So, as a result, of watching her closely and are "far more knowledgeable" of her, certain members can easily deduce -- without even knowing her personally hence had personal one on one contact with her -- that she is completely wrong for Albert and the future of Monaco? Yeah, that makes a lot sense.
Obviously, none of Charlene's critics has ever met, spent time, live or lived in Monaco, polled the entire country of their thoughts, Charlene.
Just because some members read the tabloid magazines, watch news clips, view hundreds of still photos, visited Monaco on vacation, and asked three strangers on the street and/or asked your Aunt Patty's third cousin once removed who lived in Monaco for two months what they thought of her, doesn't give anyone who has never met her personally any legit insight or conclusion as to who Charlene is.
Until a member of this board (or more) has spent a considerable amount of time with her -- on deep personal level -- then 90% may believe these bizarre claims about Charlene.
No one will ever have a clear insight as to who Charlene really is or what she is like with Albert and so forth. One may have an insight if they hang around the couple every single day 24/7. Furthermore, I'm sure someone will announce that "Their best friend's Uncle's third cousin knows the couple and they say..." speech...
First you have taken my quote out of context and then go an rant about many who through their observations have opinions - some follow the British royals closely some follow Monaco. I urge readers to read my whole quote. Now for my response to your rant:
You are presumtive in your opinion that the people who give opinions here are silly, morons whose sole impressions come from tabloids. Do not INSULT MY INTELLIGENCE! You have no idea who any of us are. Why do you assume we get our information only from looking at pictures. I have met Albert. I have friends who know him. I have not met her. So yes I suppose I fall under the the friends third cousins Uncle AND I must must ask what makes you such an authority to say that all that is printed or photographed is not true. Are her own words not true in her interviews? Be careful how you answer that one. You have the right to your opinion and the right to remain skeptical you do not have a the to silence opinions with your arrogance - after all you would be silencing yourself since you are no more in possession of the facts than you claim we are not. IN THE END THIS ENTIRE FORUM IS BASED ON OPINIONS- ALL OF IT EVERY SINGLE ONE - BRITISH, DANISH YOU NAME IT. MY statement here is not a rant anymore than yours is. Therefore I am not ranting I am voicing a strong opinion because I will not stand for such an insult.