HM Queen Elizabeth II​ - Rest In Peace
The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.01 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: Ish
Forum: British Royal History 08-21-2016, 12:51 AM
Replies: 278
Views: 59,417
Posted By Ish
You're mixing things up a bit here... Edward...

You're mixing things up a bit here...

Edward III had 5 sons who survived into adulthood; Edward, the Black Prince, Lionel of Antwerp, John of Gaunt, Edmund of Langley, and Thomas of Woodstock.
...
Forum: British Royal History 05-11-2014, 05:51 PM
Replies: 278
Views: 59,417
Posted By Ish
Hmm... I think Lancaster won because while...

Hmm...

I think Lancaster won because while Henry VIII may not have been a Lancaster himself, he had been identified as the heir to the Lancasters. The Lancasters may have died out, and in the...
Forum: British Royal History 05-11-2014, 03:42 PM
Replies: 278
Views: 59,417
Posted By Ish
I wouldn't necessarily say that one had better...

I wouldn't necessarily say that one had better monarchs than the other. It's a bit more complicated than all of that, and things aren't really on even ground there.

The Yorks had a better claim...
Forum: British Royal History 05-05-2014, 04:31 PM
Replies: 278
Views: 59,417
Posted By Ish
I disagree here. Both sides lost out during...

I disagree here.

Both sides lost out during the war, and after it. The Lancaster and York lines were decimated through the war. The country lost out during the war, but I think it won in the...
Forum: British Royal History 05-04-2014, 03:50 PM
Replies: 278
Views: 59,417
Posted By Ish
I would consider that both sides lost and both...

I would consider that both sides lost and both sides won. Henry VII was the Lancastrian heir, in a manner, but he wasn't technically a Lancaster. Elizabeth of York was not the York heir due to her...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5

 


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM.

Social Knowledge Networks

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2022
Jelsoft Enterprises
×