crisscross1
Courtier
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Messages
- 817
- City
- Perth
- Country
- Australia
Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez 
But not as pleasant for the pheasant.![]()
Well, I always wash my hands (whether with soap or purell ) when I cook! But I don't eat meat, so no specifically on the chicken/turkey....Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez![]()
I should think we all wash our hands before preparing a meal and although I am a vegetarian, I am able to prepare and cook meat. If you are at the side of a road and a rabbit or hare has had it's back broken after being run over, it would be cruel to just leave it suffering, because you haven't any rubber gloves. The same with game birds that have been shot but not killed. Kate only picked up the bird, she didn't snap it's neck, if you kill them or eat them you should be able to pick them up!I think using latex gloves or some kind of gloves is a good idea to pick up a carcus. But that's just me, obviously, others disagree. LOL and besides, I don't have experience picking up carcuses of any kind, so I am not knowledgable on it, but if I did, I would try to be as sanitary as I could....
Do we all wear latex gloves and use purell when we put a chicken or turkey in the oven? geez![]()
Erm - yes...
Mind you, I've spent so many years editing microbiology books and papers, including a whole book about infectious diseases transmitted from poultry to humans, that I think I have an excuse.![]()
I agree, Incas. It's sad that a photo like that is considered appropriate for publication by tabloids like the Mail.
Yeah, the focus is sad, but I'm glad I saw the pics. And the "malfunction" is not even as embarrassing as it could get. I mean, look how lecherous the tabs have gone on Diana and Camilla. Kate got off easy, I'd say. It sucks though.I think it's both funny and sad that the Daily Mail changed the story's headline to focus on glimps of Kate's bra: Royal wardrobe malfunction for Kate Middleton as the hairy one to the throne looks on | Mail Online. The headline was "Late Night Date for Kate Middleton and Her Prince (but what's with the beard)", which was focused on William's beard. The byline was "Daily Mail Reporter", which means anonymous. In another time, the writer (male or female) would be called lecherous.
And it is being re-published here! The pot calling the kettle black perhaps.
And it is being re-published here! The pot calling the kettle black perhaps.
And the "malfunction" is not even as embarrassing as it could get.
However, that doesn't distract from the fact that it's still a vulgar or cheap attidude from someone who obviously aims to become a Queen consort to allow such pictures to be taken.
It doesn't take rocket science to figure out that if Kate choses to offer the paps a low neckline they will take the opportunity. That's how they make money. So basically it's Kate decision - if she wants to see her bra in the papers the next day she'll dress low neckline. If she doesn't, she'll wear a turtleneck sweater. It's as easy as that. Considering her position as girlfriend and her experiences with the media in the past eight years the only conclusion is that Kate doesn't mind showing off her bra or a low neckline or a short skirt
and because she knows exactly what will happen and she likes the attention resulting from such pictures.
If she didn't she would dress or behave in a different way. To blame the paps is just pathetic.