The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family, May 7, 2025--

[Ghost]

What do you mean by 'the case is dropped'? I thought he had already exhausted all his options, so the decision of the judges is final.

He can still appeal to the Supreme Court. There are no chances that his appeal would be accepted.

 

[Somebody]

Yes, so while there is officially one more route he can go, it is clearly a dead end. Harry said after the lawsuits that people should have told him in advance that it wasn’t viable, so hopefully this time he doesn’t waist time nor money on a dead end.

 

[Toledo]

What do you mean by 'the case is dropped'? I thought he had already exhausted all his options, so the decision of the judges is final.

I see two cases running in here, one in court and a back up in Harry's head. His obsession of not letting this go is going to end up in appeal.

When a court makes the final decision the plaintiff has to acknowledge the reason for this decision to run against his claim was his side did not present sufficient evidence to, as the expression says, to hold in court. He just won't let this go and accept to view it from the court's side and to understand on why they arrived to their decision.

I got this feeling he will attach to his claim to the bitter end instead of what any other plaintiff would do, see what part of the claim made you lose in court and discuss in private with the team of lawyers that drained his bank accounts on this case.

I'm not familiar with the UK judicial system, and I assume by association is similar in Canada, New Zeeland and Australia and if they have access to mediators prior to the case is taken and paid by public funds. For example, in the USA the lawyer mediator steps in when the stubborn client(s) insist taking the case to court when the prosecution team (also known as the State and the People's) sees it is not worth taking it. That it will be a waste of public resources and both parties should settle or drop it. On TV the most famous mediator is Judge Judy, a retired judge whose 'court' actually serves as a mediator to the real courts and doubles as a legal classroom.

Prince Harry needs a tough talking Judge Judy in his life to make him stop obsessing and move on after his loss. No, wait, he does have a Judge Judy to give him a tough talk: his dad and reality.

 

[Hallo girl]

I hope somebody’s given him a good talking to and made him see sense. Some of the stuff he said in the BBC interview was concerning. , I hope he draws back,

 

[tommy100]

Given the judgment in Harry's case states that it could not be said that Harry's "sense of grievance translated into a legal argument for the challenge to Ravec decision” it is unlikely that the case would go to the Supreme Court for appeal IMO. It has been dismissed by one court, lost on appeal to a second, sending it to the highest court in the land is unlikely.

The Supreme Court states about the cases it hears:

A case will usually come on appeal to theUKSC from the lower courts. A panel of three Justices consider written applications to decide if a case raises an arguable point of law of general public importance (occasionally these decisions are made following an oral hearing).

The judgement on the first appeal says there is no arguable legal case which makes it unlikely that it would go to the Supreme Court, as its not arguing a point of law as such as a judge has found is a case without legal basis in the first place. Likewise it is a point of law of "general public importance" as it is a case that purely affects Harry and his family not a wide group of others within the UK population.

 

[hereditarytitles]

News about the couple according to an article by the "DM"

https://archive.is/QzeIu

 

[Lori138]

News about the couple according to an article by the "DM"

https://archive.is/QzeIu

Interesting story, but will they listen to any of these highly paid advisors?

 

[Toledo]

News about the couple according to an article by the "DM"

https://archive.is/QzeIu

From the article:

"The couple, who left their roles as senior royals in 2020, have dramatically revamped the structure of their staff to make it more like the hierarchical system that has successfully underpinned Prince Harry's family for decades...​

​

Meredith Kendall Maines, a seasoned communications strategist ...will be at the helm of a team of 11, operating out of Montecito, California, and the UK...​

​

The MoS can reveal the restructuring, which will see each senior appointee reportedly earning a six-figure salary, will include:​

• The duke and duchess each having their own chief of staff;
• Harry launching his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months;
• Meghan's lifestyle business, As Ever, expanding its range of products later this year...

And here we go. My take:

You want to tell me, the hired staff in the Montecito mansion, here in the very republic of the USA, is going to be an extension or lookalikes of a royal court in Europe? Please someone give me a sitcom! Oops we did had one on TV called Green Acres with Eva Gabor as a Meghan type of character.

