Quote:
|
Quote:
They aren't selling their titles. Edward, Sophie and Fergie tried to sell their royal connections back in the day and were firmly slapped down. More recently Peter tried to sell his royal connections in a milk ad and he was slapped down as well. And Anne's kids don't have titles because their father wasn't royal. Andrew's daughters have jobs. They aren't out there selling the fact that they have royal titles though I'm sure it helped them get their jobs. It's not a double standard to anyone but Meghan and Harry. Get a job if you want one but don't "sell" your ties to the royal family for a profit. No one said they couldn't leave the royal family. They just said they couldn't profit off their titles. None of them have been allowed to do that. |
Quote:
Don't accept the offer of an extremely grand Wedding/House/role and ducal Titles.. Had THEY been honest, and clear then, all this could have been avoided, and the Royal family, [and the British Public] not been left with the unpleasant feeling we'd all been 'led up the Garden path'.. |
Quote:
Anne's children do not have titles and were never intended to be part of the working family.. THey have always earned their own living.. Nobody is stopping Harry from dropping out of royal wrok, if that is what he wants to do... |
Quote:
We do not know for sure but just MAYBE they did tell the Queen what they wanted for their future, to step back and earn their own money. The Queen may have said no or let’s wait and see, let’s try it this way or that way. I firmly believe Harry wanted to leave the public life a long time ago, especially when his past gf’s did not want to be part of the public and Royal life. Harry saw this more and more with each gf. Then there was William and Kate...the trio ran around together and They could have pressured Harry into staying on board. When Megan came along, Harry had support first from his gf who he kept silent about for some time, later his wife. They did IMO try the Royal life to appease the Queen...the Firm’s pressure, but it appears it still was too much for Harry. He carried around a lot of grief and burdens since his mum died. Megan supported Harry in what ever he wanted to do....what was best for Harry. It may have taken longer but Harry would have left the spotlight and Firm. That is one reason why he stayed in the military he was away from the Firm and pressures, being as normal as possible. Yet, Harry left the military because he was called to come back...work the Firm. Most people blame Megan, everything is her fault, she changed Harry, she decided all of this, when I believe Harry wanted all this change years ago all Megan did was support Harry, her husband. Actually the blame goes to the Queen and Charles....they are very very old, old fashion. Change is not to be, they want things to stay the same, they want total control. Diana fought the Firm too and looked what happened. The Queen and Charles have not really modernized the Firm at all. In the future I would not be surprised to see that when William is King he will have no say so in the government at all. Just be a figure head of the Royal family. Other royal Families are slimming down, the siblings of the future monarchs are private citizens and have their own careers. This should be for the Firm too. This entire process went down because in the back ground, which we are not privy too, the Queen and Charles did not want change and William just went along with them. I am tired of the bashing of Megan as the problem for all of this, however this will continue. Harry looks a lot happier, he picked his own wife, his own way now and for the future for his family. I bet William is just a bit jealous for that freedom. Many, many of those here will not agree with me and that’s fine. We all have our own opinions. I just get real tired of the bashing of Megan, the fact that they were not upfront with EG he Firm, which IMO I believe they did tell them but the Firm wanted no change. Now it has come to the media and the world to make all the comments yet we do not know what happened behind closed doors, we can only assume or we actually say what we want to have happened. Like I said this is my opinion like others have theirs. |
Nobody is ostracising Harry. He chose to leave, and then started issuing demands.
It was not ridiculous that Edward VIII had to abdicate. At that time, divorce was widely regarded as being socially unacceptable. There would have been a huge scandal even if Joe Bloggs from a small street in a small town had wanted to marry a divorcee. Many people at that time were pressurised into ending a relationship because their partner was of a different religion, or a different ethnicity, or a different social class, or deemed "unsuitable" for any other reason. Times were different then. Charles was not "forced" to marry Diana. He was under pressure to find a suitable wife, but nobody held a gun to his head and dragged him down the aisle. And Camilla didn't want to marry him at that time anyway - she chose Andrew Parker Bowles. As other people have said, there's an issue with Harry and Meghan wanting to trade off their titles. Maybe "Beatrice York" wouldn't have a top job if she were plain Beatrice Smith, and I doubt that Zara Tindall would be asked to be a brand ambassador just off her reputation as an Olympic showjumper, but they're not actually trading off the royal name. If Harry wanted to get a 9-5 job and earn a basic salary and live off that, I can't see that anyone would object in the slightest. But he doesn't. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the BRF had not moved on with the times there would not have been a marriage between Meghan and Harry or at least not the public event supported by the public and family they chose to invite. I would have been more surprised if the family had not tried to keep them within the firm, and tried to persuade them to stay. I am not sure why that would be a fault. They can maybe see that he is not moving away from the publicity and the pressures but instead moving towards different pressures. The point appears to be that they want to earn money for their charities. I am not sure how they could not have done that as working members of the family. The pair of them together could have blazed a trail with fund raising but do not want to do it as part of the BRF. Could somebody tell me how they are going to be financially independent? Do they intend earning money for themselves as well as charity funding, who decides what money is for what. |
Quote:
Yikes.:eek: |
Please be reminded that whilst this thread is closed, so is the topic. Please do not attempt to continue the discussion in other threads as such posts will be be deleted.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises