- Joined
- Feb 15, 2018
- Messages
- 5,722
- City
- the West
- Country
- United States
A number of off topic posts have been removed. Please stick to the topic of the thread.
I wonder if Scotland would go to the Jacobites.I know this thread is about alternate history but also it would be fun to see alternate future, like what if Charles III did a Charlemagne and divided his kingdoms, so we have the Duke of Edinburgh as the king of Scotland or the Princess Royal the Queen of Australia
Exactly[.....]
Personally, I think the odds are good that a Crown Prince Carl Philip would not have been as excellent an heir as Crown Princess Victoria. This is of course speculative (because this is a thread for speculation), but I suspect that for Crown Princess Victoria, being parented by a father who was vehemently displeased with having his daughter rather than his favored son as his heir (as many have said, given the comments he has made publicly, one can only imagine the things he’s said privately) made her less confident in herself and more motivated to prove herself worthy of her position than a Crown Prince would have been.
A Crown Prince Carl Philip raised by an indulgent father who proudly treated him as his favorite child would be less likely to develop the same humility or the same external motivation to work to be the perfect heir.
That said, his gender would mean that he – and his crown princess consort – would be idealized in certain ways compared to Victoria and Daniel as the crown princess couple in real life, and that would contribute to his popularity.
And he would be the pretender even if they did follow male-preference primogeniture.If the descendants of Maria II of Portugal followed absolute primogeniture their pretender would be Prince Alexander of Saxony.