Iluvbertie
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2004
- Messages
- 14,612
- City
- Bathurst
- Country
- Australia
Succession is relevant because it is secured for the next generation. If William and Kate had no children then the pressure would mount on Harry to have a child to secure that succession. The BRF is well aware that the children of younger sons have inherited in the past. They are also well aware of the situation that arose 200 years ago when the King had no legitimate grandchildren, despite having 15 children.
A 'side trip' is not necessary a minor trip but one taking place during a visit somewhere else. Just as Charles made a 'side trip' to Vanuatu in April Harry and Meghan are being sent to Fiji and Tonga in the middle of the Invictus Games - something Harry has attended every day in the past but this year he has to miss half of the games to go to these countries on behalf of the British FCO.
I am so pleased that so many people on here would be happy to take a preventable risk and face the possibility of having a child affected by the Zika virus. I don't care how small the risk - why take it at all when waiting another six months should reduce that risk at all, or if already pregnant, calling off those legs of the tour.
I hope Harry and Meghan have a number of healthy babies, if that is what they want - but I stress 'healthy'. Why take any unnecessary risks, especially for a woman who is already 37 when there are other risks already there.
A 'side trip' is not necessary a minor trip but one taking place during a visit somewhere else. Just as Charles made a 'side trip' to Vanuatu in April Harry and Meghan are being sent to Fiji and Tonga in the middle of the Invictus Games - something Harry has attended every day in the past but this year he has to miss half of the games to go to these countries on behalf of the British FCO.
I am so pleased that so many people on here would be happy to take a preventable risk and face the possibility of having a child affected by the Zika virus. I don't care how small the risk - why take it at all when waiting another six months should reduce that risk at all, or if already pregnant, calling off those legs of the tour.
I hope Harry and Meghan have a number of healthy babies, if that is what they want - but I stress 'healthy'. Why take any unnecessary risks, especially for a woman who is already 37 when there are other risks already there.