The Royal Forums Coat of Arms

Join The Royal Forums Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-25-2003, 10:08 AM
Josefine's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: , Sweden
Posts: 9,504
Law exam pokes fun at royals

Law exam poked fun at the royals

Crown Prince Haakon and his wife, the former Mette-Marit Tjessem Hoiby, were the unwitting subjects of a recent law school exam that was meant to be humorous. It had a serious side, though: Students were supposed to help them handle a divorce.

Instead, students at the University of Bergen were rather shocked when they read through the legal problem they were supposed to solve.

It involved two people, "Mette" and "Magnus," who allegedly met each other at the "Kvartsfestivalen" in Kristiansand. (The crown prince's second name is "Magnus" and some of the first photos snapped of the pair were taken at the annual Quart music festival in Kristiansand.)

The exam went on to describe "Magnus" as "affluent and well-educated." He gives "Mette" a diamond necklace as a wedding gift and they eventually settle on an estate called "Skogum." (Crown Prince Haakon and Crown Princess Mette-Marit will move into the royal estate called Skaugum later this year.)

But their idyllic life is shattered when "Mette" starts arranging wild parties (the crown princess is known for being active in house party circles in the mid-1990s) at "Skogum." Students were then asked to outline how "Mette" and "Magnus" should divide "Skognum" when their marriage breaks up.

University officials have since apologized for the exam and exam chairman Jan Andersson told newspaper VG that he takes responsibility. "We now see that perhaps this wasn't so funny as we thought it would be," Andersson said.

Andersson is Swedish and has only lived in Norway for a year. He said he didn't realize the exam might spur many negative associations connected to the couple.

A spokewoman at the Royal Palace in Oslo had no comment.

Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2003, 12:38 PM
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: , Philippines
Posts: 749
For me, what they did was not funny. Maybe they were doing it just for laughter. Thay should not make fun of their royals that's not respect anymore. The people of Norway are just very vocal on Princess Mette-Marit's past. They should forget it. They are just insulting them.

Where are Prince Haakon and Princess Mette-Marit currently living now?

Never let go of anyone that you could not go a day without thinking about. There just might be a very good reason why they're always on your mind. Sometimes, it's the brain that knows too well what the heart tries so hard to deny
~ ~ Anonymous ~ ~
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 03:48 PM
roseroyal's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rose Bush, United States
Posts: 5,236
That does not strike me as funny. An institution teaching people the law of the land and justice should not poke fun at the leaders of the nation, or those in honorable offices in their government.
Plus a question of that nature will just start the tabloid rumor mill.
Very disrespectful. And that is a part of justice too- respect. And the school officials modeled the opposite- complete lack of respect.Shameful!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 04:12 PM
fairy tale's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: B., Germany
Posts: 3,305
I am a bit confused. Didn't this happen already many years ago in 2003 (see this thread). Still, I totally agree with you, roseroyal. That's so disrespectful! Unbelievable!

"Andersson is Swedish and has only lived in Norway for a year. He said he didn't realize the exam might spur many negative associations connected to the couple."
That's ridiculous! A lame attempt to justify it in my opinion.
Let your heart guide you. It whispers, so listen closely. - The Land Before Time
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 04:26 PM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 11
Yes. This is old news from the year 2003.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 05:28 PM
Her_Majesty's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 8,620
Two threads discussing the same same topic have been merged. Thanks for understanding.
Have a look at TRF Rules and FAQ

Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 08:13 PM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: mexico, Mexico
Posts: 358
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 08:27 PM
nascarlucy's Avatar
Serene Highness
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Florida Area, United States
Posts: 1,434
Because I didn't read the previous thread, I thought this was something recent. For royal couples people speculate on when and if they get married, when and if they have children so I guess it shouldn't come as any surprise that people speculate on whether or not someone will get a divorce. They already have in England with people betting on how long Prince William and Kate will be married even before they are married. Tacky to say the least
Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2011, 11:39 PM
roseroyal's Avatar
Heir Apparent
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rose Bush, United States
Posts: 5,236
I get that it was a joke. As far as I know, they are not getting a divorce, and even if they were none of my business. That is not the issue. The issue is that it was not funny and should not have been used in a law exam!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 12:16 AM
ThePrincessRoyal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 123
While I understand it is meant as a joke it was decidedly not funny... not funny in the least!
There is no sense in running to something if you are running away from something else
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 01:12 AM
Royal Highness
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Omaha, United States
Posts: 1,864

I didn't think it was funny either, in fact, I was rolling my eyes reading the scenario. It got me to thinking thought about the legal aspect of said divorce of a couple in such a situation and had to go to my law study books. I can see why the Professor used such a situation, but to use the Crown Prince couple in the problem was very poor taste. He could have used a different way of presenting the legal problem. Since it was a long time ago and it hadn't been too long after the couple was married, I suppose the Professor thought it would capture students interest. Tacky.

Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Popular Tags
abdication american anastasia baby names baptism bridal gown british royal family british royals canada carolin china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing coronavirus countess of snowdon cpr dna dresses dubai duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii facts fantasy movie george vi gradenigo history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs intro italian royal family japan jewellery king willem-alexander list of rulers mary: crown princess of denmark monarchy mountbatten names nepalese royal jewels northern ireland pless prince charles of luxembourg prince constantijn prince dimitri princess ariane princess catharina-amalia princess chulabhorn walailak princess eugenie queen elizabeth ii queen mathilde queen maxima random facts resusci anne royal court royal dress-ups royal jewels royal marriage royal re-enactments. royalty of taiwan royal wedding royal wedding gown serbian royal family snowdon thailand thai royal family tips uae customs united states united states of america wittelsbach

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises