Search results

Harry went to the funeral and to me that was more important than the service yesterday. What I don't get is when the remembrance service was first announced many were saying they shouldn't come. .they were not welcome. Then it became how dare they not come. Aside from the security issue...

If reports that both parties can talk after the jubilee is over is true...Andrew's lawyers are terrible or Andrew has delusions of a way back The whole purpose of a settlement is to make it go away.

I think it was nice Harry and Eugenie got to enjoy the Super Bowl together. It has always been said they were close. I am disappointed but not surprised by the attacks being made on Eugenie.

I am not a lawyer. A quick reading suggests he could refuse if he runs out of options. However I believe that would result in a default against him. That would him basically be admitting guilt. The best thing for him and the RF is to settle asap.

He has to try to settle. Otherwise he will be compelled to give a deposition and I don't think he wants that. The questions will she accept a settlement and where does he get the money?

That is Andrew's doing. In the BBC interview he said he doesn't sweat due to an "adrenaline rush" suffered during the Falklands war. That was one of the reasons he gave for her story being wrong. He was denying dancing with her at Tramps and being sweaty.

The mayor of NYC is term limited and cannot run again. The new governor intends on running for a full term in the upcoming election.

Doesn't it take an act of parliament to remove the dukedom of Sussex? They are not using the HRH. Even if dukedom and HRH were formally taken away would not they still be Prince and Princess Henry (Harry)?

There are many things in life that are unfair but most do not meet the definition of corruption. This doesn't meet the standards of corruption. Harry and Meghan never said they would disappear. They couldn't just demand to meet with mayor and governor. The mayor and governor chose to meet...

I actually like the statue. I wasn't expecting to. While a statue can never fully capture a person. I, personally, look at it and am reminded of Diana.

Actually The Queen did loan Charles the money for the cash settlement to Diana. At the time of the divorce he was "cash poor". Yes he had plenty of money but not that much cash on hand that was liquid. I feel Charles should have paid for security until they were settled...

I truly felt for The Queen. For the first time to me she truly seemed alone. She appeared so tiny with her head down and unsure. It must be horrible, no matter how strong your faith, to realize that your husband, sister and parents...those you have known you best and longest are only memories.

Yes that's the one, I just watched it. You are right in that it would be hilarious if not so shocking and I would add sad. These are real people not commodities. I was disturbed by them commenting on something they haven't seen pretending they had.

My questions have always been and remains this: if the media, palace officials and POSSIBLY some family members have done nothing wrong why are people acting like they are worried about what might be said in the interview? Why does the RF accept/tolerate being the punching bag of the media? Why...

Same in parts of FL. Below 65 many pull out boots, coats the whole winter garb. I am still in tank top and shorts. I also tend to run hot. It is 40 degrees Fahrenheit in Jersey, my Windows open and fan running.

Thank you! I have somewhat softened on my view of Charles since the War of the Wales but I still hold him more responsible as he was in love with someone else and hoped in time to love Diana. We don't know actual conversations and the timeline is a bit winky but the broad strokes are there. I...

The hypocrisy of the tabloid media is making me angry. While no one except the parties involved were privy to the actual conversations and there is dramatic license, the broad stokes ring true to what the media was reporting at the time. All one needs to do is watch actual documentaries and read...

So the friendship between Charles and Sir Laurens van der Post wasn't real than either? Or does it only barely possible since it involves Harry. We all know there are various levels of friendship. In fact the Biden's were not the main "in" I was thinking of. Since the beginning of time things...

Members of the opposite party that are in government are invited to some events. Again, many decline due to not wanting to go/pay for events. This is nothing new. While it is mainly for supporters I did say if you had an "in" You have access. If this were a normal inauguration Harry and Meghan...

I have been to 3 and invited to 5. Lots of people are invited to the inauguration (actual invites) the majority going to supporters and of course you do have various types of famous people. You don't necessarily have to be a major donor (You do need money to buy tickets to the various events)...

That was being said well before Meghan came on the scene. I remember defending Kate saying that she and William were enjoying their "reverse retirement" at that time. I felt they were being given time to be as private and normal as they could before they lost that ability . I am still glad Kate...

"Doors to manual" and Wisteria sisters were said about Kate by friends of William and Harry back when they were dating. There are many ways of expressing racist behavior without saying something obvious. None of us were there, we don't know the tone of expressions that may have accompanied...

When considering whether or not Henry felt questioning his relationship with Meghan was due to racism or snobbery to me makes sense. Remember "doors to manual" that was snobbery as was the Wisteria sisters. I would think Harry would know his friends and if he felt their remarks were out of line...

Ok, I see this argument all the time and it has merit. However, despite the dismissal there is at least 1 probably 2 additional layers here. No one wants to use the "r" word so let's go with unconscious bias; it is real and it does exist. There have been things said in the tabloids about Meghan...

I think the difference in Canada is that they were not on private property, if I remember correctly. The difference in LA is that it was private property, therefore there is an expectation of privacy.