USCtrojan
Royal Highness
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2003
- Messages
- 1,758
- City
- Phoenix
- Country
- United States
This topic has run its course. Closed.
ysbel said:You know looking back at these photos it is remarkable how young Charles looked. You expected Diana to look that young but never Charles.
He was 33 years old when they married and that seemed so old at the time but he looked much younger than 33. Now I'm several years older than that so 33 seems positively young to me now!![]()
ysbel said:You know looking back at these photos it is remarkable how young Charles looked. You expected Diana to look that young but never Charles.
TheTruth said:Remember the good moments :
ImageShack - Hosting :: 095go4.jpg
ImageShack - Hosting :: 062dw8.jpg
ImageShack - Hosting :: 080xy5.jpg ...
Enjoy![]()
Okay lets not get too carried away with our own opinions of Diana alright.HRH Kimetha said:I agree with you that Charles looked younger than 33. He began to look his age during the troubled years of his marriage. It had a wearing affect on him, yet Diana seemed to glow, perhaps due to her manipulation of men and others as she used her position and looks to gain power.
Or perhaps because she was 12 years younger, had the money to spend on the best skin care, and knew how to use makeup. It's probably just as simple as that.HRH Kimetha said:I agree with you that Charles looked younger than 33. He began to look his age during the troubled years of his marriage. It had a wearing affect on him, yet Diana seemed to glow, perhaps due to her manipulation of men and others as she used her position and looks to gain power.