Rebel Royals: An Unlikely Love Story - Netflix 2025


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
That's a good point about Martha. I was fascinated watching her reactions to some of his comments and antics. She seemed totally unbothered by anything. In some scenes, such as when she corrects him about Astrid being a Royal Highness, instead of a Majesty, she handles it without embarrassment or stress.

But there were a few scenes that made me wonder what's really going on in that relationship. He seems very dominant and forceful -- he answers for both of them, he directs the conversation, and unless he's trying to show how chivalrous he is, he appears to push ahead of her a bit.

During the horse show scene, Martha and Astrid sat in the front row, obviously the guests of honor. Durek was a row or two behind them, looking a little out of sorts. The voice over for this part is where he says how boring royal rules and conversation are -- clearly he doesn't think much of rules that have him sit alone without slouching.

At one point, Astrid presents Martha some gifts she brought with her. Martha accepts them graciously. But Durek materializes at Martha's elbow and says loudly, "I'll take those for you, darling." Good boyfriend or attention hound?

A minute or two later, Durek is rushing up a flight of steps to keep up with the princesses while holding the boxes, and he trips, sending everything flying. The men around him -- protection officers? aides? -- do not help him. Fascinating.

When the two women are posing for photographers, he suddenly hands the gifts to Astrid's assistant and rushes up to pose with them. (Martha could have summoned him, but you don't see that.) Astrid looks a little confused -- especially when he kisses her goodbye -- but she handles it all like a pro.

The scene reminded me of when Meghan pushed her way into a photo at a polo match cup presentation. These royal mates are not going to be overlooked!
 
Durek felt the need to declare himself concerning the comments about racism and the royal family. It's the media's fault again..




What I said in the Netflix documentary about my father in law not knowing racism has been twisted by the media. Let me be clear about what I meant.

In American culture when we say someone does not know racism it often means they have not experienced it in the same way we have or they do not understand the depth of its impact. It does not mean they are ignorant or unkind. It means their lived experience is different. Cultural language does not always translate the same way.

I love my father in law and my mother in law deeply. We have a strong and respectful relationship. They have supported me and my wife through everything and we share great love and understanding.

I am not a victim and I am not interested in playing one. I am an educator and my focus is always on love and lifting humanity higher. The media may twist words to create a story but the truth is simple. My family and I stand together in respect and love and that is what matters most.
 
There is now a pattern emerging whereby Derek is repeatedly “misunderstood” and then backtracks by saying “that's not what I meant.” Or else the evil press has twisted everything again. We've seen it all before...
It would certainly be better if, in future, he thought carefully about the words and terms he chooses when making public statements.
 
Durek felt the need to declare himself concerning the comments about racism and the royal family. It's the media's fault again..


There is a remedy for that: think before you talk.
 
ML and Durek have given a long interview about the documentary to Town & Country.
 
ML and Durek have given a long interview about the documentary to Town & Country.

A few things about this article:

-- Seeing the picture at the top (which is also the promo shot for the series), my first thought was, "Is he wearing Rayban Meta AI glasses? The thought that he could be filming things himself without people noticing would be alarming. (On closer inspection, I don't think they are.)

-- I chuckled to hear them describe the show as "touching." I have a feeling the moments they might think of as "touching" are the same ones I'd call "laugh out loud."

-- There's a moment in the Town & Country interview that illustrates exactly what I mean about the way he dominates. Not only does he talk over her, but it's all through his lens: "My bonus kids." Not Martha's daughters or "the girls."

T&C: What are you up to now?
DV: We just had our one year anniversary where I’ve swept my beautiful, amazing wife off on a secret vacation that was really beautiful. But for me right now, I’m living here in Norway—
ML: We are living in --
DV: We are living in Norway together with my bonus kids. Where we go from here, it really depends, but right now we’re focusing on the children and their needs and what supports them right now with school and everything. Where we decide to go from there, it’s yet to be seen, but I know whatever we do do, we’re here to make a mark on this planet for the people—to hold space for the people and hold space for community. And me and Märtha’s focus is always about the people and how we can let people know that they’re loved unconditionally, there’s space for them to exist, and that no matter who they are, there’s space on this planet for them to be loved and to be seen.

-- It happens again in the next question when he demonstrates that he's the one making the decisions:

T&C: What's next for you?
ML: Well, there's a Netflix film I heard.
DV: We don’t quite know what’s going to happen after that! We have a blind spot from this point, from this junction. But we are definitely excited to share our love story, to see how it connects with people globally. And where it goes from there is it’s up to the divine, it’s up to the people, and it’s up to what God has in plan for us.
 
"and it’s up to what God has in plan for us."
Eh... - As an ex-pharao isn't he sort of divine himself?
What God is he talking about? Anubis?
If he is Christian I don't recall the Bible mentioning devout reptiles as he ID himself as being.
I think a theological show with Durek could be most interesting! I bet it would end up with him declaring: God calls me God.
 
Haakon was asked about the documentary and the "agreement" from the NRF. I rolled my eyes quite a few times,

"What methods do you have to use to achieve the distinction you want? asks NRK.

- We want there to be a clearer distinction between the activities of the Royal House and Princess Märtha Louise and Durek Verrett's projects and commercial activities. I hope we can achieve that a little better. Now they have issued a statement saying that they are concerned about the integrity of the agreement that we have from 2022, so there is something to build on.

- Can one more conversation be enough, all the time we see that the couple is breaking the agreement that has been made? Isn't there a risk that the authority of both the Crown Prince and the King will be weakened, if only conversation is the answer? NRK continues.

- There you point out a bit of a challenge, but there is no good alternative to that, we have to try to figure it out, the Crown Prince replies, and reiterates that the couple has stated that they intend to respect the agreement.
...
- I think I should refrain from judging it, but I don't think it distinguishes well enough, unfortunately, between the royal house's activities and the project and the commercial side of Princess Märtha Louise and Durek Verrett's activities."

 
Martha and Durek have the Norwegian family in the same position that Meghan and Harry have put the British in. If they slam the door, the royals know that there's absolutely nothing from keeping M&D or M&H from making more shows, publishing more tell-alls, giving more interviews, and so on.

But letting things slide a little and bringing them back to the table again, the royal houses keep at least a tiny bit of hope that they might keep some influence over them.
 
Nettavisen:
"Rebel Royals" is the most watched film in both Norway and Denmark over the past week. In Sweden, the film is in fourth place.
But out in the world, the picture looks completely different: The documentary is not on the list of the most watched films on the global top ten list.
The documentary is not on the top ten list in Durek's home country, the United States. Nor is the film among the ten most watched films last week in royalist countries like the United Kingdom and Germany. In Iceland, the documentary is in fifth place. In Estonia and Finland, it is in ninth place. In Luxembourg, it is in tenth place.

Rebel Royals_ An Unlikely Love Story (2025) - Ratings - IMDb
 
Harald had been asked if he saw the documentary and about the broken agreements. There will be more talks :rolleyes:

"– I'm not sure if I should make any comments about this one. I've seen the film, but others think I should judge its content.

– How does the king react to the fact that the princess and Durek Verrett have broken the agreement with the family and with the royal house?

– We have established that. We have to live on. We will try to do something about this through repeated conversations. I think they are more in line with us than it seems, says the king."

I'll highlight this part. It seems it will be Haakon's issue to deal with.

"– What value do the talks have when the agreement is broken time and time again?
– We will have to live with this for the rest of our lives. The Crown Prince and Princess will have to live with it. We have to find a solution."

It sounds to me like no one in the NRF knows about Responsibility, Consequences, Respect.

Martha Louise will be Haakon's issue to "deal" with.
Marius will be Ingrid's issue to "deal" with.
:(
 
Sonja was asked about it

"– What does the Queen think of the documentary?
– I think I leave that to others to decide.
– What does the Queen think of the picture drawn by the royal couple?
– I don't know much about that, because I haven't seen that documentary directly. Because I was in the mountains, and there was absolutely no "connection". So I can't say anything about that.
– But I feel that there is a great warmth coming from people. And that makes us very grateful. It is very, very nice, says the Queen, placing her hand over her heart."

"Queen Sonja goes to great lengths to say that a clearer distinction is needed between the Royal House and Princess Märtha Louise's professional life.
– I think we have to take the time to help. That's the only thing. Make a clear distinction between what is our task as a royal house, and the difference over Märtha and Durek's professional lives."

 
Take the time to help? Have the Royal couple not heard of 'tough love'? ML and her Shaman have had many discussions and flagrantly break all of the rules laid out for them. There is no helping them understand these rules, they know them and don't care.
 
Take the time to help? Have the Royal couple not heard of 'tough love'? [...]

To be fair to the King, the same question about "tough love" could and should be posed to the public, since (as discussed in the Norwegian royals subforum) the majority of the Norwegian public apparently believes it would be terribly unfair if Princess Märtha Louise were stripped of her right to succeed to the throne. If even that step is seen as too harsh by the public (when Princess Märtha Louise maintains that she does not want to be queen anyway!), it is difficult to see how the King could get much tougher without incurring the wrath of the public.
 
Don't a majority of Norwegian's believe ML should be stripped of her Princess title? I thought I had read that in several places - if so that would be a good place to start with drawing a distinction between ML and the Royal House (IMO).
 
Don't a majority of Norwegian's believe ML should be stripped of her Princess title? I thought I had read that in several places - if so that would be a good place to start with drawing a distinction between ML and the Royal House (IMO).

Yes, that's right. However, for reasons I won't belabor here but have explained in other threads, I find it contradictory and irrational for the public to argue that her being Queen would be fine but her being Princess is not, so frankly I can't see how public opinion could be converted into any logical scheme.
 
... I find it contradictory and irrational for the public to argue that her being Queen would be fine but her being Princess is not, so frankly I can't see how public opinion could be converted into any logical scheme.

If I understand you correctly, then the Norwegian public does not want to see the Princess getting stripped of her right to become Queen. But I wonder if this is the same as wanting her to become Queen - I am not sure that good folks of Norway want to see her right, a possibility, becoming a reality.

But I would like to see a King Shaman, what would be necessarily the future with a Queen Märtha Luise.

Ok, as a member of the Royal Forums I should probably show more seriousness towards the institution of Monarchy, but King Shaman - that is really entertainment and funny!
 
Don't a majority of Norwegian's believe ML should be stripped of her Princess title? I thought I had read that in several places - if so that would be a good place to start with drawing a distinction between ML and the Royal House (IMO).
They do actually. I saw the headlines of an article (BT, I believe) stating that some 80 % of the Norwegians wanted King Harald to strip ML of her Princess-title.
 
Nettavisen:
"Rebel Royals" is the most watched film in both Norway and Denmark over the past week. In Sweden, the film is in fourth place.
But out in the world, the picture looks completely different: The documentary is not on the list of the most watched films on the global top ten list.
The documentary is not on the top ten list in Durek's home country, the United States. Nor is the film among the ten most watched films last week in royalist countries like the United Kingdom and Germany. In Iceland, the documentary is in fifth place. In Estonia and Finland, it is in ninth place. In Luxembourg, it is in tenth place.

Rebel Royals_ An Unlikely Love Story (2025) - Ratings - IMDb

I’m not at all surprised this isn’t being heavily viewed in the US. The number of people who know Norway has a monarchy, much less who Durek is pretty low imo.

The headlines dealing with Marius have boosted some people’s knowledge, but over all, probably not by much.
 
So to me there is a win-win for Harald - strip ML of her Princess title and allow her to stay in the line of the throne (removal from which is not something I think has ever been considered)
The reality is ML's daughters are already in line of succession to the throne without being Princesses so its no different from that. They clearly have a life set up for them away from royal duties and ML likewise, wants a life incompatible with royal duties so why not take away the title?
 
There were times when Durek was saying things like I didn't know I had to wear a suit and I was thinking could you not have searched the internet if Martha wouldn't tell you or just wear a shirt and pants not a kimono and cowboy boots?
Add to that the defamation of his elderly parents and his alleged ignorance of how life and etiquette work in a European royal family, and it's borderline unacceptable.

Of course, as an American, he didn't know how things work with European royals, and Märtha obviously didn't prepare him enough (parallels to Harry and Meghan). But that doesn't give him and her the right to complain about everything and make fun of it.
As an American, generally, and a Black American, specifically, this is what annoys me so much about Durek and Meghan. Other than gossip about the British royal family, most Americans pay little attention to royalty. And even those who eat up gossip about the BRF know next to nothing about royal protocol or how the royal family functions.

That's fine if you're an average American, but not if you're marrying into a royal family. In that case, it's incumbent upon you to take the time and effort to learn all the things you need to know. That seems doubly important if you're going to be the first person of color to marry into the family and you know your actions will be even more scrutinized because of it.

Both Martha and Harry were horribly negligent for not educating (or seeking education for) their partners in royal protocol and the culture of their countries, but "Nobody told me" is not an excuse for not knowing. Even if the NRF and BRF did nothing to help them (which I don't believe to be the case), both Durek and Meghan ran in circles with the kind of people who could have pointed them in the direction of people who could've provided them the appropriate education.

There are so many Black Americans who would've taken it upon themselves to learn and prepare for their new roles and behaved impeccably. Instead we got these two, who were both unsuited for royal life, albeit for different reasons, none of which have to do with their race. But given how easily (and unfairly) people ascribe the actions of one Black person to all of us, it's been embarrassing to listen to their very public complaints, particularly with the knowledge that neither or them put themselves in a position to succeed because they were both so narcissistically obsessed with their own specialness.
 
To be fair to the King, the same question about "tough love" could and should be posed to the public, since (as discussed in the Norwegian royals subforum) the majority of the Norwegian public apparently believes it would be terribly unfair if Princess Märtha Louise were stripped of her right to succeed to the throne.
That ship has already sailed though, hasn't it? The time to strip ML and her descendants of their right to succeed to the throne was when ML married Durek. It would have sufficed for the King to deny consent to the marriage and ML and her descendants would have forefeited their succession rights if she had gotten married anyway. Now that the marriage has been consented to, other than ML perhaps ceasing to be a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, I don't see how she can be stripped of her succession rights, which are guaranteed by the Norwegian constitution itself.
 
That ship has already sailed though, hasn't it? The time to strip ML and her descendants of their right to succeed to the throne was when ML married Durek. It would have sufficed for the King to deny consent to the marriage and ML and her descendants would have forefeited their succession rights if she had gotten married anyway. Now that the marriage has been consented to, other than ML perhaps ceasing to be a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, I don't see how she can be stripped of her succession rights, which are guaranteed by the Norwegian constitution itself.

Yes, I was referring to public opinion at that time (though I don't see any reason to think the public regrets their stance).
 
Trond Norén Isaksen at his Instagram about his column in Aftenposten among other things:
"It was sad to see the King’s meeting with the press following the film about Princess Märtha Louise and Durek Verrett....
It is now time for leadership and action and to end the internal seminars that go on for years without solving anything. If even this latest and so far gravest violation of the agreement is allowed to pass the Princess and her husband will have learnt that they can do whatever they want without consequences, the King’s authority will be further weakened, the monarchy’s integrity will continue to be undermined and the royal family must be prepared for their work to be derailed and overshadowed at any time in the future, while public engagements will have to be spent answering questions about the never-ending circus rather than the causes the royals have come to promote.
The King’s motto is «Everything for Norway», which means that the good of the nation and the monarchy must come before personal interests. To create the distance between the monarchy and Märtha Louise and Verrett’s activities that years of talk have failed to produce it is necessary that the King strips his disloyal daughter of her royal title, that he makes a clearer distinction between his roles as monarch and father and that Märtha Louise and Verrett change their behaviour."
 
