The Waringo Investigation into the Functioning of the Luxembourg Court 2019/2020


If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
I am actually shocked to hear that in a constitutional Monarchy, they have so much power over their household. I think the Lux govt. needs to "lay down the law" and put a govt official in charge of the GD Household.
I'd say that, although naturally bound by the same laws and collective agreements as all employers, to my knowledge every monarch in Europe is in charge of organising their household as they see fit and that all of them would fight very hard against to much government involvement in their organisations.
I remember Queen Margrethe getting a lot of criticism for refusing to sign Collective Labour Agreements with her employees. There was political rumblings but no official action taken since she had done nothing illegal and a CLA is voluntary for the employer to sign.
 
Last edited:
I wonder why on Earth the Grand Duke allows for this behavior at his court? Afterall, they are his employees and he is accountable for all the affairs relating to the management and finances of the court, as I understand. The government must intervene and simply put the court under their control and scrutiny.

But is he really so dominated by his wife? Is this kind of man really a good material for head of state, even ceremonial one?

It's not the Grand Duchess but the Grand Duke who should face consequences.


Hence the mention of abdication??
 
I wonder why on Earth the Grand Duke allows for this behavior at his court? Afterall, they are his employees and he is accountable for all the affairs relating to the management and finances of the court, as I understand. The government must intervene and simply put the court under their control and scrutiny.

But is he really so dominated by his wife? Is this kind of man really a good material for head of state, even ceremonial one?

It's not the Grand Duchess but the Grand Duke who should face consequences.

Good point. It'll be interesting to see if anything comes out of this.
 
I'd say that, although naturally bound by the same laws and collective agreements as all employers, to my knowledge every monarch in Europe is in charge of organising their household as they see fit and that all of them would fight very hard against to much government involvement in their organisations. [...]

There are some 800 people working for the Dutch monarchy, directly or indirectly. Apart from a very handful, all of them are employed by the State and not by the King. In that sense he Royal House Service over there is comparable with a ministerial department, with the King in a similar role as any secretary-general: the King being the "Chief Executive", and not the Employer (that is the State).

I believe Spain has a similar system. So in those two countries no hassle about payment, working conditions, pensions, etc. as they are civil servants and follow the same conditions as any staff in a state organization. If the Luxembourgian staff have a similar status, then not the Grand-Duke but the Premier Ministre is responsible as the State is their employer.
 
Last edited:
Luxembourg's Association of Professional Journalists issued a press release critical of Grand Duke Henri's recent statement.

- reports are about alleged inconsistencies in personnel policy at the Cour have been relevant to labor law for years and affect the direct environment of the head of state
- common knowledge about Grand Duchess may be implied
- A rapporteur has been set up specifically to investigate these cases and the financial management at court. It is therefore a process that is of interest to the public (and taxpayers).
- Grand Duke accuses media before the Waringo report is published
- gender bias is a topic of discussion
- questions Stéphane Bern's comments which seem to imply he's read the report or has insider knowledge
- criticized right-wing politicians from ADR using the Grand Duke's statement to slander Luxembourgish press in general

Source:
Für Alex Bodry und Paul-Henri Meyers hat Großherzog Henris Brief politischen Charakter : Tageblatt.lu
[...] Private or public?

The State Ministry disagrees. “The Grand Duke obviously sent a private message. The Prime Minister did not have to be informed, ”the Ministry of State press office only informed at the request of the daily newspaper .

In the case of personal or family events - unlike public occasions - the court can express itself without the government having to approve of it. This has been common practice so far, explains Alex Bodry. "However, there are no fixed rules, but rather a tradition."

Waringo Report: Mutual Consideration

The relationship between the court and the government had always been characterized by mutual respect so as not to harm the monarchy. So Bodry doesn't think the Waringo report will be too critical. "I don't think it will contain overly sharp phrases." However, this approach also has negative consequences: "Many problems were not addressed properly because of this. There is a taboo around monarchy control. ”

[...]
Explosionsgefahr am Hof – Großherzogliche Sprengstoffexperten im Rundtischgespräch : Tageblatt.lu
[...]

