Or... the could go different and name their son Mark. It reflects both the maternal and paternal side. Mark Dyer for Harry's side and Marcus Anderson for Meghan's side.
The names are endless possibilities for this child and I'm looking forward to the name announcement.
My guess: Charles Philip David John. Maybe throw a 'Thomas' in there, if Meghan is feeling especially sentimental.
Good choices, I have wondered about honoring her father, it could break the ice. Maybe give him a chance he is an old man wbo was thrown in to a maelstrom outwith his experience. He made mistakes but so have members of the royal family and they were given 2nd chances.
I doubt if his name is going to be used. He wasn't even mentioned in the birth announcement
Good choices, I have wondered about honoring her father, it could break the ice. Maybe give him a chance he is an old man wbo was thrown in to a maelstrom outwith his experience. He made mistakes but so have members of the royal family and they were given 2nd chances.
Unfortunately, you are right.In theory I like the idea of Thomas being included as an olive branch/nod to the good times, but in reality I think it would be a PR disaster to name the baby for a father she’s not speaking to.
I highly doubt Thomas will be in the mix. Either way, though, the Markles will make a comment (Meghan's brother has apparently just said that he hopes the baby will teach her "what family really means") so they're damned if they do and damned if they don't. But I still think it's best PR wise if the name is avoided all together.
In theory I like the idea of Thomas being included as an olive branch/nod to the good times, but in reality I think it would be a PR disaster to name the baby for a father she’s not speaking to.
It is because of this reason that I think "Thomas" will definitely be included in the mix. That way it paints Meghan in a favourable, forgiving and faultless light. It puts all the discord and bitterness with Thomas Sr which is actually good PR (for the Sussexes).
It could be the second or third middle name, as per my previous suggestions (Alexander Charles Thomas or Alfred "Fred" Charles Edward Thomas) but it will be there!
The name Thomas also appears to be associated with the Earls of Sussex, which is different to the Dukedom but...
Ernest could be used as a middle name.
What if the baby has only two names?
Henry Charles Philip after his three ancestors on paternal side.
Or Marcus Philip Victor and the kid'll really be a MVP of the royal family.
Oooh.. there's a name I've not seen before. Victor after Victoria. Has there been a Victor in the BRF before?
Or Marcus Philip Victor and the kid'll really be a MVP of the royal family.
Oooh.. there's a name I've not seen before. Victor after Victoria. Has there been a Victor in the BRF before?