Lady Nimue
Heir Apparent
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
- Messages
- 4,418
- City
- Pacific Palisades CA
- Country
- United States
Charity work does good, no doubt about it, but it needs to be stressed that charity work by the (already) wealthy is something of a an easy way to garner the goodwill of the 'rest of us'.
And to 'make a living' (it's pretty effortless). Philanthropy is hard work (imagine what it would take to dispense millions to the public) but charity work is of a different stripe.
I'm sorry to be so cynical, but I've done work for charitable organizations, I've worked with 'the talent' out front. I have absolutely no problem with anyone 'making a living' via their charity work (and would argue with anyone who claims there should't be payment) but doing charity work does not immediately translate into a 'good person'. It's so complicated.
Out front charity work is (simply put) good PR for all involved. I am always a bit bemused by all the laudatory comments regarding Diana's 'charity work'. The landmine stuff with Diana is an example of a celebrity polishing their apple. Totally understandable. Diana had few options for bringing in income. Her name and connection to the BRF as a princess had sparkle and cache. She was correctly using it imo, but we should never lose sight of the fact that Diana potentially had other reasons behind keeping her name front-and-center with the public. Given what I have come to understand regarding Diana, her motivations were likely complex and layered.
Saying all the above does not then discount that Diana as a person may not have enjoyed serving in that very public out-front way, and was not exceedingly good at it.
However, she was also problematic for some of her 'causes', given that it was more about her and the photo-op than any real connection to the organization she was at that moment serving by her momentary presence. JMO. (I do wince when people go on about her charity work, tho).

I'm sorry to be so cynical, but I've done work for charitable organizations, I've worked with 'the talent' out front. I have absolutely no problem with anyone 'making a living' via their charity work (and would argue with anyone who claims there should't be payment) but doing charity work does not immediately translate into a 'good person'. It's so complicated.
Out front charity work is (simply put) good PR for all involved. I am always a bit bemused by all the laudatory comments regarding Diana's 'charity work'. The landmine stuff with Diana is an example of a celebrity polishing their apple. Totally understandable. Diana had few options for bringing in income. Her name and connection to the BRF as a princess had sparkle and cache. She was correctly using it imo, but we should never lose sight of the fact that Diana potentially had other reasons behind keeping her name front-and-center with the public. Given what I have come to understand regarding Diana, her motivations were likely complex and layered.
Saying all the above does not then discount that Diana as a person may not have enjoyed serving in that very public out-front way, and was not exceedingly good at it.
