Prince Andrew Relinquishes Use of Titles & Honours, & Move to Sandringham 17 Oct 2025


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
The "DailyMail" has an article today about the difficulties of moving Andrew to Norfolk.
Andrew is set to move to a "shoebox sized" temporary property on a remote part of Sandringham. The property he will finally move into is currently under extensive renovation.
Friends think it unlikely that he will remain in Norfolk full-time, he still could relocate to the Middle East, possibly Bahrain, where he has friends and business connections.
Another problem seems to be the fact that Andrew, being a "natural hoarder" has filled the rooms at RL with clutter up to the ceilings. Sources claim that 80% of his belongings must go, but must be sorted out before.
According to a source "The clutter at RL is turning what should be a straight forward move into a months-long room-by-room excavation."

How many teddy 🧸 bears does he require?
 
I hope Sarah winds up in a stable safe home. On her own.

Her daughters married 2 fine men who deserve to live free of the encumbrances Fergie can impose on those around her.
I wouldn't bet on that.
She'll probably be something of a leech for the rest of her life, unless her sons-in-law take a firm stand.
 
It seems that the latest epstein picture of AMW on the laps of several women alongside GM, was taken inside Sandringham House! How could he let these people inside this family home? Where were his boundaries? There's also that pic of her and Kevin Spacey, I believe, sitting on the Queen's throne, something like that. Extremely disrespectful. Where was Andrew's common sense and/or his respect for his mother and her position?
 
Last edited:
It seems that the latest epstein picture of AMW on the laps of several women alongside GM, was taken inside Sandringham House! How could he let these people inside this family home? Where were his boundaries? There's also that pic of her and Kevin Spacey, I believe, sitting on the Queen's throne, something like that. Extremely disrespectful. Where was Andrew's common sense and/or his respect for his mother and her position?

This presumably refers to one of the photos here:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting. It seems overwhelmingly likely that "A" is Andrew, given that in the August 2001 email he mentions having recently left the Royal Navy and to being at "Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family."

The email implies a close, trusting personal relationship between Andrew and Ghislaine Maxwell (as he was comfortable disclosing his private psychological distress to her and asking her for emotional support), though by now that will probably not surprise most people.

The reference to "inappropriate friends" as early as 2001 casts further doubt on Andrew's claim in 2019 that he had "no indication" what Jeffrey Epstein was doing.

Perhaps more surprisingly and humanizingly, the email also shows that Andrew also had a close relationship with his unnamed valet, given that the valet's departure left him in "turmoil" and felt to him like the loss of a family member. I wonder whether he still has such relationships today.

"The files also include a series of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell and someone who signs himself as “A” and uses the alias “The Invisible Man”.

In August 2001, “A” wrote to Maxwell: “I am up here at Balmoral Summer Camp for the Royal Family” before adding:

How’s LA? Have you found me some new inappropriate friends? Let me know when you are coming over as I am free from 25th August until 2nd Sept and want to go somewhere hot and sunny with some fun people before having to put my nose firmly to the grindstone for the Fall.​

Maxwell replies: “So sorry to dissappoint you, however the truth must be told. I have only been able to find appropriate friends.”

“A” responds: “Distraught!” before adding that he has lost his valet and has left the “RN”.

The email continues:

…now my whole life is in turmoil as I have no one to look after me. He was a real rock and almost a part of the family ... If you have any good ideas as to how to get my mind back on track I’d be grateful for advice. See you real soon… I hope if you are coming over. A xxx"​

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, left the Royal Navy in 2001. There is no suggestion that the emails indicate criminal wrongdoing."​
 
The email from A also mentions "the girls are completely shattered and I will have to give them an early night today as it is getting tiring splitting them up all the time".

So A seems to be someone who knows Maxwell and Epstein, has visited them, was in the Navy, left the Navy on 2001, had a Valet from 2 years old and has two daughters of his own who travelled to Balmoral for the summer with him.
 
Yes, and "Girls" is capitalized.


From other emails in February and March 2002, quoted in the same article:

"Later, in February 2002, there is an exchange between Maxwell and The Invisible Man or A, in which she forwards correspondence with a third party, Juan Estoban Ganoza, about arrangements for a trip to Peru that include setting up meetings with “girls”. The forwarded message says: “I just gave Andrew your telephone no”. A replies: “I will ring him today if I can”.

“About the girls … how old is he?” asks Ganoza. In the reply, A says: “I am overwhelmed at the kindness and generosity of the offers that are being made for me.”

He adds: “As for girls well I leave that entirely to you and Juan Estoban!”

Another exchange in March 2002 refers to the trip to Peru. Maxwell has forwarded an email with a list of requests on A’s behalf. One line reads: “Some sight seeing some 2 legged sight seeing (read intelligent pretty fun and from good families) and he will be very happy.

“I know I can rely on you to show him a wonderful time and that you will only introduce him to friends that you can trust and rely on to be friendly and discreet and fun.”

Maxwell refers to A as “a very English sounding gentleman on the phone”."​

Why was "from good families" a requirement for "2 legged sight seeing"? To Andrew's credit, there was also an "intelligent" requirement...
 
A summary of (some) Andrew-related content from the US Department of Justice's newly released Jeffrey Epstein-related files:

"Here’s what the latest documents claim about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor:

The former Prince Andrew engaged in sexual conduct with a victim of the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, according to a US Department of Justice document released in the latest tranche of the so-called Epstein files.

Thousands of new files relating to convicted paedophile have been released by the US DOJ, including a request from the authorities to interview Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in April 2020.

It also asked UK authorities to conduct a “compelled interview” with him under oath if he refused to agree voluntarily.

The request was in relation to two criminal investigations, one involving Epstein and the other on Peter Nygard, a former fashion mogul who was sentenced to 11 years in prison in 2024 for sexual assault.

The letter claimed Mountbatten-Windsor “may have been a witness to and/or participant in certain events of relevance” relating to the investigation into Epstein.

The justice department wished to learn of any visits Mountbatten-Windsor had made to properties owned by Epstein, particularly the lengths of such visits and any other individuals who attended.

It asked for information on whether any females under the age of 18 were present at such visits, and if Mountbatten-Windsor had engaged in any sexual contact with such individuals.

Furthermore, the authorities asked for any copies of communication from Maxwell or Epstein on females they had arranged Mountbatten-Windsor to meet, including evidence of sexual encounters and their identifying features, as well as records of any payments Mountbatten-Windsor had made to the two.

The justice department said it wished to interview Mountbatten-Windsor on the history and nature of his relationship with Epstein, Maxwell and a redacted name within the bundle.

It also sought to learn of any payments made to or received by Mountbatten-Windsor to Epstein and Maxwell, and details of any conversations relating to the pair’s sexual preferences."​

 
I hope Sarah winds up in a stable safe home. On her own.
Her daughters married 2 fine men who deserve to live free of the encumbrances Fergie can impose on those around her.

OMG @Leopoldine , when I reached a word from your line, "I hope Sarah winds up in a stable..." my eyes got wide open because I thought you meant her ending up in a horses' stable 🐎.
 
Last edited:
Why are this mails from 2002 coming out know. Who kept it ? Did he ever have advisers in the past ?

The US Justice Department is publishing more and more of the Epstein Files (compiled by the FBI) because the US Congress (Parliament) voted to publish them.

So basically the FBI kept the emails.

I think he never listened to advisers when he disagreed with them.
 
I should have said "steady" or "settled". It was not my intention to suggest anything other than that meaning.
 
A summary of (some) Andrew-related content from the US Department of Justice's newly released Jeffrey Epstein-related files:

"Here’s what the latest documents claim about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor:​
The former Prince Andrew engaged in sexual conduct with a victim of the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein, according to a US Department of Justice document released in the latest tranche of the so-called Epstein files.​
Thousands of new files relating to convicted paedophile have been released by the US DOJ, including a request from the authorities to interview Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in April 2020.​
It also asked UK authorities to conduct a “compelled interview” with him under oath if he refused to agree voluntarily.​
The request was in relation to two criminal investigations, one involving Epstein and the other on Peter Nygard, a former fashion mogul who was sentenced to 11 years in prison in 2024 for sexual assault.​
The letter claimed Mountbatten-Windsor “may have been a witness to and/or participant in certain events of relevance” relating to the investigation into Epstein.​
The justice department wished to learn of any visits Mountbatten-Windsor had made to properties owned by Epstein, particularly the lengths of such visits and any other individuals who attended.​
It asked for information on whether any females under the age of 18 were present at such visits, and if Mountbatten-Windsor had engaged in any sexual contact with such individuals.​
Furthermore, the authorities asked for any copies of communication from Maxwell or Epstein on females they had arranged Mountbatten-Windsor to meet, including evidence of sexual encounters and their identifying features, as well as records of any payments Mountbatten-Windsor had made to the two.​
The justice department said it wished to interview Mountbatten-Windsor on the history and nature of his relationship with Epstein, Maxwell and a redacted name within the bundle.​
It also sought to learn of any payments made to or received by Mountbatten-Windsor to Epstein and Maxwell, and details of any conversations relating to the pair’s sexual preferences."​

Please hear that I think that AMW is disgusting and am not at all defending him, but the media, at least, seems to be picking him as a scapegoat. There were PLENTY of other wealthy men involved in this abusive “lifestyle “ - I don’t even know what to call it. When are we going to hear about them???
 
Please hear that I think that AMW is disgusting and am not at all defending him, but the media, at least, seems to be picking him as a scapegoat. There were PLENTY of other wealthy men involved in this abusive “lifestyle “ - I don’t even know what to call it. When are we going to hear about them???
True, Pavlos and Marie Chantal are pictured with Sarah, Bea and Eugenie with Peter Nygård, another billionaire convicted sex offender. Seems everyone is mixed up in this sort of thing, innocent or not.
 
This article claims that Andrew will be out of Royal Lodge before his birthday in February. While Marsh Farm is still being renovated, he's to move into temporary lodging at Sandringham.

 
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton's refusing to testify in the investigation against Epstein, and is claiming that:

"Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences."

It couldn't just be that he might have something to hide.
 
This article claims that Andrew will be out of Royal Lodge before his birthday in February. While Marsh Farm is still being renovated, he's to move into temporary lodging at Sandringham.

I can imagine that he is a living nightmare to deal with , its the staff that I feel so sorry for!
 
I can imagine that he is a living nightmare to deal with , its the staff that I feel so sorry for!
Woe to anyone who drops a teddy bear during the move.
🧸 All kidding aside, he must be a nightmare, not only because of his rude and brusque manner, but he appears to be a hoarder as well. On top of that he is certainly annoyed that he is having to leave Royal Lodge so he will likely make those feelings known throughout the move.
 
From December 25:

"The Epstein files, the latest batch of which were released in the United States this week, include lurid and unproven claims of criminality involving Andrew that took place in England.

A 35-year-old claimed they were drugged and driven by their father to an abuse ring in Surrey in the mid-1990s, when they were aged between six and eight.

According to the allegation, the individual was also taken to Frogmore Cottage on the Windsor Estate, which was later home to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

There, it is claimed, the child was restrained on the table and “tortured with electrical shocks” by Maxwell, while Andrew and other men watched on.

The allegations are not proven, and Surrey police said it had no record of them being reported to the police before."​


I appreciate the author, Tom Witherow's, reminder that not all allegations documented in the Epstein files are true/proven.
 
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton's refusing to testify in the investigation against Epstein, and is claiming that:

"Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences."

It couldn't just be that he might have something to hide.
The DOJ was told to release all files relating to Epstein and have only released 1%. Perhaps our President is the one trying to hide something.
 
The DOJ was told to release all files relating to Epstein and have only released 1%. Perhaps our President is the one trying to hide something.

It is quite obvious that Trump, Clinton and the former Prime Minister of Israel all have got something to hide. They obviously have got a lot more power than Andrew and therefore have not been likewise exposed.
 
Meanwhile, Bill Clinton's refusing to testify in the investigation against Epstein, and is claiming that:

"Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences."

It couldn't just be that he might have something to hide.

Epstein visited Bill Clinton at the White House 17 times. That's how buddy/buddy they were. Here we are with Andrew ostracized in the UK for having the same affiliation to the same exact person. And yet, in the USA Bill Clinton is untouchable by the media and you don't see anyone on the nationwide news carrying this story and putting it front and center on the Epstein scandal.
 
Back
Top Bottom