- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Messages
- 84,144
- Country
- Germany
As it turns out, Beatrice now has her own documentary, film and TV production company, which is based in Monaco.
https://instagram.com/astreafilms?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
https://www.instagram.com/p/CtielXyt21I/
My editors Cristina Flamini and Annalisa Forgione. How many chats, laughter, discussions, notes at 4 in the morning (every night!), discoveries, light bulbs �� suddenly turned on, intuitions, and above all passion. How much I love you!
It is a real event. Vittorio Emmanuele shot someone. Further to this, à part of Italian royalist consider that he lost his rights and chiefs of IRF and pretendant to the Italian Throne is the Aosta family (prince Amedeo and his wife Princess Olga)As I can understand, Beatrice accuses Vittorio Emmanuelle for murder?
It is a real event. Vittorio Emmanuele shot someone. Further to this, à part of Italian royalist consider that he lost his rights and chiefs of IRF and pretendant to the Italian Throne is the Aosta family (prince Amedeo and his wife Princess Olga)
Sent from my SM-A426B using The Royals Community mobile app
Vittorio Emmanuele belongs to the house of Savoya and is descendant of the first King of Italy, former King of Piemonte.Both of them belong to the same dynasty-house?
Vittorio Emmanuele belongs to the house of Savoya and is descendant of the first King of Italy, former King of Piemonte.
As for the Aosta RF, they are also from House of Savoya but then... I couldn't explain better, it is unclear for me. The Italian RF thread gives better explanation.
https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2411
He's basically saying he's not happy about how the documentary has been presented, specifically pointing out that his father had been acquitted in a (very controversial, I add) trial in Paris in 1991 and this new documentary casts doubts on this conclusion. He speaks on behalf of his father, who is now very old and frail, and according to him, no longer able to defend himself. He states that Vittorio Emanuele had agreed to take part in the documentary hoping it would give him a chance to explain his side of the story, but his son is clearly not very happy with the result.Can anyone speaking italian tell us what he says (taken from Noblesse et Royauté site Communiqué du prince de Venise après la diffusion du documentaire “Il Principe” – Noblesse & Royautés
Thank you in advance !
Thank you very much !He's basically saying he's not happy about how the documentary has been presented, specifically pointing out that his father had been acquitted in a (very controversial, I add) trial in Paris in 1991 and this new documentary casts doubts on this conclusion. He speaks on behalf of his father, who is now very old and frail, and according to him, no longer able to defend himself. He states that Vittorio Emanuele had agreed to take part in the documentary hoping it would give him a chance to explain his side of the story, but his son is clearly not very happy with the result.
Personally, I've watched the documentary and I found it very interesting and also quite balanced. It certainly casts many doubts about Vittorio Emanuele 's acquittal, but they are entirely justified and based on factual elements, not to mention VE's own ammission of guilt in 2006 while incarcerated in Italy for unrelated charges (he claims that those sentences were taken out of context, but there's actually a video of him saying to his cellmate "I fooled them all", referring to the French judges). It was certainly to be expected that a documentary (mainly) about Dirk Hamer's death would not show VE in a very favourable light
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CujLTTYAGh3/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
The family for Beatrice Borromeo. Video