Not so royal? I would say not royal at all!Originally posted by Lena@Jun 19th, 2004 - 9:15 am
Princess Stephanie= not so Royal![]()
Queen Elizabeth II once said that Princess Michael of Kent is quote: "far too grand for my family." The relationship between the Queen and Princess Michael of Kent is very cool...but the Queen is very fond of Prince Michael of Kent.Originally posted by tiaraprin@Jun 19th, 2004 - 12:47 pm
Princess Michael of Kent--Thinks she is above everyone, including the Queen!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
She is the woman who loves to be a Royal and makes sure she gets her curtsies!!!
![]()
![]()
Queen Elizabeth II once said that Princess Michael of Kent is quote: "far too grand for my family." The relationship between the Queen and Princess Michael of Kent is very cool...but the Queen is very fond of Prince Michael of Kent.Originally posted by timtonruben359+Jun 19th, 2004 - 1:18 pm--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (timtonruben359 @ Jun 19th, 2004 - 1:18 pm)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-tiaraprin@Jun 19th, 2004 - 12:47 pm
Princess Michael of Kent--Thinks she is above everyone, including the Queen!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
She is the woman who loves to be a Royal and makes sure she gets her curtsies!!!
![]()
![]()
cristina of spain : very royal toocarlota said:sofia of spain, margarethe of denmark, charles of britain, felipe of spain, grand duke henri of luxembourg, victoria of sweden, alexandra of denmark, elena of spain: very royal...![]()
I think she's ok, at least she has improved...carlota said:mette marit of norway, : not so royal![]()
so has she served as a warning to her children? are they anything like her, I mean?trey033 said:Princess Michael is so incredibly full of herself...She all but wears a sign that says "Gold-Digging B**ch." As for the jewels she received from D of W, it's rather fitting, isn't it?
People like she are textbook cases of insecure-narcissists. She latches onto an 'aura of being' since she has nothing really to offer personality-wise. Which is sad, there has to be some redeeming quality about her, then again, maybe not!
Like the saying goes: "your purpose in life might be to serve as a warning to others!"
trey033
What do you mean? Do you think they are "good" royals? I think so!Genevieve said:Cristina of Spain and Alexia of Greece (in a good way because they are unpretentious)
Yes, I agree, and in the royal part I would add Letizia Ortiz. I think she has nicely adapted to her role, and it may not have been easy!!Genevieve said:Of those who have married into royal families:
Very royal: Mathilde of Belgium (though she is noble born)/Alexandra of Denmark
Very unroyal: Princess Michael of Kent/Princess Marie Chantal of Greece/Clotilde of Savoy
Aren't Canadians 'Canucks' and Americans 'Yanks/Yankees?'semisquare said:princess made racist remarks.....about going back to the colonies? whats wrong with saying that. in canda we are called yankees?
I cannot believe that she said that. I'm in shock.Alexandria said:Aren't Canadians 'Canucks' and Americans 'Yanks/Yankees?'
Princess Michael's remarks were considered racist because she told a waiter of African heritage whom she apparently didn't think was doing a good job that he should "go back to the colonies" and reminded him to some effect that she was a protector of the colony or something like that that reminded him of her Windsor/royal status. That is offensive and racist unto itself. Furthermore, she had no idea about his background to make such a judgement about him -- and who is she to judge him anyway?
But they are Royal...aren't they?sara1981 said:what about Diana,Princess of Wales and Sophie,Countess of Wessex, Sarah,Duchess of York and Princess Anne?
many people thinks Princess Diana was Royals and Sophie Wessex also Royals too if you think about it!
Sara Boyce
I don't want to start this discussion again (there are lots of post on the topic in the Swedish forum somewhere) - but the King actually never said that (at least not in the interview I know of, from the 21st century). What he said was the he thought it was very strange to change a law and then make it valid before it was written.betina said:The king of Sweden is very royal (but I dont like his comment about Victoria, that he would have been happyer if his son followed him as heir)
GrandDuchess said:I don't want to start this discussion again (there are lots of post on the topic in the Swedish forum somewhere) - but the King actually never said that (at least not in the interview I know of, from the 21st century). What he said was the he thought it was very strange to change a law and then make it valid before it was written.