I am aware that Harry and Meghan are a difficult subject. There are supporters and opponents. However, her last action, where she talks enthusiastically about the young girl who is a Billie Eilish fan, should perhaps not be judged so harshly. She was simply pleased that her campaign had a positive outcome. I'll take that from her.There are plenty of negative posts on this thread about events concerning the Sussexes. As soon as something nice is shown, should it be banned? I don’t believe so.
This is from the background of Meghan’s Instagram post I believe. I think we can consider anything voluntarily posted to social media by the person in question reasonable to post.I know I am critical of Meghan but if this photograph was not released by the family , should we have it on here. It feels like snooping.
Fair enough.This is from the background of Meghan’s Instagram post I believe. I think we can consider anything voluntarily posted to social media by the person in question reasonable to post.
This is from the background of Meghan’s Instagram post I believe. I think we can consider anything voluntarily posted to social media by the person in question reasonable to post.
If it was published in a magazine fair enough, I thought it had been a background from the instagram . I really could not care less if the kids photographs are all over social media, it is the Sussex's themselves that only ever show back of head shots.If Gloria knew various rooms were going to be photographed then surely she would have removed anything sensitive, prior. It’s a lovely photo of a great little family whose mother is a friend of hers and Gloria quite obviously proudly displayed the card on the table in her home.
yes, something about this video doesn't land well. there's millions who lost their home. why post a video on how she helped one person get the most trivial of 'necesities'? i'd be more impressed if her video was about, say, the food drive she organised with her celebrity pals and all the food that they could donate to a local pantry. and why draw attention to the fact that she can send a message to all her friends to connect her with whoever celebrity she needs? i am sure there's some good in her actions, but it comes across as, firstly, trivial, and secondly, wanting to steal the spotlight by highlighting her connections in the backdrop of disaster.That was cringe. Once again Meghan makes it about her and what she has done.
New reel on instagram.
![]()
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex on Instagram: "Let’s keep supporting those affected by the California wildfires. Thanks to everyone who made this possible but most importantly, thank you to our first responders who are the community’s real heroes. As ever
meghan on February 4, 2025: "Let’s keep supporting those affected by the California wildfires. Thanks to everyone who made this possible but most importantly, thank you to our first responders who are the community’s real heroes. As ever, Meghan".www.instagram.com
Harry had considerably more money to hand when he married than Andrew ever had. Andy was reliant on his Naval salary, QM legacy, what mummy could give him and whatever else he could scrounge up from rich friends. Harry had about twelve million in inheritance from his mother’s will, plus annual Duchy allowance, plus probably some of the QM inheritance.The Billie Elish shirt thing being made public seems desperate.
I have said this before -- Meghan is in a Sarah Ferguson circa 1990's
situation right now. Lots of attention from the Royal connection, and everyone being told about a breath of fresh air a few years ago. Now, like then, it's like Please, for the love of God, no more fresh air.
These ladies both married Windsor sons who performed admirably in the military but had no money. I mean real money. Both ladies were expecting something different.
If Harry had all this money why did Meghan have to buy new furniture for their cottage at KP on her credit card, which is what they said, He also moaned about his father cutting him off, that is why he sold his soul to netflix.Harry had considerably more money to hand when he married than Andrew ever had. Andy was reliant on his Naval salary, QM legacy, what mummy could give him and whatever else he could scrounge up from rich friends. Harry had about twelve million in inheritance from his mother’s will, plus annual Duchy allowance, plus probably some of the QM inheritance.
And Fergie had known Andrew from childhood. My guess is that she knew funds were going to be sparse when they married. She’s just feckless with money. Which is probably why she ran up bills from her wedding day.
And, with reference to Billie Eilish, according to Neil Sean, it was apparently Harry who rang Billie and told her the young girl’s situation. After speaking to Harry personally, Billie said Yes.