Between modernization and remonarchization

Luc Heuschling notes that in addition to modernization, there has also been an opposite tendency towards "remonarchization". So Henri intended to make speeches in Parliament again as the Grand Duke. This would have added a political dimension to the ruler's representative role. The government at the time put a stop to these efforts by the court.

Public relations reached their temporary low on June 10, 2002, when Grand Duchess Maria Teresa quoted the editors-in-chief of the Luxembourg press into the palace and told in tears for an hour and a half about the bullying of her mother-in-law. [...]

[...]

The communication policy of the Luxembourg noble family is also reflected in dealing with scientifically motivated inquiries. Weber's requests to view the court archive were not accepted. In the course of her research on Marie-Adelheid's biography, the court showed little cooperation. According to Drescher, the institution wants to "keep control over the communication of its representation".

[...]

Unlike "with us"

Molitor then directs the discussion towards the Grand Duchess' temperament and origin. He asked the question whether, due to her bourgeois background, she did not master the “rules of the game” of the court and whether people in the circles of the exile Cuban upper class dealt differently with their staff than “with us”.

According to Paul Dostert, it looks as if Maria Teresa actually has the say in personnel policy because the Grand Duke is “not interested” in it. Weber confirmed this impression from her “indirect experience” with the farm.

Heuschling expressed the hope that the crisis would clarify the rules to which the court had to submit. He emphasized that he "did not want to protect Maria Teresa", but argues that in the view of the Grand Duchess there are still old clichés at work and a modern analysis "must have her own personality with her own opinion". [...]

Real changes are unlikely

According to Heuschling, the discussion would be different if Maria Teresa "were a Luxembourg man and not a Cuban woman". He believes it is important to move the discussion away from the person and to talk about rules in general. He considers the term “interference” that Drescher uses to be problematic: According to this reading, even a selected politician should not talk to his wife about politics or adopt an idea from his wife. It is different if a woman accepts ideas from her husband - then it would be "good if she listened to her husband."

[...]
 
Last edited:
The Waringo Report is expected to be published around noon on Friday January 31 on the government's online portal.

The report was discussed at the Chamber's Conference of Presidents on Thursday. Prime Minister Bettel will present the report to the Institutional Committee, along with Jeannot Waringo on February 5.

Luxemburger Wort - Waringo-Bericht: Das Warten hat ein Ende

On Thursday, RTL claims the report should be around 40 pages long about the internal work of the court. "The mission that Jeannot Waringo received from the Prime Minister was clear: one should get an idea about the management of the court's fees and, above all, the personnel costs and its management. In his report, he is supposed to make our information known in relation to other European royal houses. Comparisons of how they function internally, about how they train public and private, about how their internal and external communication functions, and about how they manage their staff."

The focus will be the period from 2014 to 2019 where about 50 people left. Retirements are excluded.

Waringo held numerous discussions with current and former employees. Quotes include "Employees feel pressured", "anxious to be reprimanded", "rare joviality" or "fear of blame"... Moreover, staff were little informed about decisions that were made, and internal communication would be lacking.

RTL - RTL-Informatiounen: Waringo-Rapport: Klima vun Angscht dominéiert um groussherzoglechen Haff

Tageblatt reports no one has been fired since Jeannot Waringo's appointment. About half a dozen were to be let go. Allegedly Michel Heintz, Grand Duke Henri's chief of staff (?) did not know about the Grand Duke's letter until he saw it on RTL.

Die Eskapaden der vergangenen 20 Jahre müssen endlich beendet werden : Tageblatt.lu
 
Waringo held numerous discussions with current and former employees. Quotes include "Employees feel pressured", "anxious to be reprimanded", "rare joviality" or "fear of blame"... Moreover, staff were little informed about decisions that were made, and internal communication would be lacking.
:bang:Nicely done, Your Royal Highnesses. Nicely done.
 
Communicated by: Department of State

On January 31, 2020, the Prime Minister, Minister of State, Xavier Bettel, presented the report of the Prime Minister's special representative to the Grand-Ducal Court to the Council of Government. The Prime Minister, Minister of State, subsequently transmitted the report to the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Fernand Etgen.

The report of the Prime Minister's special representative to the Grand-Ducal Court can be viewed in its entirety on the government's website by clicking on the following link:
http://gouvernement.lu/fr/publicati...-ministre-aupres-de-la-cour-grand-ducale.html

Committee on Institutions and Constitutional Revision of the Chamber of Deputies Wednesday, February 5, 2020.

THE MARCHECHALAT OF THE COMMUNIQUE COURT

The Grand-Ducal Court has received the report on the execution of the mission of Mr. Jeannot Waringo, special representative of the Prime Minister. In the interests of greater transparency and modernization, the Court will contribute constructively to the implementation of the improvements proposed in this report.

Grand Ducal Palace, January 31, 2020

http://www.monarchie.lu/fr/actualit...communique-rapport-jeannot-waringo/index.html
 
Last edited:
Is there an English translation of the ruling?
We hope our forum friends will summarize it and present the results to us ;) Then we'll decide what to do with the Grand Duke and his wife :D
 
Last edited:
Here is an article about the warengo investigation

https://today.rtl.lu/news/luxembourg/a/1464270.html

It starts with a comparison with a few other monarchies (Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden). If there is anything to review, then it is the monarchy of "Les Pays-Bas" which seems dwarfing the other listed monarchies in costs and personnel (or the Dutch are just the most open and transparant). If I was opposing the Dutch monarchy, the Waringo Report is feed to fire gunshots to it.

I am still reading in the preface, building up to the conclusions. Still at office now.

Most important conclusions:

1.
The most decisions in recruiting, transfering, commissioning and decommissioning of staff were more and more taken by HRH The Grand-Duchess in own person. Jeannot Waringo thought that this grip of the Grand-Duchess on HRM affairs could be 'problematic'.

2.
There is an insufficient organogram of the Court Organization, leading to confusion of roles, responsibilities and accountabilities within the Court. This contributed to a "not positive" atmosphere at the Court and to lots of movement of staff (relatively a lot of decommissions).

3.
The recommendation is to professionalise the Human Resources Management and let it be done by professionals indeed: "There are a lot of pieces for a puzzle, but there is no puzzle at the moment".

4.
Jeannot Waringo recommends a greater transparency in the finances of the Court.

5.
The advice is to establish a legal entity called "The Grand-Ducal House" to separate it more clearly from the private persons of the grand-ducal family (I am most surprised this has not been done many decades ago!).









Calculations according the report:

Budget of the Grand-Ducal House: 10,6 million Euro

Budget of the Swedish Royal House: 13,3 million Euro

Budget of the Belgian Royal House: 36,6 million Euro

Budget of the Dutch Royal House: 80 million Euro *

* The actual Budget is 40 million Euro but Waringo mentions that the amount is doubled for the indirect costs allocated to the monarchy (the palaces, the security, etc.)

Waringo: "Au total, la Liste civile des Pays-Bas serait l’une des plus élevées des Monarchies européennes. A noter toutefois qu’en raison de la discrétion de la plupart des Monarchies, il est très difficile d’avoir des données précises et comparables au sujet du coût des Monarchies européennes.

Si le budget des Pays-Bas fournit de nombreuses informations au sujet de l’affectation et de la nature des ressources allouées à la Maison du Roi, il faut néanmoins constater que les informations au sujet de l’utilisation par la Maison du Roi de ces ressources sont très parcimonieuses si l’on compare par exemple à la Monarchie Suédoise."


("Altogether, the Netherlands Civil List is said to be one of the highest in the European Monarchies. To note however, due to the discretion of most monarchies, it is very difficult to have precise data and comparability about the cost of European monarchies.

While the Dutch budget provides a lot of information about the allocation and the nature of resources allocated to the House of The King, it should nevertheless be noted that the information about the use by said House of these resources are very sparse if we compare for example to the Swedish monarchy.")

-> This is true: the King practically gets a lump sum and it is up to him to spend it, comptrolled by the State Auditor, conforming his Constitutional right to organize his own House.
 
Last edited:
The most decisions in recruiting, transfering, commissioning and decommissioning of staff were more and more taken by HRH The Grand-Duchess in own person.

2.
Is the Grand Duke totally dominated by his wife? If only in case of household management, what it makes him look like?
 
Is the Grand Duke totally dominated by his wife? If only in case of household management, what it makes him look like?

Traditionally in grand households the spouse was the châtelaine (French for: the lady owning the keys of the château) and was bossing the Household. But of course here private and public is mixed and possibly the Grand-Duchess overstepped here by bossing personnel deployed by the State.
 
Last edited:
The report explains the employees who work for Casa Grão-Ducal.

Palace:
- 1 stage manager,
- 1 Argentier-Cellar merchant:
- 1 valet
- 5 charge agents
- 2 agents seconded from the Public Buildings Administration,
- 1 cook.
*Total for the Palace: 9 people, and 2 detached people.

Berg Castle:
- 1 stage manager,
- 1 Argentier-Cellar,
- 3 valets,
- 1 craftsman,
- 1 officiating in special service of S.A.R. the Grand Duke,
- 1 reserve person for general and special services,
- 7.5 charge agents,
- 3.5 people for the kitchen: 1.5 cooks, 2 kitchen helpers,
- 3 people for building maintenance: craftsmen / workers,
- 1 person for the garden and floral decorations,
- 1 person seconded from the Bridge and Road Administration for the garden team,
- 5 agents seconded by the Administration of public buildings for the maintenance of green spaces,
- 2 agents seconded by the Public Buildings Administration for the technical maintenance of
buildings.
*Total for the Château de Berg: 23 people and 8 detached people.

Lingerie:
- 5.5 people for lingerie: maintenance of table linen, sheets and staff outfits.

Garage:
- 6 people for the garage: drivers and garage chief.

Fischbach Castle:
- 3 valets,
- 1.3 employees,
- 0.8 maid,
- 1.5 charge agents,
- 2 people for the kitchen: 1 cook, 1 assistant cook,
27.
- 2 people for building and park maintenance: 3 artisans / workers,
- 1.5 drivers.
*Total for Fischbach Castle: 12.1 people.

marshal:
- 1 Marshal,
- 1 Advisor to HRH the Grand Duke,
- 1 Advisor,
- 3 press officers,
- 1 Human Resources Manager,
- 1 Logistics manager,
- 1 employee at the general secretariat,
- 1.75 Employees,
- 6.1 Secretaries, including 1.1 assigned to the heir couple,
- 1 computer engineer,
- 1 Librarian,
- 1 Switchboard operator,
- 2 Information from the CTIE,
- 5 People for Close Protection
*Total: 19.85 people and 7 seconded people.

Grand Duke House:
- 3 Aids to the camp,
- 1.8 Secretaries,
- 2 maids,
*Total: 6.8 people.

Property management:
- 1 Secretary,
- 1 Curator,
- 3.4 Employees,
- 1 Palace Coordinator
*Total: 6.4 people

*In total, the total staff of the Maison du Grand-Duc therefore includes 89 full-time staff and 17
detached people.
 
The report explains the employees who work for Casa Grão-Ducal.

Palace:
- 1 stage manager,
- 1 Argentier-Cellar merchant:
- 1 valet
- 5 charge agents
- 2 agents seconded from the Public Buildings Administration,
- 1 cook.
*Total for the Palace: 9 people, and 2 detached people.

Berg Castle:
- 1 stage manager,
- 1 Argentier-Cellar,
- 3 valets,
- 1 craftsman,
- 1 officiating in special service of S.A.R. the Grand Duke,
- 1 reserve person for general and special services,
- 7.5 charge agents,
- 3.5 people for the kitchen: 1.5 cooks, 2 kitchen helpers,
- 3 people for building maintenance: craftsmen / workers,
- 1 person for the garden and floral decorations,
- 1 person seconded from the Bridge and Road Administration for the garden team,
- 5 agents seconded by the Administration of public buildings for the maintenance of green spaces,
- 2 agents seconded by the Public Buildings Administration for the technical maintenance of
buildings.
*Total for the Château de Berg: 23 people and 8 detached people.

Lingerie:
- 5.5 people for lingerie: maintenance of table linen, sheets and staff outfits.

Garage:
- 6 people for the garage: drivers and garage chief.

Fischbach Castle:
- 3 valets,
- 1.3 employees,
- 0.8 maid,
- 1.5 charge agents,
- 2 people for the kitchen: 1 cook, 1 assistant cook,
27.
- 2 people for building and park maintenance: 3 artisans / workers,
- 1.5 drivers.
*Total for Fischbach Castle: 12.1 people.

marshal:
- 1 Marshal,
- 1 Advisor to HRH the Grand Duke,
- 1 Advisor,
- 3 press officers,
- 1 Human Resources Manager,
- 1 Logistics manager,
- 1 employee at the general secretariat,
- 1.75 Employees,
- 6.1 Secretaries, including 1.1 assigned to the heir couple,
- 1 computer engineer,
- 1 Librarian,
- 1 Switchboard operator,
- 2 Information from the CTIE,
- 5 People for Close Protection
*Total: 19.85 people and 7 seconded people.

Grand Duke House:
- 3 Aids to the camp,
- 1.8 Secretaries,
- 2 maids,
*Total: 6.8 people.

Property management:
- 1 Secretary,
- 1 Curator,
- 3.4 Employees,
- 1 Palace Coordinator
*Total: 6.4 people

*In total, the total staff of the Maison du Grand-Duc therefore includes 89 full-time staff and 17
detached people.

All by all it is a modest but nevertheless chaotic organization it seems.
Just a proper reorganization and the Household is ready for coming decades.
 
Last edited:
I know I haven't had a lot of sleep lately and today was kind of a rough day but I am clearly missing something. How exactly do you have a fraction of a person? Is that intended to designate part-time employees?
 
I know I haven't had a lot of sleep lately and today was kind of a rough day but I am clearly missing something. How exactly do you have a fraction of a person? Is that intended to designate part-time employees?
Yes, that is how part-time persons are designated in most HR reports. I myself am a .75 person. ?
 
Hmm the report suggests there is already a HR manager?
 
And of course Tessy can't help but comment

" my beautiful Luxembourg is trembling after the release of the Waringo report."
https://www.instagram.com/p/B7-jAP9JkLs/

That may or may not true about her "beautiful Luxembourg" but i am willing to bet the former Princess Tessy is enjoying her former mother-in-law's time in the hotseat!:cool::lol:
 
It is fascinating seeing in clear print how the various Luxembourgish palaces are run and staffed.

When the HGD couple have their baby, will the costs for the infant's nannies and education and general upkeep come from the State(via an increase in Guillaume's apanage) or will they have to make do with what they are already receiving?
 
Last edited:
That may or may not true about her "beautiful Luxembourg" but i am willing to bet the former Princess Tessy is enjoying her former mother-in-law's time in the hotseat!:cool::lol:

Does she need to comment?
 
I know I haven't had a lot of sleep lately and today was kind of a rough day but I am clearly missing something. How exactly do you have a fraction of a person? Is that intended to designate part-time employees?

1, 00 FTU (Full Time Unit) = 40 hours. Can be one person, working 40 hours. Can be two persons working parttime (2x 20 hours).

O, 75 FTU then means: 0,75 x 40 hours = 30 hours per week. Can be one person. Two persons. Or even 6 persons working 5 hours a week.
 
Thanks everyone. I guess I am a fraction too but I don't think the company I work for figures it that way.
 
Back
Top Bottom