What we have to remember is since Diana's death, Burrell sees himself as "her rock" and he needs to insert whatever he can that shows that he was privy to things everybody else wasn't.
That's how I see it anyways.
Burrell is a backstabbing lowlife who is still milking his 15 mins just like Andrew Morton. Whatever Hasnat did after Diana died is nobody's business!But would it really be better if none of us knew Hasnat's condition near the end?
I hardly think so. Especially a poignant small episode of no words exchanged. That's why the story is so effective.
Other than Scotland Yard taking extreme dislike to him while crashing his place, no benefit of the doubt accorded him, and carting out every last item from the home, I don't quite see the animosity. I understand the "rock" part, but he receives little credit as a kid from the other side of the tracks, who vaulted himself to admirable heights within the RF.
Some fellow butler in Scotland remarked after 'Royal Duty' that "he ought to be shot" for disclosing parts of Diana's life...does that not strike anyone as just a little sanctimonius?
If you don't see anything wrong with endlessly re hashing about Diana's private life in the media and divulging stuff about her friends who DID NOT want to be in the media, I can't agrgue.
Whatever Hasnat did after Diana died is nobody's business!
QFT, this low life scum won't let this woman rest in peace as long as he can make a buck and be on TV.
That and blackmailing HM. He had no right to remove any of Diana's property from her apartment. I always wondered what he took, what he still had, that made HM suddenly remember she gave him permission to take Diana's private possessions "for safekeeping". As if!
I have to admit to uncharitable feelings when he tried to crash the wedding. I loved it when he was escorted away.
I do wonder about this man's mental health. Instead of sitting comfortably at home with his husband and a glass of champagne to toast the new couple in front of the telly, he hangs around St George's in Diana's gifts of cuff links and tie in the hopes of injecting himself somehow into the Harry/Meghan story. This is desperation for a few minutes more of fame or a rather pathetic obsession long past its use by date.
I do wonder about this man's mental health. Instead of sitting comfortably at home with his husband and a glass of champagne to toast the new couple in front of the telly, he hangs around St George's in Diana's gifts of cuff links and tie in the hopes of injecting himself somehow into the Harry/Meghan story. This is desperation for a few minutes more of fame or a rather pathetic obsession long past its use by date.
Was hoping for an honest opinion, with examples to substantiate a point. I've seen him on TV but am not sure why it is a bad thing. Sales of the book must have been enormous for this level of tongue lashing, animosity to prevail.
I think it's the book combined with how he keeps trying to cash in on his connection to her, including appearances on reality shows like "I'm a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here (twice in UK and Australia) and Celebrity Big Brother UK.
I also agree (having read some of what he's said and written) that he is obsessed with Diana...
he is still obsessed 20 years later with someone he worked for, whom according to some reports was increasingly unhappy with his behaviour and who was saying things like "hel'll have to go." Not to mention taking her things, still trying to get on the news at her son's wedding 20 years later? If he really cant' move on from an emotional attachment to Diana at this stage, he needs therapy. he has just gotten married.. why not be happy with his new partner, remember Diana in private and be glad that he now has a good life?Career and financial well being mean a lot to the public but...I think if some took a step back from finances to look at what actually happened back then, they might see a person whose life took a tremendous dive, then snowballed further from there with the trial and trauma involved. For a number of years he had a real joy in his life despite the rigors that went with it. He found after Diana that life would never measure up to what it had been. William and Harry are chagrinned with him..that does not help his overall popularity.
Money doesn't fix those things.
he is still obsessed 20 years later with someone he worked for, whom according to some reports was increasingly unhappy with his behaviour and who was saying things like "he'll have to go." Not to mention taking her things, still trying to get on the news at her son's wedding 20 years later? If he really cant' move on from an emotional attachment to Diana at this stage, he needs therapy. he has just gotten married.. why not be happy with his new partner, remember Diana in private and be glad that he now has a good life?
What does this have to do with anything that is being discussed.When Julie Andrew's Calif. home became a prospect for purchase, it was Paul she showed the brochure to, asking what he thought, and the quarters he would reside in. Trusted as he had been with arsenal of small and large tasks, 'letting him go' then having to start from scratch with other hired help..sounds less than gratifying vs : the ability for decisive quick action taken in past or present circumstance knowing he would intuitively deliver in a manner expected.
What does this have to do with anything that is being discussed.