Epsteinwww.mirror.co.uk
