The Daily Mail website has published
an "exclusive" report whose headline reads "Prince Harry's visa file to be made public after bombshell ruling by judge amid claims he lied about drug use". However, the headline and article do not appear to be accurate.
As far as I can discern from
the court rulings, what has actually transpired is that the US federal government has agreed to provide the Heritage Foundation (the private foundation which sued the government to obtain the Duke's immigration records under a law providing the public with access to government records) with redacted versions of the government's declarations to the judge regarding the Duke's files (not the files themselves) and redacted versions of the closed-door hearings concerning those declarations.
In other words, the documents that will be released to the foundation (and possibly released by the foundation to the public) are portions of the US government's arguments for why it refused to release the Duke's immigration records, not content from the records themselves.
Incidentally, and related to the earlier discussion about the Duke's name in the United States,
a previous ruling from the American judge in this case states:
The Duke of Sussex's full name and title is his Royal Highness Prince Henry Charles Albert David George of Wales, the Duke of Sussex, the Earl of Dumbarton, and Baron Kilkeel K.C.V.O. See ECF no. 7 at 1.