Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor News and Events 1: Oct 2025 -


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Article about Andrew and Sarah in the DM today. Friends and/or sources say that they both are devastated about having to move out of RL and are worrying about the psychic condition of them both.
Fergie is said to be "homeless" now? Her daughters "unable" (or is it unwilling?) to help.
What became of all the millions from her various projects?
She should have some financial means, considering she's been living rent-free for thirty years.
 
I don't think so. She has not appeared in public since then, nor has she updated her instagram account since last september, which is unusual because she always posted a lot of news concerning herself and her daughters. Well, she must concentrate on where and how to live in the future. I hardly can believe that she still hasn't found a new place to live, there was ample time to look out for it.
 
I don't think so. She has not appeared in public since then, nor has she updated her instagram account since last september, which is unusual because she always posted a lot of news concerning herself and her daughters. Well, she must concentrate on where and how to live in the future. I hardly can believe that she still hasn't found a new place to live, there was ample time to look out for it.
Can she stay living with Andrew? If she can't live with your daughters and don't have a family home to move to, I have no idea where she could go...
 
If my minimum wage earning 55 year old sister who has just gone through an awful divorce that left her with almost nothing can sort out a new place to live, so can Sarah Ferguson. Nobody should feel sorry for her situation. It is entirely of her own making.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Andrew's new Sandringham accommodation comes with the condition that Fergie is NOT included.
I remember that from the very beginning, all the newspapers wrote that Sarah would definitely not be moving back in with Andrew. As we now know, they weren't living together because they suddenly fell in love again, but because it was convenient for both of them.
A huge house where each of them could retreat to their own wing if they wanted to, practically rent-free and yet appropriate to their “status.” And, if they wanted to, they could communicate with each other or receive visits from their daughters and grandchildren together. They had certainly hoped that things would continue like this forever. Now the past is catching up with them. Sarah, too, has to come to terms with it, and she has only herself to blame.
 
Can she stay living with Andrew? If she can't live with your daughters and don't have a family home to move to, I have no idea where she could go...

I wouldn't be surprised if Andrew's new Sandringham accommodation comes with the condition that Fergie is NOT included.

The palace briefed at the time that Sarah was welcome to join Andrew at Sandringham but was unlikely to do so.

See here:
 
I hope the materials and fixtures being used to upgrade Marsh Farm are the plainest stock items available at any home improvement store. Besides being rightfully disgraced for his behavior, Andrew has a habit of trashing his homes. So why shouldn’t Charles save some money and install stock cabinets and off-the-shelf faucets?
 
Where Sarah lives is entirely and completely her own decision. As we all know she lived in a huge mansion with Andrew purely for their own mutual convenience. If she doesn’t want to live in Norfolk in a five bedroom house with her ex, then don’t. The same with any granny flat her daughters may provide.

The world is wide. Sarah surely has a couple of million left out of all the millions of dollars she has earned over the years, and I’m sure she still has some links/contacts with people in London, Windsor, Europe, the ME or the US who would be willing to lease her a small apartment. She is now a free agent. Use that as an opportunity to start a new phase in her life.
 
Last edited:
When I said she dosnt look like an adult, I meant it looks like a teen, the body looks like that of an adolescent, and we all know that was the age Epstein liked to have around.
However let's keep in mind that most women used to be smaller and weigh less 20 years ago than they do now.
What might appear to be an adolescent, might actually be a typica young l adult woman from years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRL
Where Sarah lives is entirely and completely her own decision. As we all know she lived in a huge mansion with Andrew purely for their own mutual convenience. If she doesn’t want to live in Norfolk in a five bedroom house with her ex, then don’t. The same with any granny flat her daughters may provide.

The world is wide. Sarah surely has a couple of million left out of all the millions of dollars she has earned over the years, and I’m sure she still has some links/contacts with people in London, Windsor, Europe, the ME or the US who would be willing to lease her a small apartment. She is now a free agent. Use that as an opportunity to start a new phase in her life.
What really is needed is for a full audit of Fergie's assets to be undertaken in order to see exactly what she owns. This would certainly separate her affairs from Andrew M-W. As you say, she has earned millions; she also seemed to be very good at keeping them - her staff were paid very badly, if at all - during one of her many financial crises, the Daily Telegraph disclosed that she came to agreements with many of them whereby they accepted a proportion of what they were owed. This I always thought was particularly nasty of Fergie, because she then carried on her usual round of holidays, parties and appearing in designer clothes. Incidentally, the Historian A.N. Wilson disclosed last month that all of Fergie's literary 'efforts' were in fact written by ghost writers who were paid pittances. At one stage, Fergie was earning considerably more than AM-W

To deal with some of the points raised above:

Fergie has never been made bankrupt [unfortunately in my view, because this would have forced the appointed official known as the 'Trustee in Bankruptcy' to investigate all her assets.]

Any items that are royal property are just that - not owned by Andrew [or Fergie]- on their loan a formal [for which read 'official' record of the loan] would have been made. Andrew would therefore find himself unable to retain from Royal Lodge anything that was 'owned' by either the Royal Collection or indeed by the Royal Family.

Any items that AM-W [and Fergie] received on royal tours as 'gifts' actually belong to the state, not AM-W and/ or Fergie.

AM-W certainly used to gift Fergie jewellery as presents - I have identified Cartier necklaces when she wore them; she also possesses the magnificent Tiara that she wore to her wedding - a present from HLM.

