After dipping out of the Top 20 with last week's release, Michael Jackson fares a little better with his latest re-release 'In The Closet'. Sadly there isn't much to enthuse about here as like 'Remember The Time' the single was one of the sludge of Teddy Riley tracks that made up the first side of the 'Dangerous' album. Much speculation surrounded the identity of the female vocalist on the track which was credited to just "mystery girl" on the album sleeve. Naomi Campbell mimed the vocals in the video but it was later revealed to be none other than Princess Stephanie of Monaco, depping for Madonna who had backed out at the last minute.
iceflower said:Steph at the beach with Pauline and Daniel again, I think these pics were taken last weekend:
![]()
(eastnews)
And it seems like Pauline is as confused about that as we areelmabruin said:It looks like if there were kissing.......
elmabruin said:yes i think we all are confused. I don't follow it anymore..... are they back together or not?
sm1939 said:well if they are , more fool her!!!
elmabruin said:I hope Stephanie is happy.... but I have my doubts about Daniel, he has hurt her before......![]()
Well love makes blind they say.......
sm1939 said:more like loves some times makes you do stupid things! hopefully it isnt true!
sm1939 said:more like loves some times makes you do stupid things! hopefully it isnt true!
sebastian said:I think Stephanie had to undergo an operation on her right arm.
michelle said:Right honey .... she had to undergo an operation due to some inflamed tendon in her arm.... ( ouch, poor Stephie... that's an awful pain)
RADKER18 said:Does antone know if Stephanie or her kids will attend the GP ?
Strange story after all. As to Steph not being present, I think that's something quite normal, royals rarely appear in courtpaca said:There is a follow up onthe recent incident with Steph, Daniel and the guy that is supposed to have insulted her. He went into revision, got himself a lawyer and sticks to his side of the story (and his witnesses). In the article it says even that Daniel "avait moleste" the girlfriend of the guy, which led to the insults that were directed towards Daniel, not Steph. The prosecutor has now requested 6 months, his lawyer claims it is word against word and claims benefit of doubt for his client. The final verdict is expected June 12th. Steph was absent at the trial. A pitty, since she is IMO an important witness and should be heard.
I still think that she should be heard as a witness. There are possibilities to question witnesses outside court. I believe in the name of justice and when a young man's future is at stake, this should be possible. Royalty or not. If he loses, but his story was the accurate one, then not only will he be unjustly punished, but this will haunt him for the rest of his life. Sure, he shouldn't have blown his temper in the first place, but Daniel should have avoided a confrontation as well. None of them is without fault, but one of them risks to have his life destroyed, if not all aspects are being considered. I wouldn't want that on my conscience, whether I like the guy or not. And 6 months is rather high when you consider what other people here do. There was a case were a German billionaire was convicted of human slavery (words of the prosecutor), by keeping one of her employees virtually imprisoned in her appartment for a year or so. She only managed to get in contact with the concierge who alarmed the authorities. The woman got 3 months parole and had to pay a small sum of money (roughly the prize of a bottle of champagne in some of the local venues). Her employee was sent back to Poland because she was working without a permit (which would have been the employers obligation to provide). Just to put things into perspective.iceflower said:Strange story after all. As to Steph not being present, I think that's something quite normal, royals rarely appear in court![]()