Neil Sean, like most YouTube royal commentators, has no sources, and has been proved wrong numerous times.Harry had considerably more money to hand when he married than Andrew ever had. Andy was reliant on his Naval salary, QM legacy, what mummy could give him and whatever else he could scrounge up from rich friends. Harry had about twelve million in inheritance from his mother’s will, plus annual Duchy allowance, plus probably some of the QM inheritance.
And Fergie had known Andrew from childhood. My guess is that she knew funds were going to be sparse when they married. She’s just feckless with money. Which is probably why she ran up bills from her wedding day.
And, with reference to Billie Eilish, according to Neil Sean, it was apparently Harry who rang Billie and told her the young girl’s situation. After speaking to Harry personally, Billie said Yes.
So it had nothing to do with Meghan, !!!Harry had considerably more money to hand when he married than Andrew ever had. Andy was reliant on his Naval salary, QM legacy, what mummy could give him and whatever else he could scrounge up from rich friends. Harry had about twelve million in inheritance from his mother’s will, plus annual Duchy allowance, plus probably some of the QM inheritance.
And Fergie had known Andrew from childhood. My guess is that she knew funds were going to be sparse when they married. She’s just feckless with money. Which is probably why she ran up bills from her wedding day.
And, with reference to Billie Eilish, according to Neil Sean, it was apparently Harry who rang Billie and told her the young girl’s situation. After speaking to Harry personally, Billie said Yes.
Ah, the meeting of the awkward former spares club!Is it known if the Duke and Duchess will meet Prince Joachim (and Pss Marie?) at Invictus? I imagine they might.
They could exchange notesAh, the meeting of the awkward former spares club!
I actually thought I was being supportive of Meghans and Harry’s wishes to keep images of the children private, but it is obvious at times that you cannot please all of the people all of the time.If Gloria knew various rooms were going to be photographed then surely she would have removed anything sensitive, prior. It’s a lovely photo of a great little family whose mother is a friend of hers and Gloria quite obviously proudly displayed the card on the table in her home.
Meghan is 43 years old. Prince Harry is 40. By now they should have worked out their purpose in life.I am aware that Harry and Meghan are a difficult subject. There are supporters and opponents. However, her last action, where she talks enthusiastically about the young girl who is a Billie Eilish fan, should perhaps not be judged so harshly. She was simply pleased that her campaign had a positive outcome. I'll take that from her.
The two of them are still searching for their purpose or meaning in life. Are they royalty or celebrities, both or neither? Finding that out and how they define their position doesn't seem to be clear to me yet. They could theoretically live a family life in great affluence, but that doesn't seem to be enough. And then, they keep making strategic mistakes.
the sussexes have a long history of ignoring the advice of others so i wouldn't be surprised if they do have a PR team and chose to ignore their suggestions. or otherwise, they may have them and just be plain useless. the first is my guess, as given their long list of faux pas, they would know by now that they need a good PR team behind them and have procured themselves someone who is good, after so many years in the spotlight and so much criticism as to their past actions and way of behaving.Although the idea could be well-intentioned, and we have no reason to assume it isn't, this should have been done privately. Also in the Duchess' own interest as her public reputation is what it is -fairly or unfairly- and this does not help her. Quite the contrary. Any PR agent would know this, which made me wonder if they have any still.
Quite right. Perhaps on how to remain relevant!They could exchange notes
Don't forget "collaborating" with the British monarch. Like a tv co-production!If there is one Harry & Meghan have clearly demonstrated in the last 5-6 years is that they have terrible judgement. We have seen it time and again. Some examples of this poor judgement include comments made of the Bradby interview in Africa; the lack of grace and dignity in their exit from the BRF; the "Service is universal" comment; public statements about the BRF not owning the term "royal"; the Oprah interview; the clear threats in The Cut interview...... the list goes on and on!
Which is not particularly fair, considering one of them has a real job both in real-world terms and for the royal family in question and the other one doesn't.Quite right. Perhaps on how to remain relevant!