Re the Team - now that's good news so Meghan, who is the boss in Montecito, can delegate and possibly listen to advice of people more experienced to run a for-profit-but-still-not-profit-in-that-tax-form enterprise. Will she listen? I always hope for the best.

Re the six figure salary - well, there goes the Netflix money and I hope the team has something to show this time around. A six figure salary in the USA is really not much after taxes. No idea if its $100,000.00 or $999,000.00 but each has to produce back for Meghan more than the salary she will pay them.

Each will have a chief of staff??? For what, to assign chores like feeding the chickens outside and driving them around?
A chief of staff in the USA needs a staff to start with, otherwise it's called a valet for Harry to tie his shoes and a lady in waiting for Meghan to dial her calls to Serena Williams and wait for pick up.

In conclusion, I wish them the best and I meant that for the staff involved. But I've seen this in the TV series from the 1960s called Green Acres and I suspect we are watching a reality show in the making since so much people are now involved in the Duchy of Montecito.

That's my impression, they need a crew to interact with to prepare us for a new reality show in the making as part of this rebranding. Good luck!

 

[Somebody]

To me, it's mainly a confirmation that they are indeed very much going in separate directions with each of them having someone to run their enterprise for them. I wish their new 'chiefs of staff' a thick skin and hope that their 'principals' will heed their advice.

 

[Toledo]

To me, it's mainly a confirmation that they are indeed very much going in separate directions with each of them having someone to run their enterprise for them. I wish their new 'chiefs of staff' a thick skin and hope that their 'principals' will heed their advice.

@Somebody I want to know if they are going to make them wear traditional costumes at home, like the doorman wearing tails and the lady making them coffee using one of those little hats on the head!

This is taking a new turn, and a life all of its own now. That's why I suspect the need for more people to be in the picture could be there's a TV reality show in the making. They need to interact with more people and having a staff will both fill one hour episodes and also bring Meghan back as the center of a TV show, with everyone circling around her.

Let's wait six months, that's the standard film production time and editing before we hear another big announcement on the first episode of Royal Montecito titled Sussex, As Ever

 

[Somebody]

The original source is the DM; they'd like to dramatize things. So, I am not sure their qualification of making it more of a 'royal court' is necessarily a correct representation of what is going on.

 

[iceflower]

The Duchess of Sussex now is a beekeeper too.
From the body language it’s not that clear whether Lilibet really shares that passion.

Meghan shares clip of Lilibet - giving fans a rare glimpse at her

The Duchess of Sussex took to Instagram to post the sweet video where she could be seen holding her daughter's hand, walking towards a beehive.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Royalist.in.NC]

@Somebody I want to know if they are going to make them wear traditional costumes at home, like the doorman wearing tails and the lady making them coffee using one of those little hats on the head!

This is taking a new turn, and a life all of its own now. That's why I suspect the need for more people to be in the picture could be there's a TV reality show in the making. They need to interact with more people and having a staff will both fill one hour episodes and also bring Meghan back as the center of a TV show, with everyone circling around her.

Let's wait six months, that's the standard film production time and editing before we hear another big announcement on the first episode of Royal Montecito titled Sussex, As Ever

I think you’re on to something here. A reality show is all I can think of. So much for privacy!
What on earth do they need a staff of 11 to do??? Just more money down the tubes and more people they won’t listen to.

 

[Hallo girl]

Will they go to a ' friends ' house to film it. We already had snippets during the netflix documentary, when they filmed themselves somewhere. There were claims in the media before that came out that they were filming a reality show and it was denied but they did film themselves. remember the ' Beyonce' text and that is ' your brother ' moment.
Everything reeks of desperation, but give Meghan her due she does garner attention, by the way how many more 'rare' glimpses of the children do we get before the glimpses are no longer rare.

 

[Alison H]

From the Daily Mail article:

The duke, 40, is said to have been growing increasingly weary of the negative publicity he and Meghan have attracted, particularly in the UK

Dear Harry. If you don't want to attract negative publicity in the UK, it might be an idea *not* to slag off your family, the entire institution of monarchy, the government, the security services and the media, and to stop saying that the country is unsafe. It doesn't take a staff of 11 people to work that out, just a small amount of common sense.

