The Royal Forums Coat of Arms


Join The Royal Forums Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
  #781  
Old 04-20-2008, 04:33 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
The marriage was morganatic. His wife was not HRH Princess Edward because the King issued letters patent specifically denying her the right to share her husband's rank. Once that happened, it became law.

Camilla's assumption of a lesser style and rank as HRH The Princess Consort (provided Parliament agrees to remove her right to be The Queen) would also be morganatic. It is not possible for The King to issue letters patent creating her a princess when she is HM The Queen.
__________________

  #782  
Old 04-20-2008, 04:39 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
So, when Charles becomes King will it be a similar situation of her legally holding the title of HM The Queen Camilla but instead choosing to style herself as HRH The Princess Consort?
No, it will not. She is legally a princess right now and holds many other titles as the wife of the heir to the throne. She has chosen to be styled as HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, rather than her senior title as Princess of Wales, with the consent of The Queen. Regardless of which title she uses, she is a princess by marriage automatically.

But once Charles becomes King, there is no other title for his wife except being HM The Queen. She cannot "choose" to be a princess or hold the style of HRH because she is automatically Queen in law. Therefore, Parliament must consent to the King's wife reliniquishing her superior rank and title and assuming a lesser one.
__________________

  #783  
Old 04-20-2008, 04:50 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTruth View Post
Legally and powerfully speaking, what will it change if Camilla becomes Queen consort ? Seemingly a Queen consort doesn't have any official power. She's certainly a major advisor of the King (and I assume Camilla already accomplishes this role). So, whether Camilla is Queen consort or not, what will it change for the UK ?
It won't. I think this was a classic case of buying a bit of short-term peace at the cost of creating a long-term problem. I mean, even last year you could see how easily the Daily Mail could whip up anti-Camilla resentment and pro-Diana feelings when the business of the memorial service came up. It's quite possible that the royal advisors felt that if they said anything at all about her becoming Queen, they could be faced with a situation where Charles really might have to choose between her and the throne.
  #784  
Old 04-20-2008, 04:55 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg View Post
No, it will not. She is legally a princess right now and holds many other titles as the wife of the heir to the throne. She has chosen to be styled as HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, rather than her senior title as Princess of Wales, with the consent of The Queen. Regardless of which title she uses, she is a princess by marriage automatically.

But once Charles becomes King, there is no other title for his wife except being HM The Queen. She cannot "choose" to be a princess or hold the style of HRH because she is automatically Queen in law. Therefore, Parliament must consent to the King's wife reliniquishing her superior rank and title and assuming a lesser one.
Nobody is saying that she can choose to BE a princess when she's Queen. The issue is whether she can legally be KNOWN AS a princess even though she's Queen. For one thing, presumably Buckingham Palace didn't come up with this "it is intended that she be known as Princess Consort" stuff out of thin air. For another, it isn't illegal to be known as something you aren't as long as you don't intend to defraud anyone. For another, it's still on the royal family website.

The Royal Family > TRH The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall > Background

It isn't even "it is intended that" nowadays, it's "she will be known as."
  #785  
Old 04-20-2008, 05:15 PM
pinkie40's Avatar
Nobility
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dallas, United States
Posts: 423
I understand the "title" situation but as Princess Consort will she be crowned in the Abbey ceremony with the Queen Consort crown worn last by the Queen Mother? (I apologize, I know beforehand this is building a mountain out of a molehill...but seriously, I wonder)
  #786  
Old 04-20-2008, 05:28 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg View Post
No, it will not. She is legally a princess right now and holds many other titles as the wife of the heir to the throne. She has chosen to be styled as HRH The Duchess of Cornwall, rather than her senior title as Princess of Wales, with the consent of The Queen. Regardless of which title she uses, she is a princess by marriage automatically.

But once Charles becomes King, there is no other title for his wife except being HM The Queen. She cannot "choose" to be a princess or hold the style of HRH because she is automatically Queen in law. Therefore, Parliament must consent to the King's wife reliniquishing her superior rank and title and assuming a lesser one.

Camilla's full style is Her Royal Highness, The Princess Charles Philip Arthur George, Princess of Wales and Countess of Chester, Duchess of Cornwall, Duchess of Rothesay, Countess of Carrick, Baroness of Renfrew, Lady of the Isles, Princess of Scotland. However, she cannot style herself as the Princess Camilla currently for she has not yet been created as such. The Queen may creat Camilla the Princess Camilla in due course as she created her husband the Prince Philip shortly after her succession to the throne.

It may be possible for Camilla to style herself as HRH the Princess Camilla the Princess Consort after her husband's assession to the throne since there is no law to forbid her to be styled as HRH rather than HM if the sovereign who is the fount of honour grants her such a title. However, it is customary for the King of England's wife to be styled as HM the Queen.

In addition to this, the wife of the King of Morocco is styled as HRH the Princess Consort.

It is also customary for the King of England to be crowned & annointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury after his succession to the throne, however, it is not by law, yet he must be an Anglican by faith etc by the Act of Settlement. I wonder what will happen during Charles' coronation. Will Camilla be annointed as the queen or will she not be annointed should she wish to be style as the Princess Consort ?
  #787  
Old 04-20-2008, 05:40 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg View Post
The marriage was morganatic. His wife was not HRH Princess Edward because the King issued letters patent specifically denying her the right to share her husband's rank. Once that happened, it became law.
Stanley Baldwin's government did not regard the Duke of Windsor's marriage to Wallis as morganatic because the duke had already renounced all the rights to the throne for himself as well as his future children between him and Wallis.
  #788  
Old 04-20-2008, 06:37 PM
wbenson's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,546
Maybe Charles, upon becoming King, could just phone up, say, the King of Norway and ask if he could make Camilla a Princess of Norway. Then she could style herself "HRH Princess Camilla." That's very far-fetched, though.
  #789  
Old 04-20-2008, 06:41 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkie40 View Post
I understand the "title" situation but as Princess Consort will she be crowned in the Abbey ceremony with the Queen Consort crown worn last by the Queen Mother? (I apologize, I know beforehand this is building a mountain out of a molehill...but seriously, I wonder)
Princesses don't get crowned; however, if she's Queen, she can be crowned with the Queen Mother's crown or maybe Queen Mary's. But the Queen Mother's crown was made to go with the Imperial State Crown, so I assume they'd use it.
  #790  
Old 04-20-2008, 06:46 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by serenissima View Post
Stanley Baldwin's government did not regard the Duke of Windsor's marriage to Wallis as morganatic because the duke had already renounced all the rights to the throne for himself as well as his future children between him and Wallis.
That was the King's conclusion with Lord Wigram in order to justify the 1937 Letters Patent. The Government only reluctantly accepted this stance in order to withhold the style of Royal Highness from Wallis.

Legally, it was clear The Duke had relinquished his rights, and that of his descendants, to the throne, but not his right to be royal under his father's 1917 Letters Patent. Therefore, there was no question of his wife being entitled to be HRH.
  #791  
Old 04-20-2008, 06:50 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
Nobody is saying that she can choose to BE a princess when she's Queen. The issue is whether she can legally be KNOWN AS a princess even though she's Queen. For one thing, presumably Buckingham Palace didn't come up with this "it is intended that she be known as Princess Consort" stuff out of thin air. For another, it isn't illegal to be known as something you aren't as long as you don't intend to defraud anyone. For another, it's still on the royal family website.

The Royal Family > TRH The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall > Background

It isn't even "it is intended that" nowadays, it's "she will be known as."
Ah, but they did come up with this scenario out of thin air! Within days of announcing this farce, it was made clear she COULD NOT be known as HRH The Princess Consort without legislation being passed.

Oops.....another blunder from Clarence House. Whether this will, in fact, come to pass remains to be seen and is by no means fait accompli.
  #792  
Old 04-20-2008, 07:11 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 113
I personally think that the Prince of Wales wishes his wife to be styled as HM the Queen when he becomes the king. However, his wife may have a different idea. The Queen may creat her as the Princess Camilla in due course and Camilla may be known as HRH the Princess Camilla, the Princess Consort or some other title which the Queen may grant her. How about the Duchess of, say, Watford ?
  #793  
Old 04-20-2008, 07:53 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by serenissima View Post
I personally think that the Prince of Wales wishes his wife to be styled as HM the Queen when he becomes the king. However, his wife may have a different idea. The Queen may creat her as the Princess Camilla in due course and Camilla may be known as HRH the Princess Camilla, the Princess Consort or some other title which the Queen may grant her. How about the Duchess of, say, Watford ?
There's no question that Prince Charles wants his wife to be Queen when the time comes. How could he not? And that may be exactly what happens since it is very unlikely the Government would agree to introduce legislation changing Camilla's title and style, but it cannot be ruled out either.

The Queen is unlikely to issue letters patent creating Camilla a princess in her own right or giving her a lifetime peerage. What would be the point of that?
  #794  
Old 04-20-2008, 07:58 PM
Imperial Majesty
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ***, United States
Posts: 16,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg View Post
Ah, but they did come up with this scenario out of thin air! Within days of announcing this farce, it was made clear she COULD NOT be known as HRH The Princess Consort without legislation being passed.

Oops.....another blunder from Clarence House. Whether this will, in fact, come to pass remains to be seen and is by no means fait accompli.
The weird thing is that it's still on the royal family website. Not just the Clarence House one, but the official one. And the wording now is firmer than when they first added it.
  #795  
Old 04-20-2008, 08:27 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by branchg View Post
There's no question that Prince Charles wants his wife to be Queen when the time comes. How could he not? And that may be exactly what happens since it is very unlikely the Government would agree to introduce legislation changing Camilla's title and style, but it cannot be ruled out either.

