 |
|
02-18-2011, 11:04 AM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queens of Portugal
Honestly - I would love to see her in a very different style. I love the ballerina length dresses with the bouffant tulle skirts of the 50's - very Grace Kelly - with a fitted embroidered jacket with crystals and pearls. She is so petite she would look lovely. There would be one dress for the church and another for the reception. She looks great in fitted styles. Also .. what will Zara wear in the Spring?
|
Kate is quite slim, but not petite. She's 5' 10" tall (1.524 m)!
__________________
|
02-18-2011, 01:07 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,662
|
|
__________________
|
02-18-2011, 01:14 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
I do like the Dia style and it would lend itself to customization for sleeves. It really does look like a Kate style to me.
|
02-18-2011, 02:45 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,662
|
|
|
|
02-18-2011, 02:54 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
The third one is a fantastic gown! I can't get into the other "flaminco" styles; they're pretty, but not wedding to me.
|
02-21-2011, 05:36 AM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St Helens, United Kingdom
Posts: 306
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnik
|
That dress is fabulous but I feel that the hairdo is way too severe and the whole look is incomplete without a veil. As for the other dresses I've seen where the model is wearing a veil, they are all lovely but the veils need to be very much higher up and further forward. After all, you don't put a hat that low down at the back of your head so why wear a wedding veil like that?
__________________
Princess Diana, the best Queen this country never had
|
02-22-2011, 01:09 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Carolina, United States
Posts: 2,832
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by magnik
|
That dress is very, very similar to the dress my best friend wore to her wedding a couple of years ago. Hers was an eggshell color though, as it complimented her skin tone better than pure white. That and she didn't want anyone snickering as she walked down the aisle. 
__________________
"The grass was greener / The light was brighter / The taste was sweeter / The nights of wonder / With friends surrounded / The dawn mist glowing / The water flowing / The endless river / Forever and ever......"
|
02-22-2011, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Serene Highness
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: xxx, Germany
Posts: 1,282
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyAtlanta
Kate is quite slim, but not petite. She's 5' 10" tall (1.524 m)!
|
5' is 1,524m  But that would be very small, at least 10cm smaller than me 10'' are 0,254m, so 5' 10'' are 1,78m
__________________
Soccer is a game for 22 people that run around, play the ball, and one referee who makes a slew of mistakes, and in the end Germany always wins.
Gary Lineker
|
02-22-2011, 02:27 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Beverly Hills, California, United States
Posts: 2,555
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Empress Merel
|
Vivian Westwood said what I've been saying all along! Kate is not stylish!
__________________
I don't dream at night, I dream all day. I dream for a living. -Steven Spielberg
|
02-22-2011, 03:14 PM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sternchen
5' is 1,524m But that would be very small, at least 10cm smaller than me 10'' are 0,254m, so 5' 10'' are 1,78m |
Thank you for correcting my metric math. I used a converter and, obviously, it's calculation was incorrect.
However, that doesn't change the fact that Kate isn't petite. She's slim, but not petite.
|
02-22-2011, 04:32 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 2,794
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5
Vivian Westwood said what I've been saying all along! Kate is not stylish!
|
And what the rest what the world has known for years. Only now since the engagement announcement, she's dubbed as Catherine and style icon and blabla. 
I think something Calvin Klein would suit her, though I doubt Costa's designs would be cathedral enough. Maybe in the near future. I want the designers to either be Lanvin, Alberta Ferreti, Matthew Williamson or even Alexander McQueen. (Sarah Burton ofcourse) But I don't think that will happen.
|
02-22-2011, 06:09 PM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Carolina, United States
Posts: 2,832
|
|
|
I'm petite, as I'm only 5'3. I'd say anything shorter than 5'6 is considered petite.
__________________
"The grass was greener / The light was brighter / The taste was sweeter / The nights of wonder / With friends surrounded / The dawn mist glowing / The water flowing / The endless river / Forever and ever......"
|
02-22-2011, 06:25 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kailua, United States
Posts: 993
|
|
|
I always thought petite meant short, and rather small body size. Just kind of "tiny" all around. So from my understanding of the definition, Kate is in no way petite. She's thin, but she's rather tall.
As far as Westwood's comments, she has her own style and tastes, and that's fine. She made similar comments about Emma Watson, who I would say is rather stylish as well. Kate is stylish in her own way, and will appeal to those with similar fashion senses. I personally find her very stylish...so to each their own.
Kate seems to know what flatters her body best, and what she's most comfortable in personally, so my guess is we'll see something simple, and in keeping with her personal tastes, which seems to favor the wrap style, so maybe that's where we will see the "embellishment."
Personally I wish ISSA was considered a true British designer, as I would love to see Kate in a design by the ISSA house. But I'm biased, as I have a personal fondness for the line.
__________________
Have you ever wished on a star? It's a magic everyone should experience.
Be a good person.
|
02-23-2011, 12:04 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco, United States
Posts: 2,382
|
|
|
Usually Petite in clothing is for anyone 5'3" and shorter. If you are taller you are simply skinny. Petite is simply tiny all around.
|
02-23-2011, 07:52 AM
|
 |
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
Posts: 1,630
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrownPrincess5
Vivian Westwood said what I've been saying all along! Kate is not stylish!
|
Well, looking at the lady herself. I can't say that she looks any better.
|
02-23-2011, 10:24 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
I don't like most of what Kate wears on a day-to-day basis, but she is "stylish" because she's wearing what everyone else in her age range is wearing. A person does not have to have style to be valuable. I think, in time, she will surprise us all.
|
02-23-2011, 02:21 PM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: -, Netherlands
Posts: 1,650
|
|
|
I would rather call Kate slender, skinny has a negative ring to it in my ears. I am slender myself too, but nowhere as long as she is with my 5'5".
|
02-24-2011, 10:07 AM
|
|
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KittyLand Junction, United States
Posts: 3,145
|
|
|
Royal Ephemera
Although this is not about the upcoming BRF wedding, or Kate's dress, it is about Royal Weddings of the past. While surfing, I found this site http://www.argyll-etkin.co.uk/2011/2011_Brochure.pdf. It has documents related to royal engagements/weddings over the last 200 or so years. Very interesting.
All the materials are for sale.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
