 |
|
09-28-2016, 11:23 PM
|
 |
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 566
|
|
|
"Prince Charles: The Passions & Paradoxes..." by Sally Bedell Smith (2017)
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/b...dsor/18538341/
Sally Bedell Smith, who is the author of biographies of both the queen and Diana, next planned project is what is being pitched as the "first full biography of the Prince for twenty years". Coming on the heels of Catherine Mayer's study, this should be interesting.
The article posted is about Catherine Mayers book but Smiths volume is mentioned toward the bottom. I found out about this most exciting development via the Goodreads app.
__________________
|
09-28-2016, 11:56 PM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,379
|
|
|
Thanks for posting this, Laurels. I enjoy Sally's biographies. I'm looking forward to it.
__________________
|
09-29-2016, 12:24 AM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 2,942
|
|
|
Oh good! Her bios are typically very well sourced and researched
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
|
09-29-2016, 01:20 AM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 566
|
|
|
I will be interested to see what Bedell Smith's take on Charles. The man seems to be the royal equivalent of a Roarshach test - often the authors view of C says more about themselves.
|
09-29-2016, 01:30 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, United States
Posts: 2,942
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WreathOfLaurels
I will be interested to see what Bedell Smith's take on Charles. The man seems to be the royal equivalent of a Roarshach test - often the authors view of C says more about themselves.
|
I think that's true with many royal figures honestly.
I always use Anne Boelyn as an example of how history changes depending on the perspective of the teller- and Anne's story has always been heavily influenced in its telling by the perspective the writer has on women.
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
|
09-29-2016, 01:58 AM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 566
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRHHermione
I think that's true with many royal figures honestly.
I always use Anne Boelyn as an example of how history changes depending on the perspective of the teller- and Anne's story has always been heavily influenced in its telling by the perspective the writer has on women.
Sent from my iPhone using The Royals Community mobile app
|
Touché 
|
09-30-2016, 04:52 AM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 566
|
|
|
|
02-24-2017, 11:03 PM
|
|
Courtier
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 566
|
|
|
|
03-01-2017, 03:38 AM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 9,474
|
|
|
I wasn't impressed by her Diana bio
|
03-01-2017, 06:50 AM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: On the west side of North up from Back, United States
Posts: 16,732
|
|
I'm currently reading it and haven't formed an opinion on it yet. 
__________________
To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment. ~~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~~
|
03-20-2017, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Heir Apparent
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: somewhere, Norway
Posts: 3,804
|
|
 And here we go again. Nothing new at all.
__________________
Norwegians are girls who love girls, boys who love boys, and girls and boys who love each other. King Harald V speaking in 2016.
|
03-20-2017, 09:01 PM
|
 |
Nobility
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: midwest, United States
Posts: 433
|
|
How Prince Charles wept over Camilla on the eve of wedding to Diana
http://dailym.ai/2nVZHXz
|
03-20-2017, 09:07 PM
|
|
Gentry
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: N/A, United States
Posts: 89
|
|
|
Why do people write things kind of things? If it happened, it's private and no one really needs to know
|
03-20-2017, 09:36 PM
|
 |
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 2,797
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sthreats
|
Oh please, are we back in 1992 ?
And still 6 months to go ...
|
03-20-2017, 10:05 PM
|
 |
Imperial Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bathurst, Australia
Posts: 13,212
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico
Oh please, are we back in 1992 ?
And still 6 months to go ...
|
It will only get worse as the anniversary approaches and the Diana fanatics demand that everyone wears sackcloth and ashes and moans and groans about the passing of the Sainted One and that includes demonising Charles and Camilla as the Devil Incarnate.
Fortunately these days most intelligent people have figured out that Diana was the innocent she portrayed herself as and that Charles wasn't quite as evil as Diana would like us to believe.
However the Diana fanatics are a very vocal minority and insist that everyone sees the main players in the same way that they do rather than admit that they were wrong in their interpretation Diana.
|
03-20-2017, 10:15 PM
|
|
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 8,379
|
|
|
I would hope that Sally Bedell Smith will give a balanced view in her biography of Charles. I liked her biography of Diana in spite of my being a Diana fan. She was fair in pointing out Diana's foibles and faults in that book and I think she will do the same with Charles.
I mainly posted the DM link on this biography because in its usual way the Daily Fail article cherry picks, mistranscribes and sensationalises, which is why I called it their interpretation of this biography. Nevertheless, I've already preordered the book on Kindle and look forward to reading it.
|
03-20-2017, 11:06 PM
|
 |
Aristocracy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The Blue Ocean, United States
Posts: 174
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
It will only get worse as the anniversary approaches and the Diana fanatics demand that everyone wears sackcloth and ashes and moans and groans about the passing of the Sainted One and that includes demonising Charles and Camilla as the Devil Incarnate.
Fortunately these days most intelligent people have figured out that Diana was the innocent she portrayed herself as and that Charles wasn't quite as evil as Diana would like us to believe.
However the Diana fanatics are a very vocal minority and insist that everyone sees the main players in the same way that they do rather than admit that they were wrong in their interpretation Diana.
|
I understand that you have strong opinions on this subject, but I think this might be an overstatement.
|
03-21-2017, 12:25 AM
|
|
Royal Highness
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Omaha, United States
Posts: 1,864
|
|
|
Judging by the DM article, I'm not too impressed and don't plan to read it. Nothing new indeed.
|
03-21-2017, 12:49 AM
|
|
Heir Presumptive
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,981
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iluvbertie
It will only get worse as the anniversary approaches and the Diana fanatics demand that everyone wears sackcloth and ashes and moans and groans about the passing of the Sainted One and that includes demonising Charles and Camilla as the Devil Incarnate.
Fortunately these days most intelligent people have figured out that Diana was the innocent she portrayed herself as and that Charles wasn't quite as evil as Diana would like us to believe.
However the Diana fanatics are a very vocal minority and insist that everyone sees the main players in the same way that they do rather than admit that they were wrong in their interpretation Diana.
|
Really is there any need to use language like that . You can have your views of Diana without being rude to others who don't share your view. If you dislike her and as you say it's 20 years why can't you let it go too
|
03-21-2017, 02:30 AM
|
 |
Majesty
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 9,864
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico
Oh please, are we back in 1992 ?
And still 6 months to go ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daenerys Targaryen
I understand that you have strong opinions on this subject, but I think this might be an overstatement.
|
|
No Nico, it's not the 1992 separation but the 20th anniversary of the death of Diana that will give rise to this sort of OTT rubbish.
Daenerys Targaryen, you may find Iluvbertie's statement strong but really, after the marriage ended in 1992, are we not all overdue for a little sanity. And here's yet another story . . . Diana smacking Charles around the swede every time he knelt to pray. Really?
__________________
__________________
MARG
"Words ought to be a little wild, for they are assaults of thoughts on the unthinking." - JM Keynes
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