The Queen is unlikely to issue letters patent creating Camilla a princess in her own right or giving her a lifetime peerage. What would be the point of that?
Well, one never knows. There was no greater point in creating Philip Mountbatten as the Duke of Edinburgh but he was created as such that Camilla may be given a title of her own (which may not be a peerage) so that she may become to be known by her own title.
  #796  
Old 04-20-2008, 08:33 PM
Aristocracy
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: England, United Kingdom
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
The weird thing is that it's still on the royal family website. Not just the Clarence House one, but the official one. And the wording now is firmer than when they first added it.
Oh, I see.

When they come to some functions & the Royal Meeting at Ascot etc, we have become used to see Camilla as the Duchess of Cornwall that we will perhaps feel quite natural to address her as something else apart from the title which Charles uses. HM the King and the Princess Consort does not sound that bad at all since these are the forms that the Moroccan royal family uses.
  #797  
Old 04-20-2008, 09:55 PM
wbenson's Avatar
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: -, United States
Posts: 2,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by serenissima View Post
There was no greater point in creating Philip Mountbatten as the Duke of Edinburgh but he was created as such that Camilla may be given a title of her own (which may not be a peerage) so that she may become to be known by her own title.
Philip wouldn't have been anything at all without such a creation, though. Had that not happened, he would have been Admiral of the Fleet (after 1953, his various ranks before then) Sir Philip Mountbatten until 1957. (Or, quite possibly and quite strangely, but I think it would have been rectified, Admiral of the Fleet His Royal Highness Sir Philip Mountbatten.)
  #798  
Old 04-20-2008, 10:11 PM
Heir Apparent
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne & Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbcode99 View Post
But, should Camilla become HRH The Princess Consort I will remember your words and I think I will be able to sit back and smile.
Are you so sure? Your recent posts would suggest otherwise...
__________________

"Dressing is a way of life" - Monsieur Saint Laurent
  #799  
Old 04-20-2008, 11:20 PM
Heir Presumptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: , United States
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by serenissima View Post
Well, one never knows. There was no greater point in creating Philip Mountbatten as the Duke of Edinburgh but he was created as such that Camilla may be given a title of her own (which may not be a peerage) so that she may become to be known by her own title.
Actually, there was......he was marrying the British heiress to the throne and needed sufficient title and rank for his children. Although Philip was born HRH Prince of Greece & Denmark (he is actually far more royal in bloodline than The Queen), he reliniquished his titles when naturalized to British citizenship as Lt. Philip Mountbatten, RN.

Camilla only enjoys her husband's rank and title, the same as any commoner who marries a Prince of the UK or a Peer of the Realm. She wasn't born with any titles and doesn't need any of her own, outside of her status as a royal wife.
  #800  
Old 04-20-2008, 11:20 PM
Courtier
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
The weird thing is that it's still on the royal family website. Not just the Clarence House one, but the official one. And the wording now is firmer than when they first added it.
Perhaps because the royal staff themselves lacked the ability to clarify these matters and they are reluctant to clarify matters until they receive clear directions to do so. These people do make mistakes. Another example, in the documentary "Monarchy: the royal family at work", it is clearly stated that Prince Edward will inherit the title "Duke of Edinburgh ",but it failed to mention the fact that Prince Charles and his sons should be the lawful people to inherit the title first. I find these information as omission if not misleading.

For Camilla's title, I guess that those royal household members, royal family members, ministers, even the "royal experts" just choose the option of waiting rather than speak directly about the matters. We are the braver people!
__________________

Closed Thread

Tags
camilla, camilla parker bowles, duchess of cornwall, princess consort, queen consort, styles and titles


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Victoria's Future Title? rop81 Crown Princess Victoria, Prince Daniel and Family 80 09-12-2021 08:00 PM
Will and should Camilla use the title of Queen when Charles becomes King? muriel The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall 17 11-10-2011 10:20 AM
Crown Prince Hamzah relieved of his title: November 28, 2004 Amoula Current Events Archive 338 04-22-2005 09:28 AM




Popular Tags
american archie mountbatten-windsor asia asian birth britannia british british royal family camilla camilla's family camilla parker-bowles camilla parker bowles carolin china china chinese ming dynasty asia asian emperor royalty qing chinese clarence house commonwealth countries coronation crown jewels customs dresses duchess of sussex duke of sussex edward vii elizabeth ii family tree gemstones genetics george vi gradenigo harry and meghan hello! highgrove history hochberg house of windsor hypothetical monarchs japan japanese imperial family japan history jewellery kensington palace king edward vii king juan carlos książ castle liechtenstein lili mountbatten-windsor line of succession list of rulers meghan markle monarchists monarchy mongolia names pless politics portugal prince harry queen elizabeth ii queen victoria st edward sussex suthida thai royal family tradition unfinished portrait united states united states of america welsh


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Social Knowledge Networks

eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021
Jelsoft Enterprises
×