I, like many others, believe that the Sussexes are eager to hold on to royal trappings, despite stepping back and, more importantly, bashing the institution. So yeah, I roll my eyes and think of them as ridiculous.
I often think of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor going to Nazi Germany after the abdication, and that does not bode well, but at the same time Diana's trips to Angola and Bosnia, arranged by the Red Cross IIRC, can also be considered an ex-royal doing quasi-royal activities, and, at the time, she received criticism for those trips.
Time will tell if these trips are seen as a good thing or bad, or vary on a case-by-case basis. The Columbia trip seems less problematic than Nigeria, at least in terms of its intent. I hope the Sussexes are properly vetting the politicians inviting them, the activities and security arrangements.
Why the Sussexes are going to Colombia.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will travel to Bogotá, Cartagena, and Cali.
www.townandcountrymag.com
I read the link and then there is a link embedded in that statement
As I read about the conference I kept thinking that this sounds like Sweden's Queen Silvia's work, and lo and behold
Convened by the Government of Colombia, with the support of the Government of Sweden, UNICEF, the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children, and the World Health Organization,
I know that Government of Sweden does not automatically mean Queen Silvia, but interesting connection.