I don't know , but isn't it the same for all pictures posted here. none of the pics of the royals is taken by fans, so i don't think it's a problemOriginally posted by moosey60@Sep 2nd, 2003 - 9:34 pm
Lovely pictures, however, isn't there some sorta' copyright law along with that "Memories" book there?
yeh they are all from the book. Sarah is really a great photographer , i was amazed too. the other pics in the book are great too. there's one of a boat on the sea with the sun going down; i really love that oneOriginally posted by Alexandria@Sep 2nd, 2003 - 9:40 pm
Great pictures! These are all from Sarah's book of photography, right? Who knew Sarah was such a talented photographer, too?
How is that? I am far from an authority on the subject have only a basic knowledge of copyright (more patents, ie. TRIPS), but it is my understanding that the same laws apply to a piece of copyrighted material regardless of whether it is in an electronic or more traditional (book) format. Of course, these laws vary from country to country, which is why there is an international framework to which the majority of trading economies are signatories.Originally posted by moosey60@Sep 3rd, 2003 - 7:20 pm
Pictures on the internet aren't subject to the same copyright laws as those of books.
Whitney's treatment of "the women of Windsor" (the queen mother, the queen, Princess Margaret, and Princess Anne) opens, oddly enough, with a prolog not about any of them but instead criticizing the late Princess of Wales ("Drama Queen") and Prince Charles ("the queen's biggest headache"). Whitney (The Calling: A Year in the Life of an Order of Nuns) then goes over familiar ground in this superficial work-the abdication of Edward VIII, the marriage of Elizabeth and Philip, Princess Margaret's affair with Peter Townsend, the attempted kidnapping of Princess Anne, etc., unable to go into any depth owing to the amount of ground she must cover in well under 300 pages.
- from Library Journal, Liz Mellett, P.L. of Brookline, MA