More intriguingly, Fergie owns (or perhaps owned!) El Pucará, the Argentine polo ranch she inherited from her mother. When Fergie received her divorce settlement from Andrew, the papers [including the reputable ones] claimed that Fergie gave half the money she received to her mother to 'save the ranch' which Mrs Barrantes was in danger of losing because of her own financial difficulties ['the apple does not fall very far from the tree' etc] I know that some of the land was sold to the Australian Kerry Packer who was a polo player. Mr Packer owned an adjacent estate. I would speculate that if the ranch is still in Fergie's possession, some of it might belong to her sister Jane, because I assume that Mrs Barrantes left El Pucara to both her daughters, although Fergie might have bought Jane's share out. Either way, it would not belong to AM-W

AM-W has apparently received an invitation to live in Bahrain. Could this be extended to Fergie as well? Even if she wanted to do so, Fergie might have difficulty in moving abroad - most countries in Western Europe would not want to host a reprobate like her.


If Fergie wishes to live in Windsor, she might be able to rent / lease one of the very much smaller cottages located in the Great Park. I am remined about Marina Ogilvy, who was able to do this even though she was very much persona non grata at the time. [It was then discovered that the rent was being paid by Social Security {British Welfare]

That aside, I am intrigued by photos today showing AM-W riding with a horse and a groom from Windsor Castle. I would have thought that he had to surrender these privileges.
 
Last edited:
Why is Andrew M-W allowed to continue riding royal horses? And why is he allowed to do so in the company of a royal groom? I have looked at the photos in the link you supplied [thank you for that] and can see from the road that he is heading towards the [Windsor Castle] Royal Mews. [I live just outside Windsor] and so know the area. If it is a horse that he owns, it should be stabled (i.e. for the moment) at Royal Lodge, where there are stables. If these are 'royal' horses, then AM-W should not be permitted to ride them period. And neither should he be accompanied by a royal staff member.

Andrew has no shame whatsoever it is clear. As I write this on my laptop, I can see all the fresh 'Epstein emails' being released....each one concerning AM-W links him to Epstein and/or Maxwell and many of them disgust me. You would think AM-W would be hiding away in shame-but no, there he is in full public view bold as brass...

Come on Charles, the optics of this are appalling:; DO something.
 
Last edited:
I really wish the media would stop taking photos of Andrew out horse-riding .
It must be a slap in the face to all of the victims in the Epstein files seeing him out with not a care in the world.
He can add callous to his long list of names!
 
Ah yes, but surely the REAL issue is that he should NOT be riding at all - the problem is NOT that he was photographed but that he was out riding...
 
I don't think most people care whether Andrew goes riding or not. He can't stay indoors all the time, and he's only within the Windsor estate. I'm a lot more bothered about Peter Mandelson apparently sending Epstein minute by minute updates on the attempts of different parties to form a coalition after the 2010 general election. It's a shame that people don't get thrown into the dungeons at the Tower of London any more!

A rare sensible suggestion from a politician (Robert Jenrick):

“In light of the appalling circumstances, Mandelson’s ministerial pension must be confiscated and donated to a charity that helps the survivors of sexual abuse."

What a good idea.
 
According to The Sun newspaper, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has already left Royal Lodge for Sandringham. The Sun says that Andrew left Royal Lodge on Monday night and "He was driven 212 kilometers to Sandringham and driven to the Norfolk property in the dark to avoid being seen."
Andrew has moved to Wood Farm Cottage, where he will be staying temporarily, and will subsequently move permanently to the house next door at Marsh Farm in early April, once renovations are complete.


 
Last edited:
Sounds like a good plan given the renewed scrutiny in Andrew, Epstein et al. Philip seemed to manage to live at Wood Farm and never be papped whilst doing so, hopefully Andrew can do the same.

I don't really have an issue with him going out horse riding. He hasn't been convicted of a crime - other than appalling judgement and crassness and him being locked up inside with no exercise isn't going to help anyone. I mean, Epstein was convicted of procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18 and was allowed out each day for work release which included being allowed to continue his businesses and use his own driver to drive him to and from prison to his office. Andrew not being allowed to go riding would see him (who, again, has not been convicted of a crime) being punished worse than someone convicted of using a minor for prostitution.
 
I'm a lot more bothered about Peter Mandelson apparently sending Epstein minute by minute updates on the attempts of different parties to form a coalition after the 2010 general election. It's a shame that people don't get thrown into the dungeons at the Tower of London any more!

A rare sensible suggestion from a politician (Robert Jenrick):

“In light of the appalling circumstances, Mandelson’s ministerial pension must be confiscated and donated to a charity that helps the survivors of sexual abuse."

What a good idea.


I have posted the latest updates on Lord Mandelson in The British Nobility thread 2: Sep 2022 -.

Andrew not being allowed to go riding would see him (who, again, has not been convicted of a crime) being punished worse than someone convicted of using a minor for prostitution.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has already received worse punishment than someone convicted in the British courts of sexually assaulting two children (Lord Ahmed), who was allowed to keep his noble title.

 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what kind and how big of a staff Andrew will have at Marsh Farm?
It was said that Charles was only willing to pay for staff at Sandringham already to pop over to cook, clean etc. I suspect Andrew might well get one full timer - a housekeeper or valet of some kind but otherwise I think its a case of staff at Sandringham "popping over" to do what needs doing.
 
Posts about Andrew’s arrest have been moved here:

 
According to this article in the "DM" Andrew is not remorseful or humble, a source close to the family says that he is grumbling about where to keep his horses and where to park his car. But then, what can we expect as he has never ever admitted any guilt or made an apology to the victims, instead denying all the facts. This was reported before he was detained, but it is still doubtful if the interrogations have changed his state of mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom