Of all Spain yes but remember that Castile always allowed Queens Regnant, ie Isabella of Castile - Mother of Catherine of Aragon - At that time Aragon & Castile were united under Isabella and her husband Ferdinand of Aragon.Originally posted by Victoria@Apr 29th, 2004 - 8:09 am
That's interesting! If they have a girl it will be the first Queen heiress to the throne am I correct?
You hit the nail on the head!! There have been Queen Regnants of Spain back in the 18th and 19th centuries. The Spanish monarchy is like the British Monarchy--males come first. If there are only females, then the eldest will succeed as HM Queen Elizabeth II did in England in 1952.Originally posted by xicamaluca@May 27th, 2004 - 3:26 am
Girls can be Queens in Spain, what happens is that male as prefence over female (the called "Ley Salica" (salic law)). So, if Felipe and Letizia only have girls, the eldest will be Queen, there isn't any problem with that.
What the goverment wants to change is the salic law, to end the prefence. Means that the eldest, male or female, will became the heir to the throne :flower:
But this change only can happen in 4 years time, and is probable that the 1st child of Felipe and Letizia is alread born, so the most certain that the change will only apply to Felipe's grandchildren![]()
Imagine how many old kings must be "turning over in their graves" when the next generation of kings (er ... queens) inherit their titlles ?Victoria Posted: Apr 28th, 2004 - 7:09 pm
That's interesting! If they have a girl it will be the first Queen heiress to the throne am I correct?
that's true. it's difficult and maybe also dangerous nowadays to change the spanish constitution.Originally posted by Meg@May 30th, 2004 - 6:40 am
All parties, also PP agree it is necessary changing the Spanish Constitution, but the process is very complicated.
Just a little off topic here, but King Carl of Sweden doesn't oppose the idea of women coming to the throne. The reason he was uncomfortable with the change in the was when Prince Carl Phillip, he second child and only son, was born he was given the title of Crown Prince as he was expected to succeeded his father. However, when Sweden changed its constitution, Prince Carl Philip was stripped of his title and it was given to Princess Victoria. The King feels that the constitutional change should have come into effect with Prince Carl Philip's children and not with his children. He has had a hard time excepting that his daughter is now heir and not his son.Originally posted by tiaraprin@May 27th, 2004 - 10:38 pm
It seems most of the monarchies now are trying to remove the Salic Law-this should be interesting. I have read that King Karl Gustaf XVI is not a supporter of this--he doesn't wish his daughter to become Queen--not out of disrespect to her. I guess he thinks it is a man's job--I don't know.
Althought the child, if confirmed, would be illegitimate?Originally posted by Ariel@Aug 2nd, 2004 - 9:55 am
If Spain change its laws about sucession and it comes true that Felipe's ex fiancee's child is his, then she will become the next Queen of Spain and not Letizia's first child.
Josefine said:is there a special title for the new heir
Josefine said:no soecial duke title or something like that
In Spain men have prefence over women to ascend the Throne. CP Felipe is the younguest child of the King, but he´s the heir. The called Sallic Law. So, i belive, that is similar to GB.Aussie Princess said:Can I just ask, what is the law in Spain? is it like the British law, that girls can ascend the throne, but only after boys and are 'bumped down' the sucession line, cause I thought girls couldn't ascend the throne at all in Spain?