The Royal Forums

The Royal Forums (https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/)
-   The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family (https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f34/)
-   -   The Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Family, News and Events 6: August 2021- (https://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f34/the-duke-and-duchess-of-sussex-and-family-news-and-events-6-august-2021-a-48857.html)

Fem 09-16-2021 12:34 PM

While we all knew they were going to be included in this list, I think it was a little bit overdone.

It's not their fault, the photos look absolutely awful - photoshoped beyond any rational stage - that when I saw them for the first time, I thought it was a shot from the Lifetime movie and not the real Harry and Meghan :lol: But I was glad NOT to see Harry in another blue suit. So... meh.

The little blur by Andrés is as sweet as cotton candy, but that is to be expected, they had to explain the choice somehow. I laughed about the last sentence: "They run toward the struggle."

Quite ironic in their case.

Osipi 09-16-2021 12:57 PM

I think that it is a good thing that the focus of all the 100 on the list is basically because of the good things those 100 have accomplished and that is the full monty of why they were selected. Nothing else figures in. Not the scandals, not the reputation or judgment of the court of popular opinion or even status and wealth. Time magazine deemed them noteworthy and, IMO, that is what matters in this case.

Prinsara 09-16-2021 01:00 PM

Osipi, Donald Trump is there, too. And Modi, Joe Manchin, and the president of Iran. Notoriety = influence.

Mbruno 09-16-2021 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iceflower (Post 2425709)
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are among the Time Magazine's 2021 list of the 100 most influential people and new portraits have been made for this:


** Pic 1 ** Pic 2 **


** time.com: Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex **


The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are doing "their thing" and pursuing their private careers in the US where they are celebrities (banking on their royal titles, of which they were not stripped). In the UK, most people probably don't care except their more ardent fans and enemies of the monarchy who want to use the Sussexes as weapons against the next King(s).

Osipi 09-16-2021 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prinsara (Post 2425937)
Osipi, Donald Trump is there, too. And Modi, Joe Manchin, and the president of Iran. Notoriety = influence.

Exactly. Notoriety comes in all kinds of assorted flavors and packaging. They are people that stand out in our world for this or that. No judgment, no
bias, no collecting $200 for passing Go. It is just a list.

Prinsara 09-16-2021 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osipi (Post 2425945)
Exactly. Notoriety comes in all kinds of assorted flavors and packaging. They are people that stand out in our world for this or that. No judgment, no
bias, no collecting $200 for passing Go. It is just a list.

But then you can't really say "everyone is basically there for the good things they accomplished".

Osipi 09-16-2021 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prinsara (Post 2425952)
But then you can't really say "everyone is basically there for the good things they accomplished".

Right. I stand corrected. Back to the topic of the Sussexes making the top 100. :smile:

Erin9 09-16-2021 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fem (Post 2425932)
While we all knew they were going to be included in this list, I think it was a little bit overdone.

It's not their fault, the photos look absolutely awful - photoshoped beyond any rational stage - that when I saw them for the first time, I thought it was a shot from the Lifetime movie and not the real Harry and Meghan :lol: But I was glad NOT to see Harry in another blue suit. So... meh.

The little blur by Andrés is as sweet as cotton candy, but that is to be expected, they had to explain the choice somehow. I laughed about the last sentence: "They run toward the struggle."

Quite ironic in their case.



Yeah. I thought the pictures weren’t flattering. At all.

The last sentence was rather ironic all things considered. Not to mention waaaay over the top imo.

HenRach Dominion 09-16-2021 05:09 PM

It's nice to see that, in spite not being working members of the British Royal Family anymore, HRH The Duke and Duchess of Sussex still practices its main values of using their wealth and privilege to help and speak for those without either or those. After seeing everyone else on the list, I would conclude that they're in good company, for better or for worst.

ACO 09-17-2021 08:30 AM

Well considering these photos have produced days of nonstop chatter --- I think it was quite fitting they were included. My goodness. Lol

Silverpot 09-17-2021 12:54 PM

Well, I don't know how influencial they are, I can't judge that, but they certainly are among the very few on that list I know about. :lol:

Durham 09-17-2021 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HenRach Dominion (Post 2425990)
It's nice to see that, in spite not being working members of the British Royal Family anymore, HRH The Duke and Duchess of Sussex still practices its main values of using their wealth and privilege to help and speak for those without either or those. After seeing everyone else on the list, I would conclude that they're in good company, for better or for worst.

If I might respectfully say so this sounds like a misunderstanding of the role of the rf. It's only fair to point out that the main value in having a rf lies in its members supporting the crown & representing the British people. It's certainly not about the importance of individual members in it.

As to whether h&m fit that criteria is for others to say.

Moonmaiden23 09-17-2021 02:27 PM

That TIME cover is hands down the most unflattering photo I have ever seen of the Sussexes.:sad:

It's almost as if they were being spoofed instead of celebrated....with Harry seeming to be trying to hide behind his excessively photoshopped wife.

HighGoalHighDreams 09-17-2021 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moonmaiden23 (Post 2426119)
That TIME cover is hands down the most unflattering photo I have ever seen of the Sussexes.:sad:

It's almost as if they were being spoofed instead of celebrated....with Harry seeming to be trying to hide behind his excessively photoshopped wife.

I thought the same. This is a shame, since the Sussexes are a stunning couple.

Osipi 09-17-2021 03:27 PM

Photoshopped or not, it's clear that it's the Sussex couple and that, really, is all that matters. :)

Princess Luna 09-17-2021 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osipi (Post 2426138)
Photoshopped or not, it's clear that it's the Sussex couple and that, really, is all that matters. :)


Amen :smile:

iceflower 09-23-2021 09:50 AM

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex visited the One World Observatory at One World Trade Center in New York City today, September 23:


** rex gallery ** gettyimages gallery ** gtresnews gallery ** ppe gallery **


** dm article: It's wonderful to be back! Meghan and Harry are joined by NYC Mayor de Blasio..**

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKbro9_WyIs

Durham 09-23-2021 01:33 PM

So the Mayor of NYC & the Governor of NY State formally greet a private couple who represent nobody but themselves & who live in the same country.

Do elected officials normally line up to meet celebrities in the USA? I would have thought it was the other way round. Maybe one of our US members could explain.

ACO 09-23-2021 02:36 PM

https://twitter.com/USAmbUN/status/1441106513334919172

Harry and Meghan meeting with Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

Durham 09-23-2021 02:44 PM

Yes that's all very well but why do these two get access to this US ambassador?

Can any US citizen get a meeting with such a senior member of the US diplomatic service? He's not even an American!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2022
Jelsoft Enterprises