Duc_et_Pair
Imperial Majesty
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2014
- Messages
- 13,235
- City
- City
- Country
- Netherlands
I fear that I don't follow you as I am unsure what Barcelona, King Albert, Kurt Waldheim, King Juan Carlos or the Flemish nationalist/neo-fascist movements have to do with our king being in Greece.
Your point was that normal Dutch people also ignore government advice. My point - and that of many others in this thread- was that he is not a normal person but the King and more is expected from him for that reason. You have not addressed that point.
I would like to quote then member of Parliament, later Mayor of The Hague, Mr Jozias van Aartsen, during a debate about the royals: "My ladies and gentlemen: we are discussing the royal family, not the Holy Family".
It was just clumsiness, non attentive, being on automatic mode. This happens. They swiftly realized the wrong signal, immediately returned. Lesson learned. Ready.
Trump adheres injecting chloride in your veins. Bolsonaro denied the Amazon is pillaged and burned by his conmen. Putin poisons his enemies. And Willem-Alexander? Gosh... what was perfectly okay on Monday was not so okay anymore on Tuesday. Ow. The shame! Hang him high! Look at you, acting like the knitting women on the front row watching the fine fleur of France being guillotined.
That was a PR trick to downplay the letter incident. WA was never "a little bit stupid", he was and probably always will be VERY stupid.
PR trick or not. He could have been stubborn and stay in Greece. My royal derrière to you. That is what his "perfect" mom did. Let the rage just rage. "My gentlemen, the lie rules" were Beatrix' famous words (perfectioned by Trump's "there are alternative facts" and "that's fake news!".)
WA made a swift decision and with this the angle was out of the incident. In comparison this unlucky vaudeville was just a wet fart in an empty egg. Pffwwttt, next news-of-the-day. The always so perfectly mask-wearing, distancing, handwashing and oh so servitudely authority-obeying Dutch (absolutely not, the Dutch are probably the most individualist and strongwilled people) pointing to a wrong assessment by the King? Spare me the bloody irony!
PR trick or not. He could have been stubborn and stay in Greece. My royal derrière to you. That is what his "perfect" mom did. Let the rage just rage. "My gentlemen, the lie rules" were Beatrix' famous words (perfectioned by Trump's "there are alternative facts" and "that's fake news!".)
WA made a swift decision and with this the angle was out of the incident. In comparison this unlucky vaudeville was just a wet fart in an empty egg. Pffwwttt, next news-of-the-day. The always so perfectly mask-wearing, distancing, handwashing and oh so servitudely authority-obeying Dutch (absolutely not, the Dutch are probably the most individualist and strongwilled people) pointing to a wrong assessment by the King? Spare me the bloody irony!
I agree with you 100% Marengo!
In itself this is a storm in a teacup, they returned quickly and would have been safe of course in their own secluded villa. What is highlights though is any of the following (some of which is just by thoughts and ramblings):
a) their seeming willingness for the PM to have to face the music for their mistakes. Yes Rutt should have banned it but he is running a government in a pandemic, the Royal House only has to worry about the King, Queen and their family. Is this a fair working relationship to hide so openly behind the PM. The days of statements having to be made to parliament are over what with social media and the like.
b) they don't seem to feel they need to set an example to the Dutch people, yes they have access to a private plane and luxury villa so can travel safely in a way others can not but really in many people's eyes they should be setting an example for everybody no matter how rich or privileged or not.
c)they and their PR people didn't see this coming and were only reactive to a huge fuss made online and in the media i.e. they were only reactive to events. the age old adage of "The best defense is a good offense" would come to mind. The Royal House could have announced something like "following the Government's advice for people to stay at home as much as possible the King and Queen will not travel to Greece as planned" and got good PR and set an example to the Dutch people rather than now facing bad PR
d)For all the blame being thrown at the Prime Minister it calls into question the judgement of the King, Queen and their staff. Why didn't they see this coming, are they so out of touch with everyday Netherlands they thought there wouldn't be a fuss about the King & Queen swanning off thanks to the privileges provided, even indirectly, by their position and status. Or did they just not care and think they could weather it? Maybe due to seemingly being so popular normally
e)Did their staff, even the PM possibly, see this coming and question it, if so how come it still went ahead? Are the King and Queen forceful in pushing their own wants and desires they would overlook good advice for the working of the crown/monarchy if it means not doing what they want personally? If so that could be a problem ahead
The King can not go out and about, nor can the Prime Minister. The Constitution says that the King is inviolable, the ministers are responsible.
Asked to Mr Rutte if we will ever know what is discussed between King and Prime Minister, he replied: "I hope not. It is an essential cornerstone in our Constitution where the Crown speaks with one voice" . For exactly the same reason the minutes of the weekly Council of Ministers are not public: there needs to be discussion, free opinions, strong differences inside the Government but as it is a college, when they leave the stately Trêves Chamber, it is the Government speaking with one voice.
When the King would say: I went to Greece against the advice of the Prime Minister. Then there is a debate about that.
When the Prime Minister would say: I had no objection against the King to travel to Greece, then there is a debate about that.
So the mantra since 1848 is: nothing what has been discussed between the King and the ministers is public. Exactly to have the King to execute his role as head of state and member of Government, this "Secret of Noordeinde" is a dogma.
So it is not that the King likes to have Rutte to catch the criticism. I think he is the person to pick up the phone in a reflex and call into a TV show. Wisely he knows this is exactly what he can NOT do because anything the head of state says comes on the plate of the Prime Minister.
Most likely to his own frustration (and known frustration of his predecessors) but this is exactly how it works. Do Not Move While You Are Shaved.
Last edited by a moderator: