Prinsara
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
- Messages
- 5,312
- City
- A place to grow
- Country
- Canada
Is he accused of solicitation or actual trafficking?
Is he accused of solicitation or actual trafficking?
He pays rent for his apartment at Sjöflygeln, as does everyone (except princess Madeleine), who lives at the houses and apartments which the King has the right of disposal. At Drottningholm Palace area and close to it in different houses with the King's right of disposal live a lot of the court staff and people who have retired from their work at the court. For instance the former Marshal of the Realm Ingemar Eliasson and queen Silvia's chambermaid Anne Tovar.
Patrick's son Leopold lived with him at Drottningholm for some time but he has moved away.
Why is he allowed to live there if he has no ties to the court (ie retired court worker) ? Can the average Oscar Johannson rent an apartment there?
Why is he allowed to live there if he has no ties to the court (ie retired court worker) ? Can the average Oscar Johannson rent an apartment there?
He was accused of buying sex from a woman that worked at the massage parlor. While we don't know if the woman in question was trafficked other women working there are suspected to have been.
In Sweden paying for sex is illegal.
What kind of a crime? Felony, misdemeanor, how many years does someone get in jail?
And so there are technically no prostitutes in Sweden?
In Sweden, it's legal to sell - but not but - sex. Many countries have a reverse legislation. The penalty ranges from a substantial fine to a year in prison.
I see; so it's fine to purchase from someone who is selling (and I suppose registered?) but not to just offer money to anyone for it?
No, it's always illegal to buy sex. And you can't have a regular job as a sex worker (registered), but it's not illegal to sell either. So the women at the massage parlor don't risk anything by admitting to the police that they sold sex, but the men who bought them certainly did something illegal. Several more or less know swedish men are implicated in the same case, one of them a quite well known actor who admitted he was guilty. He got away with a fine, since he admitted it.
Then I'm confused. How does anyone sell sex if there is no legal way to purchase it?
Or is the point simply to discourage prostitution without criminalizing it or blaming the sex workers?
Exactly, by ensuring that the 'customers' are the ones who can be prosecuted it is aaver for those that want to get out seek help without running a personal risk for doing so. Sweden is often upheld as an example in this area.
Yes, that would be the result of that stupid lawWell, that sure was in intention. There is evidence that this policy puts the prostitutes at more risk.
Because now the prostitutes so to speak has to go where the costumers are, rather than the other way around.
It also means that a lot of prostitution has gone under ground. Again, increasing the risk of rape and/violence. But even worse: More minors become prostitutes in an underground environment, often taking bigger risks for less money and also being even more vulnerable to pimps. Because someone will likely facilitate the contact between the prostitute and the costumers.
But on another note: How will the police even prove that he was paying for sex?
As I understand it he went to a Thai-massage clinic. There is no price list saying anything about other services than massage. And he will indeed get a massage. - Just with a happy ending... - Because the girl "fancy" him and of her own "free will" and without extra charge let him ejaculate. That's basically how it works. It basically the only way it can work if you want the costumer to come to you, in a place where you can have a safer environment.
But how is the police going to prove anything, because unless the prostitutes are trafficked and seriously exploited, they have no interest in reporting their costumers to the police.
They clearly try to dissociate as much as possible; using 'this person' instead of his name or 'our nephew'... And it's not really interesting what the court's security department thinks of their own behavior; does the police agree (or is the court's security department part of the police?)?