The Duchess of Gloucester Jewellery


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
I think for Prince William (the younger around now) they are perhaps slightly removed honorary auntie and uncle characters and he and Harry where just a bit younger than their children. This couple sound like they where easy to get on with over the years at KP for most people, so it's probably a friendly relationship.

Prince William (senior) and the then Prince Charles where very close friends apparently (some of Charles' friends such as Charles Palmer-Tompkinson where Williams also or firstly) and it's his sad departure that meant Birgitte was juggling a collection meant for a wider Gloucester family but people didn't know what was coming. He may be sympathetic.

It would be nice if some pieces could be saved and kept here or go intact to other reigning Royal familes that may use them. Maybe the Dutch, Luxembourgs, Norways (may be controversial to spend big as they have PR issues now) or Spanish? Don't think the Bishop of Andorra will need one but could be a brave look - we should have another Royal family in Europe in a place that it fits with the past (not South East europe imported royals) I think haha... but more seriously, I also don't know how much jewellery the Grimaldi have as Grace et al where sometimes loaned things by Haute Jewellers in Paris.

I agree the tiara that was meant for Richard's eventual wife is really a museum piece but others including the Honeysuckle look amazing, really special works in a world of Tiaras. It would be shame if chopping happened. If I was a squillionaire, I would offer to help should it be needed.

I have a thought though - just if some of the huge jewels from South Africa and India where sent back, which some people could just possibly be thinking about as a guesture to the Commonwealth (OK I have thought about this and I'm not William) - perhaps there would be some room for other pieces to be brought across the central Royal collection. Who knows.

Another possibility for buyers, Presidential collections. Does the First Lady of the US or France have a tiara to wear, would they be welcome? Or international museums?
 
Last edited:
The Duchess wore her Art Deco ruby clips today at the Commonwealth day service in Westminster Abby. The pearls (both around her neck and on her ears) are mouthwatering!
 
Those pearls are wonderous, I would love to see the clasp on the necklace. And the ruby clips are gorgeous and patriotic on the blue velvet coat.

She has such an extensive collection of Art Deco pieces from her late mother-in-law, and she loves to wear them. Which makes a magpie like me very happy.
 
She doesn't get to go to events, so she decided to empty her treasure chest in one event and be done with it?
That made me smile. It appeared she was harking back to a previous generation when to be resplendent in multiple jewels used to be the norm. Usually her choices are spot on as in her latest appearance on Commonwealth day
Actually she and the Duke appear to be more high profile in attending events since Charles accession - so hopefully more opportunities to see this wonderful collection.
 
The Duchess wore her Art Deco ruby clips today at the Commonwealth day service in Westminster Abby. The pearls (both around her neck and on her ears) are mouthwatering!
Beautiful clips - are these the ones that Rose wore on her wedding day in the corner of top of the bodice?

Also I love the earrings - perfect delicate for a day event
 
Beautiful clips - are these the ones that Rose wore on her wedding day in the corner of top of the bodice?

Also I love the earrings - perfect delicate for a day event
The clips Lady Rose wore at her wedding are different. Still Art Deco, but set in diamonds only and narrower than the ruby ones. Because of the different proportions I don't think the ruby clips would fit into the diamond bandeau either.
 
The clips Lady Rose wore at her wedding are different. Still Art Deco, but set in diamonds only and narrower than the ruby ones. Because of the different proportions I don't think the ruby clips would fit into the diamond bandeau either.
I think they could be the same . If you look at some of the images in the link below, the clips look more delicate depending on how they are angled. Certainly, one image shows the Duchess wearing the clips with the emerald inserts in a similar position to how she wore them yesterday and they seem as if they are the same. However, if you’re right, it provides more examples of what a tremendous collection the Gloucesters have. And I don’t think we have seen clips with a ruby insert before - but someone here will be able to confirm whether this is indeed the case.

I have just added another link which seems to suggest they are different.

 
Last edited:
I think they could be the same . If you look at some of the images in the link below, the clips look more delicate depending on how they are angled. Certainly, one image shows the Duchess wearing the clips with the emerald inserts in a similar position to how she wore them yesterday and they seem as if they are the same. However, if you’re right, it provides more examples of what a tremendous collection the Gloucesters have. And I don’t think we have seen clips with a ruby insert before - but someone here will be able to confirm whether this is indeed the case.

I have just added another link which seems to suggest they are different.

The shape is very similar and both the ruby and the diamond clips have a stylised palmette design adding to the confusion. I agree that the solitaire diamond can be replaced by a lozenge-shaped emerald in the "original" clips. The ruby clips have been worn for a long time, but not as often as the other pair.

If you take a more detailed look at the two pairs, though, you'll see the differences. Namely the A-shape of diamond/emerald pair (A for Alice, perhaps?) and the flat base of the ruby clips. The ruby ones have 9 curved palmette leaves, while the diamond/emerald ones have 5 or 7 (depending on the angle) more straight leaves. Then there is the different design "inside" the brooch - the diamond/emerald version has two arrow-like motifs near the base vs. a step-like motif for the ruby clips.

Last but not least - the diamond pair is original to the Art Deco bandeau, but we've never see the rubies worn in the bandeau.

I know my explanation is not very technical, but I hope you'll see why they are two distinct pieces of jewelry. As you say, HRH's collection is really vast!

EDIT - The emerald pair is different! We can clearly see the design difference in the pic from the Guildhall from 2022
 
Last edited:
So does that mean there are three pairs of clips, or only two?
 
Back
Top Bottom