 

[zarat]

The Duchess of Sussex now is a beekeeper too.
From the body language it’s not that clear whether Lilibet really shares that passion.

Meghan shares clip of Lilibet - giving fans a rare glimpse at her

The Duchess of Sussex took to Instagram to post the sweet video where she could be seen holding her daughter's hand, walking towards a beehive.

www.dailymail.co.uk

IMO it's another staged photo for PR effect.... The suits are new brand, no stains, no signs that it was used. And why only one hive? In such huge garden as they have there's definitely place for more hives.... And I will refrain myself from commenting on different toddler's height ... I will only say that it would be wiser to keep a toddler out of reach of the bees.... "Suits" or no suits.....

 

[Toledo]

To celebrate my new avatar, which I'm updating almost monthly, this is from 28 minutes ago:

Meghan Markle clears the air with delightful message on special milestone
By TN Web DeskMay 26, 2025

Meghan Markle sends strong message to UK with Prince Harry new update
Excerpts from the article

"...royal commentator Jennie Bond claimed that the "anxious" Meghan sent a strong message to those spreading the news by releasing a heartwarming photo on the couple's 7th wedding anniversary.​

Notably, the former Suits actress' lifestyle brand, As Ever, dropped a black and white picture of lovebirds, seeing into each other's eyes fondly.​

​

...from relatively humble beginnings, she has become a successful actress, and now an influencer and entrepreneur. I think she’s anxious to be seen as a successful businesswoman in her own right – and not just because she has lived briefly inside the palace walls and has a royal title," Jennie said."​

Okay, but the businesswoman part happened because "she lived briefly inside the palace walls and has a royal title". What am I losing in here from that statement? Well, if Jennie is part of the new six-figure 11-person team helping Meghan then bravo for her first take today to give her some positive PR on the news.

But then, the article was presented within the entertainment section and not in the business news category. I hope Forbes magazine covers more of Montecito in the future.

 

[taogg]

From the article:

"The couple, who left their roles as senior royals in 2020, have dramatically revamped the structure of their staff to make it more like the hierarchical system that has successfully underpinned Prince Harry's family for decades...​

​

Meredith Kendall Maines, a seasoned communications strategist ...will be at the helm of a team of 11, operating out of Montecito, California, and the UK...​

​

The MoS can reveal the restructuring, which will see each senior appointee reportedly earning a six-figure salary, will include:​

• The duke and duchess each having their own chief of staff;
• Harry launching his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months;
• Meghan's lifestyle business, As Ever, expanding its range of products later this year...

And here we go. My take:

You want to tell me, the hired staff in the Montecito mansion, here in the very republic of the USA, is going to be an extension or lookalikes of a royal court in Europe? Please someone give me a sitcom! Oops we did had one on TV called Green Acres with Eva Gabor as a Meghan type of character.

Re the Team - now that's good news so Meghan, who is the boss in Montecito, can delegate and possibly listen to advice of people more experienced to run a for-profit-but-still-not-profit-in-that-tax-form enterprise. Will she listen? I always hope for the best.

Re the six figure salary - well, there goes the Netflix money and I hope the team has something to show this time around. A six figure salary in the USA is really not much after taxes. No idea if its $100,000.00 or $999,000.00 but each has to produce back for Meghan more than the salary she will pay them.

Each will have a chief of staff??? For what, to assign chores like feeding the chickens outside and driving them around?
A chief of staff in the USA needs a staff to start with, otherwise it's called a valet for Harry to tie his shoes and a lady in waiting for Meghan to dial her calls to Serena Williams and wait for pick up.

In conclusion, I wish them the best and I meant that for the staff involved. But I've seen this in the TV series from the 1960s called Green Acres and I suspect we are watching a reality show in the making since so much people are now involved in the Duchy of Montecito.

That's my impression, they need a crew to interact with to prepare us for a new reality show in the making as part of this rebranding. Good luck!

My only or perhaps most pressing question is: just how vast is the Kingdom of Montecito (also known as one mansion) that it demands such a grand court of staff to keep things “operational”? Are we talking palace wings and rolling estates, or just someone to fluff the cushions between Zoom calls?

News about the couple according to an article by the "DM"

https://archive.is/QzeIu

"Harry launching his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months"

I have no idea what this commercial venture is supposed to be. As far as I recall, Harry has zero experience in running any kind of business. Consulting? Publishing? Retail? E-commerce? Tech? Lifestyle or fashion? How many books, jars of jam, or Netflix shows do he and Meghan need to churn out just to break even, let alone make a profit

 

[Somebody]

"Harry launching his own as-yet-undisclosed commercial venture in the next few months"

I have no idea what this commercial venture is supposed to be. As far as I recall, Harry has zero experience in running any kind of business. Consulting? Publishing? Retail? E-commerce? Tech? Lifestyle or fashion? How many books, jars of jam, or Netflix shows do he and Meghan need to churn out just to break even, let alone make a profit

Several years ago, he tried to do something in the travel industry when he started 'Travalyst'.

N.B. While looking up the Travalyst website, I also found news articles about Harry speaking to the travel industry today in Shanghai related to his Travalyst initiative, we might be onto something...

Prince Harry Makes Surprise Trip to Shanghai and Tells Crowd a Major Lesson He’s Learned in His Life

 

[hereditarytitles]

They have discovered that you can earn a lot of money through social media channels, but only if you are known and famous, and of course popular. It's a new model for many people in the world to make money.
I find that unfortunate because I often ask myself, who really contributes to the wealth of a country? Certainly not some influencers. The really rich and famous, e.g. decent politicians, rock stars, actors, exceptional talents in sport, generally don't need to get into the influencer business because they have enough money. That's why I'm surprised that H and M have chosen this way of earning money for themselves. The question is, do they need the money or do they want to stay just relevant?

Several years ago, he tried to do something in the travel industry when he started 'Travalyst'.

N.B. While looking up the Travalyst website, I also found news articles about Harry speaking to the travel industry today in Shanghai related to his Travalyst initiative, we might be onto something...

Prince Harry Makes Surprise Trip to Shanghai and Tells Crowd a Major Lesson He’s Learned in His Life

Can someone explain to me what exactly his speech was about? It seems to me that it's yet another topic that celebrities have discovered for themselves, talk about publicly, preferably at a gala event, but don't contribute anything personally. There are plenty of them now, but they don't impress me.

 

[Somebody]

The talk was about 'sustainable travel'; at least Harry can say that he's been 'in' this for over 5 years - although he has been rather quiet about it since he first started Travalyst. Growing from 5 to 13 partners in 5 years, doesn't sound that impressive either. Nonetheless, it seems he is back at it, so he has at least a 'cause' to focus on?! Apparently, there are more 'executive summits' to follow in which people gather from all over the place to talk about sustainable travel.

Quote by Harry: "if there’s one thing I’ve learned in my life, it’s that meaningful change never comes easily"
I guess, many people doubt whether his change was 'meaningful' but it clearly doesn't come easy.

As long as they keep accepting/taking flights in private jets, it will be hard for people to take him seriously on this issue.

 

[hereditarytitles]

The talk was about 'sustainable travel'; at least Harry can say that he's been 'in' this for over 5 years - although he has been rather quiet about it since he first started Travalyst. Growing from 5 to 13 partners in 5 years, doesn't sound that impressive either. Nonetheless, it seems he is back at it, so he has at least a 'cause' to focus on?! Apparently, there are more 'executive summits' to follow in which people gather from all over the place to talk about sustainable travel.

Quote by Harry: "if there’s one thing I’ve learned in my life, it’s that meaningful change never comes easily"
I guess, many people doubt whether his change was 'meaningful' but it clearly doesn't come easy.

As long as they keep accepting/taking flights in private jets, it will be hard for people to take him seriously on this issue.

That, exactly is what is bothering me and a reason of not taking him serious

 

[taogg]

Several years ago, he tried to do something in the travel industry when he started 'Travalyst'.

N.B. While looking up the Travalyst website, I also found news articles about Harry speaking to the travel industry today in Shanghai related to his Travalyst initiative, we might be onto something...

Prince Harry Makes Surprise Trip to Shanghai and Tells Crowd a Major Lesson He’s Learned in His Life

This summit in Shanghai is organized by Trip.com. I suspect the speakers or guests might have been paid, though that’s just my speculation, I don't have any evidence to support it

 

[Hallo girl]

How does Travelyst support sustainable travel , this is a genuine question I am not trying to be flippant, I do not understand what it is they actually do.

 

[Somebody]

How does Travelyst support sustainable travel , this is a genuine question I am not trying to be flippant, I do not understand what it is they actually do.

Did you check their website and their five-year milestone report? That might hopefully answer your question.

Without fully diving into it, my impression so far is 'convening power': trying to bring companies together to work towards a common goal.

 

[Hallo girl]

Did you check their website and their five-year milestone report? That might hopefully answer your question.

Without fully diving into it, my impression so far is 'convening power': trying to bring companies together to work towards a common goal.

I did look at it but it is word salad to me to be honest.

 

[taogg]

Did you check their website and their five-year milestone report? That might hopefully answer your question.

Without fully diving into it, my impression so far is 'convening power': trying to bring companies together to work towards a common goal.

The report keeps mentioning that Travelyst collaborates with a number of organisations.

But the only concrete example of how it actually works is a partnership with Trip.com and Booking.com, where they display CO2 emissions when users book a flight. That’s it? Are users really expected to cancel their flights just because they see the estimated CO2 emissions?

 

[Alison H]

How does Travelyst support sustainable travel , this is a genuine question I am not trying to be flippant, I do not understand what it is they actually do.

As far as I can see, they provide advice on which flights and hotels might have lower carbon emissions than others.

I don't find any of this very helpful. Choose direct flights so that you're not wasting energy landing and taking off again. Do they think people choose indirect flights if they don't have to? I hate having to change. I always get in a complete panic that I'm going to miss the connection and that my luggage will get left at the changeover airport. But there simply are no direct flights between some places. Fly economy class. I'd love to be rich enough to have the option of *not* flying economy class !!

 

[Somebody]

As far as I can see, they provide advice on which flights and hotels might have lower carbon emissions than others.

I don't find any of this very helpful. Choose direct flights so that you're not wasting energy landing and taking off again. Do they think people choose indirect flights if they don't have to? I hate having to change. I always get in a complete panic that I'm going to miss the connection and that my luggage will get left at the changeover airport. But there simply are no direct flights between some places. Fly economy class. I'd love to be rich enough to have the option of *not* flying economy class !!

The advice to consider the environment when deciding to fly directly or indirectly (if you have an option), is relevant imho. On long distance flights, it is quite often is cheaper to fly indirectly than directly. So, those looking for the cheapest option might be willing to change flights to save money. So, encouraging travelers to include not only price and time/hassle but also the impact on the environment into consideration is worthwhile. However, I am not sure Travalyst is reaching lots of people...

 

[Toledo]

The report keeps mentioning that Travelyst collaborates with a number of organisations.

But the only concrete example of how it actually works is a partnership with Trip.com and Booking.com, where they display CO2 emissions when users book a flight. That’s it? Are users really expected to cancel their flights just because they see the estimated CO2 emissions?

​

When traveling by plane the main goal on the search is to know the time the plane gets from point A to destination point B. Then followed by seat arrangements and if there's a need of a scale stop in between to calculate pick up plans upon arrival to get from airport to location. After the trip is done it's rinse and repeat in reverse.

​

C02 emissions are the last thing in anyone's mind unless you are that kind-of-people, as in the difficult traveler with a messianic complex who sits next to you, sees your plate and tells you should eat more vegetables.

​

Will planes that release carbon emissions be stopped from flying because Harry and Meg are environmentally conscious? Do they arrive at airports in gas fueled cars and tell the Uber "you should save money and buy electric so you can help us with the world's climate crisis"?

​

In the USA we all go to an emissions checks in our cars, I assume also mandatory for any fuel operated ground or air transportation. But with Harry and Meg, is not about the action to have people rebel against C02 and climate change but about, like everyone these days in Hollywood, to be branded as climate activist warriors.

​

Good for them and their resume, but unless they print and use Montecito cyber dollars to book our trip in a plane with gossamer wings, don't tell me where to spent more money to please them. And neither tell me to "eat more vegetables because they are good for you" if I don't want to.

​