Not sure whether this ought to be discussed here or in another thread (e.g., the couple’s news thread, the royal family’s general news thread, or the Questions about Titles thread or Future of the Monarchy thread in the Norway subforum), so I ask the moderators to move my post if appropriate.

I wonder why Mr. Norén Isaksen believes the royal house’s “work [being] derailed and overshadowed” with “questions about the never-ending circus” would be solved if King Harald V stripped Princess Märtha Louise of her title? Durek Verrett is already untitled. So is Marius Borg Høiby. But that hasn’t avoided “[royal] work [being] derailed and overshadowed” with “questions about the never-ending circus” in their cases.
 
Not sure whether this ought to be discussed here or in another thread (e.g., the couple’s news thread, the royal family’s general news thread, or the Questions about Titles thread or Future of the Monarchy thread in the Norway subforum), so I ask the moderators to move my post if appropriate.

I wonder why Mr. Norén Isaksen believes the royal house’s “work [being] derailed and overshadowed” with “questions about the never-ending circus” would be solved if King Harald V stripped Princess Märtha Louise of her title? Durek Verrett is already untitled. So is Marius Borg Høiby. But that hasn’t avoided “[royal] work [being] derailed and overshadowed” with “questions about the never-ending circus” in their cases.
Maybe he means other family member's engagements wouldn't be filled with questions about "Should Martha be stripped of her titles? Have they abused her titles? Blah blah blah, title? " Maybe he feels if the king strips her title, at least 50 percent of the questions about her and her husband will stop? :lol: :D
 
I think the greater concern would be that this movie -- and the sideshow that goes with it -- push the royal house further into "celebrity mode." A monarchy where royal status stems from cultural heritage and selfless hard work for the state makes sense. One where members are merchandizing themselves, trolling for "likes," and staging bizarre public antics for business and attention does not.
 
I think the main problem is Märtha's proximity to the royal family; she is, apart from Ingrid and Sverre, second in line to the throne. This family doesn't have many other spares.

We know that other royal members of European monarchies who aren't in the direct line of succession are now earning money as "influencers" or have extra income by making themselves available for certain brands they wear or promote. Just think of their own daughter, Leah, who earns her money as an "influencer." I haven't heard that she's pursuing an professional career, apprenticeship or a degree, so that's probably not necessary.

So they may have thought, why shouldn't we also earn money in this area? They don't see at all, and by that I mean Martha, that she has a certain responsibility as a member of the royal family, who is still in line of succession.

She's stepped down from all the positions she once held and probably thinks she's now free to do whatever she wants. The opportunity to earn a lot of money from it is tempting.

An alternative would be, for example, her working again as a physiotherapist or as an "angel consultant," and him working as a "shaman" in Norway, as he used to earn his money in the past. They could live a quiet happy secluded life and treasure their "great love".
The problem is, that wouldn't be interesting enough for Netflix, Hello, or any other celebrity papers or streaming companies contracts.

Or, even better, they could use their unusual love story to advocate for tolerance, acceptance of interracial marriages, reduce existing prejudices. I can think of many causes where they could have an influence on society and social problems in that specific area.
One of the most striking things for me was Durek's complaint about how Märthas parents were speechless about his clothes when they first met him.
If he hadn't been black and had worn that outfit, they would have been surprised too. What did he expect from a royal couple in their late Eighties?
How very self centered he is, and Märtha as well.

So they figured they could make real money with their extraordinary story, "Black Shaman Marries Norwegian Princess." And all of it is about money and fame!
Whether this damages the family's reputation doesn't seem to concern them at all. And when criticism comes, they attribute it to racism, a lack of understanding of unusual relationships, etc. That's how you they are seeing the world and feel justified in doing so.
 
Back
Top Bottom